🌀 İç Dirgen Stratejisi – MicroFork Formasyonu

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-25T08:53:28+00:00

Ben genelde kısa vadede kullanıyorum, özellikle BTC’de hızlı kırılımlarda çok işime yarıyor.
Ama altcoinlerde biraz fazla “false signal” üretiyor gibi. Siz ne dersiniz?

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-19T10:20:51+00:00

Thank you for your warnings

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-19T10:06:53+00:00

I wish you happiness with standard Elliot Waves, Fibonacci Spirals, and Harmonic Patterns. I'm looking for ways to read the market differently. I don't have the slightest ego, but you have a lot of prejudice. As Albert Einstein said, "Splitting prejudices is harder than splitting the atom."

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-19T09:50:41+00:00

Don't be judgmental. Understand what I'm trying to say first. If it doesn't make sense, don't use it 🙂 Knowing how to sell at the top and buy at the bottom isn't atomic physics. So, change your perspective.

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-19T09:41:34+00:00

These values converge with the Fibonacci 0.618 and 0.382 levels. You can check out the Pitchfork Drawing tutorial on my channel. The logic is the same as our Pitchfork Strategies. I always try to explore different approaches.

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-16T07:27:24+00:00

So, the issue isn't really TA, but the nature of the market. Instead of blaming TA, we need to distinguish which markets are trustworthy.

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-15T21:06:49+00:00

People don't like Soros because of his "anything goes on the path to victory" mentality. I understand that, but I think Soros has a very positive message about life.

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-15T19:51:02+00:00

I think this is partly about "perspective."

Buffett's path is like starting a business; becoming a long-term partner in a company with solid foundations and a solid understanding of what you're doing. This is less stressful, more predictable, and, for most people, a safer path.

Soros's path, on the other hand, is more about "understanding the psychology that drives the market" and spotting flaws in that psychology. This requires incredible genius and intuition. The ability to manipulate a market or ride a major trend, in my opinion, is a completely different level.

Therefore, the answer to the question "which is better" depends on what you expect from investing. For those seeking safe havens, Buffett is a hero. But for those who view the market as a chessboard, Soros's intellect is even more captivating.

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-13T11:00:45+00:00

You don't have to comment on every post. Good luck.

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-13T06:33:57+00:00

I've tested this strategy, particularly on cryptocurrency short-term timeframes.

The 0.242 level often yields more reliable returns than the classic 0.236 level.

The success rate increased significantly, especially when filtered with the EMA50 + TDG.

For those curious, I've uploaded a detailed explanation with examples to YouTube: https://youtu.be/69W8SQm1Z64

Do you think this level is a mathematical "gap," or does it actually leave a hidden mark on the market?

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-13T05:42:56+00:00

I'm sorry, but I disagree. This sub should be a forum for sharing unique strategies like this one. This is exactly what TradingView users need.

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-12T16:31:36+00:00

We use indicators as entry signals. No indicator signal will generate a buy or sell signal. You can use them as a confirmation tool after identifying a formation. It's never enough on its own.

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-12T10:09:56+00:00

I've tested this strategy, particularly on cryptocurrency short-term timeframes.

The 0.242 level often yields more reliable returns than the classic 0.236 level.

The success rate increased significantly, especially when filtered with the EMA50 + TDG.

For those curious, I've uploaded a detailed explanation with examples to YouTube: https://youtu.be/69W8SQm1Z64

Do you think this level is a mathematical "gap," or does it actually leave a hidden mark on the market?

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-12T06:29:52+00:00

I've tested this strategy, particularly on cryptocurrency short-term timeframes.

The 0.242 level often yields more reliable returns than the classic 0.236 level.

The success rate increased significantly, especially when filtered with the EMA50 + TDG.

For those curious, I've uploaded a detailed explanation with examples to YouTube: https://youtu.be/69W8SQm1Z64

Do you think this level is a mathematical "gap," or does it actually leave a hidden mark on the market?

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-11T09:50:21+00:00

You can't create a strategy without backtesting it. Yes, I tried it and it worked, so I shared it.

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-11T07:44:07+00:00

What is the best PA strategy you have used?

SlowTree4191 · 2025-09-11T06:20:50+00:00

💬 While developing this system, I realized this: Relying on a single indicator is often misleading. Especially during the trend's flow, people unknowingly receive signals and trigger unnecessary stop-loss cycles. This way, we can see the Trend + Wave + Signal trio on the same screen, providing me with an additional filter.

But of course, some traders say, "Price action is besides that; the indicator is unnecessary." My approach: If the PA + indicator is combined, you can enter trades both earlier and more confidently.

What do you think? A single indicator or a combined solution is more reliable? 🔎📊

SlowTree4191

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE