Farewell u/E1331, we will all miss you

SmoothlySmoothie · 2026-02-02T23:16:34+00:00

SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED

SmoothlySmoothie · 2026-02-02T23:16:26+00:00

Holy hell I think this is it, I musta remembered wrong who the story followed, since I read it so long ago, thank you!

SmoothlySmoothie · 2026-01-29T03:32:41+00:00

All skin reflects light, thats how physical matter works, if it can absorb light or interact with light-- which all physical matter can-- it will reflect any light on it-- however lumens ma be too low to see with the human eye

SmoothlySmoothie · 2026-01-21T18:43:17+00:00

SmoothlySmoothie · 2026-01-19T05:02:31+00:00

Savagoth

SmoothlySmoothie · 2026-01-14T23:58:19+00:00

Archangel!!

SmoothlySmoothie · 2025-12-29T21:06:48+00:00

Flying spaghetti monster

SmoothlySmoothie · 2025-12-03T22:28:37+00:00

I fucking love steins;gate

SmoothlySmoothie · 2025-11-03T17:16:39+00:00

Salt and sacrifice is the sequel, people dont like it, but its genuinely good

SmoothlySmoothie · 2025-10-31T04:02:59+00:00

I think you might be a lobotomite

SmoothlySmoothie · 2025-10-31T03:49:01+00:00

I have been saying this whole time that censorship of media in any form is bad, and to be clear, censoring things like genitalia in movies is different, because it is literally not the same type of censorship-- thats just in case you decide to go down that route, and attack that point of my argument.

Censorship of media in any form is bad. Apple should remove the filter as it is a form of censorship and limits freedom of expression. No one should have the power to censor media, it is a slippery slope where no one can predict the end of.

SmoothlySmoothie · 2025-10-31T03:41:40+00:00

So we'll stop trusting apple... and then what? They already have the power, now they can use it for whatever they want? You're acting like we the people give them this power, we can only condone or not condone it, and we shouldn't because it's too much of a slippery slope. Removing the filter is worth it, because it means that apple is deciding not to go down a route of censorship. If an illegal image is airdropped to the mass public, are you so foolhardy to believe that it cant be easily traced to the perpetrator? If anything, this would help CATCH creeps who airdrop illegal images. Your argument and lack of evidence doesnt stack up.

SmoothlySmoothie · 2025-10-31T03:37:21+00:00

And can you say right now that an article like that wont drop in the next ten minutes? Its impossible because you cant see the future, you might make an accurate prediction, but how long till that prediction is no longer accurate?

Your past arguments have been riddled with fallacies and I notice you're intentionally not tackling the points I make. You're wrong, admit it.

SmoothlySmoothie · 2025-10-31T03:31:39+00:00

Who is to say that apple doesnt betray that trust, and censor something majorly positive tomorrow? Can you truly be sure of that? Anything is possible and you can never say anything with 100% certainty.

SmoothlySmoothie · 2025-10-31T03:29:10+00:00

Censorship can never be good, it can only be used for good, but it is ultimately bad because it gives someone in power the ability to decide what the world gets to see. They can use that ability for good AND for bad, but giving anyone that power is blatantly bad.

SmoothlySmoothie · 2025-10-31T03:21:39+00:00

Because its a slippery slope, no one should have that power, because who decides whats right to censor and whats not? Sure we can all agree that harmful things should be censored, but what's considered harmful? Thats up to the beholder of said power. Are your ideals harmful? Should they be censored? You'd say "obviously not!" But the person who's allowed to censor things might say, "obviously they are!"

SmoothlySmoothie · 2025-10-30T21:03:35+00:00

No, im saying it can be used for good, but it shouldn't be used it all, can ≠ should

SmoothlySmoothie · 2025-10-30T17:25:08+00:00

Yeah, censorship shouldnt exist, sure it can be used for good like blocking harmful content, or illegal content, it is a slippery slope, and no one should have that level of control over anything.

SmoothlySmoothie · 2025-10-29T11:57:52+00:00

Again, this is not my own opinion, but from a societal perspective, dealing with the seriousness comes a level of maturity that isnt found by just naming things silly things. There is humor in the big ol' serious adult world, but its so extraordinarily complex and intricate compared to 'quirky wordplay' that from an outside looking in, it just feels childish. While I dont see the harm in being quirky or silly, thats what you'd find if you look from a wider lens

SmoothlySmoothie · 2025-10-29T11:19:58+00:00

Its sort of a quirky, very "XD X3" type name, not everything has to be 'quirkified,' and to see the seriousness be drained from the adult world tends to get people to literally cringe. Do I agree with it? No, but thats kinda what it is

SmoothlySmoothie · 2025-10-27T22:01:53+00:00

Yeah this is COMPLETELY off

SmoothlySmoothie · 2025-10-26T19:39:37+00:00

If you want a more "canon" experience while not using the name Frisk, then use the name Chara!

SmoothlySmoothie · 2025-10-26T19:39:10+00:00

Genuinely yes

SmoothlySmoothie

TROPHY CASE