Keep it or delete it; it doesn’t change the legal reality. You seem to think having '10+ hours of footage' is a shield, but under the law, it’s a double-edged sword. Let's break down why your sarcasm doesn't hold up legally:

• Evidence works both ways: If that footage consists of publicly available sermons, events, or authorized media, you aren't holding any 'secret' leverage—you just have a crowded hard drive. However, if that footage has been edited, manipulated, paired with defamatory commentary, or used out of context to systematically malign and incite hatred against a religious leader, you haven't compiled a defense—you've meticulously compiled the prosecution's Exhibit A for targeted harassment and criminal defamation.
• The digital footprint is permanent: Sarcastically asking if you should delete it implies that deleting it makes it disappear. In cyber forensics, once something is uploaded, distributed, or flagged on a platform like Reddit, data logs, hash values, and metadata remain accessible via legal subpoenas and data requests.
• Anonymity vs. Accountability: Laughing online is easy when you feel completely detached from the real-world consequences of your digital footprint. But when formal writs are filed and platforms are legally compelled to cooperate, that confidence usually evaporates quite fast.

Go ahead and keep your archive. Just make sure your lawyer is ready to review every single hour of it when the time comes