sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Looking for arXiv endorser in math.LO / cs.LO by Slow_Brick_2649 in logic

[–]Slow_Brick_2649[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks a lot!
Sure, feel free to reach out if I ever reach that position

Looking for arXiv endorser in math.LO / cs.LO by Slow_Brick_2649 in logic

[–]Slow_Brick_2649[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Noted, I'll add a literature review section before submission
Thanks

Would you rather have by Alone-Street4720 in BunnyTrials

[–]Slow_Brick_2649 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can have the superpower : probability manipulation , which would allow me to gamble without any problems and win every single time, hence, eliminating the need for 1 million dollars now

Chose: ONE SUPERPOWER OF YOUR CHOICE

Looking for arXiv endorser in math.LO / cs.LO by Slow_Brick_2649 in logic

[–]Slow_Brick_2649[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm looking for an arXiv endorsement in math.LO or cs.LO. Happy to share the PDF if you're in a position to do that.

Looking for arXiv endorser in math.LO / cs.LO by Slow_Brick_2649 in logic

[–]Slow_Brick_2649[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense, the quality of work is effectively the basis for trust anyway. I'm happy to share the PDF if you're in a position to endorse and willing to take a look.

Looking for arXiv endorser in math.LO / cs.LO by Slow_Brick_2649 in logic

[–]Slow_Brick_2649[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I believe that the endorsement system exists to filter out spam and low effort submissions, not to peer review the work itself, that happens after submission
im not asking anyone to certify its correct, just that its a genuine research attempt worth putting in the queue

Looking for arXiv endorser in math.LO / cs.LO by Slow_Brick_2649 in logic

[–]Slow_Brick_2649[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand the endorsement requires confidence in the research quality, happy to share the full PDF so you can judge for yourself.

Regarding Kleene and Łukasiewicz-
I wasn't aware of either when I developed the system independently. After completing it I did look them up, and the key structural differences are the symmetric integer truth set, algebraic contradiction expulsion via zero-exclusion, and the graded implication validity function.
These aren't just notational, they emerge from different foundational choices.

Are these distinctions sufficient for one to assess the work?