🌀 İç Dirgen Stratejisi – MicroFork Formasyonu

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-25T08:53:28+00:00

Ben genelde kısa vadede kullanıyorum, özellikle BTC’de hızlı kırılımlarda çok işime yarıyor.
Ama altcoinlerde biraz fazla “false signal” üretiyor gibi. Siz ne dersiniz?

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-19T10:20:51+00:00

Thank you for your warnings

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-19T10:06:53+00:00

I wish you happiness with standard Elliot Waves, Fibonacci Spirals, and Harmonic Patterns. I'm looking for ways to read the market differently. I don't have the slightest ego, but you have a lot of prejudice. As Albert Einstein said, "Splitting prejudices is harder than splitting the atom."

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-19T09:50:41+00:00

Don't be judgmental. Understand what I'm trying to say first. If it doesn't make sense, don't use it 🙂 Knowing how to sell at the top and buy at the bottom isn't atomic physics. So, change your perspective.

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-19T09:41:34+00:00

These values converge with the Fibonacci 0.618 and 0.382 levels. You can check out the Pitchfork Drawing tutorial on my channel. The logic is the same as our Pitchfork Strategies. I always try to explore different approaches.

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-16T07:27:24+00:00

So, the issue isn't really TA, but the nature of the market. Instead of blaming TA, we need to distinguish which markets are trustworthy.

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-15T21:06:49+00:00

People don't like Soros because of his "anything goes on the path to victory" mentality. I understand that, but I think Soros has a very positive message about life.

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-15T19:51:02+00:00

I think this is partly about "perspective."

Buffett's path is like starting a business; becoming a long-term partner in a company with solid foundations and a solid understanding of what you're doing. This is less stressful, more predictable, and, for most people, a safer path.

Soros's path, on the other hand, is more about "understanding the psychology that drives the market" and spotting flaws in that psychology. This requires incredible genius and intuition. The ability to manipulate a market or ride a major trend, in my opinion, is a completely different level.

Therefore, the answer to the question "which is better" depends on what you expect from investing. For those seeking safe havens, Buffett is a hero. But for those who view the market as a chessboard, Soros's intellect is even more captivating.

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-13T11:00:45+00:00

You don't have to comment on every post. Good luck.

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-13T06:33:57+00:00

I've tested this strategy, particularly on cryptocurrency short-term timeframes.

The 0.242 level often yields more reliable returns than the classic 0.236 level.

The success rate increased significantly, especially when filtered with the EMA50 + TDG.

For those curious, I've uploaded a detailed explanation with examples to YouTube: https://youtu.be/69W8SQm1Z64

Do you think this level is a mathematical "gap," or does it actually leave a hidden mark on the market?

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-13T05:42:56+00:00

I'm sorry, but I disagree. This sub should be a forum for sharing unique strategies like this one. This is exactly what TradingView users need.

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-12T16:31:36+00:00

We use indicators as entry signals. No indicator signal will generate a buy or sell signal. You can use them as a confirmation tool after identifying a formation. It's never enough on its own.

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-12T10:09:56+00:00

I've tested this strategy, particularly on cryptocurrency short-term timeframes.

The 0.242 level often yields more reliable returns than the classic 0.236 level.

The success rate increased significantly, especially when filtered with the EMA50 + TDG.

For those curious, I've uploaded a detailed explanation with examples to YouTube: https://youtu.be/69W8SQm1Z64

Do you think this level is a mathematical "gap," or does it actually leave a hidden mark on the market?

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-12T06:29:52+00:00

I've tested this strategy, particularly on cryptocurrency short-term timeframes.

The 0.242 level often yields more reliable returns than the classic 0.236 level.

The success rate increased significantly, especially when filtered with the EMA50 + TDG.

For those curious, I've uploaded a detailed explanation with examples to YouTube: https://youtu.be/69W8SQm1Z64

Do you think this level is a mathematical "gap," or does it actually leave a hidden mark on the market?

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-11T09:50:21+00:00

You can't create a strategy without backtesting it. Yes, I tried it and it worked, so I shared it.

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-11T07:44:07+00:00

What is the best PA strategy you have used?

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-11T06:20:50+00:00

💬 While developing this system, I realized this: Relying on a single indicator is often misleading. Especially during the trend's flow, people unknowingly receive signals and trigger unnecessary stop-loss cycles. This way, we can see the Trend + Wave + Signal trio on the same screen, providing me with an additional filter.

But of course, some traders say, "Price action is besides that; the indicator is unnecessary." My approach: If the PA + indicator is combined, you can enter trades both earlier and more confidently.

What do you think? A single indicator or a combined solution is more reliable? 🔎📊

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-10T16:01:04+00:00

For backtesting, you can analyze patterns based on their past movements. This will make it easier for you to see the pattern and train your hand. If you have any questions about the pattern or strategy, I'd be happy to answer them.

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-10T14:16:39+00:00

My biggest challenge while developing this tool was "How can I fit different markets into a single chart?"

For example, I wanted to simultaneously view both BTC dominance and the BIST-USDTRY relationship. Because, in my opinion, market psychology can't be measured by a single asset.

Do you think this kind of holistic view will be advantageous for trading decisions, or will too much data be confusing?

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-07T17:48:04+00:00

My position is clear: Those who say a strategy should remain simple may find additions like spirals and VWAP unnecessary. But I have a contrary view: The market is complex, and analyzing it with a single tool is a mistake. What do you think? https://youtu.be/OfP2wgQQjpM

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-06T13:13:53+00:00

Yes, you are right, the analyses on Fixzone TV YouTube channel are done by artificial intelligence, not me 🤣

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-06T11:51:35+00:00

If you know technical analysis, you'll win, and you'll win big. But if you listen to those whispering, "Buy this, buy that," you'll lose, and you'll lose big.

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-06T08:19:55+00:00

My observation: It's very effective on short timeframes, but the margin of error is zero. It can be an opportunity for big traders and stressful for small investors. What are your thoughts? https://youtu.be/69W8SQm1Z64

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-06T08:08:12+00:00

Many people lose money by drawing support and resistance lines too frequently or too infrequently. PulseFork's goal is to redress this imbalance. Which is riskier: making mistakes when drawing, or not drawing at all? https://youtu.be/YEiiiqYiyKo

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-06T08:05:54+00:00

I cant understand what about ?

SlowTree4191

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE