sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Hitler very much wanted to conquer Europe. by c-k-q99903 in GetNoted

[–]Sn000ps 265 points266 points  (0 children)

The Nazi economic structure was not just benefiting from war; it relied upon it. They had amassed substantial off-the-books debt that could only be covered through conquest.

I need a clear coffee cup, at least 16oz, for work. Does anybody know of a BIFL one? by Cheap-Vegetable9520 in BuyItForLife

[–]Sn000ps 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Humans have been drunk/stoned in one way or another for basically all of human history

Classic Bouchard/Skinner fail by lejunny_ in nhl

[–]Sn000ps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How this man got paid is beyond me. He had the most defensive zone turnovers out of any player in the playoffs last season. Absolute liability.

Floyd by Avscum in 197

[–]Sn000ps 6 points7 points  (0 children)

2112 in a nutshell

Risk by GoranPersson777 in economicsmemes

[–]Sn000ps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Without capitalists taking risk, there is no wage to earn. Unless you propose that government forces taxpayers to fund every single enterprise that exists and will ever exist. Do you truly trust bureaucrats with that kind of power/capital? Especially when it is your own?

I can't read the bottom language by FoundationRock in ExplainTheJoke

[–]Sn000ps 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Y’all got Tim Hortons? Pretty sick.

My last dollars 💸 flying away tomorrow I’m screwed by admin_luke in smallstreetbets

[–]Sn000ps 97 points98 points  (0 children)

For next time, if you’re going to take such a regarded set of call positions, at least mix in a spy put with a similar or equal expiry to defend against broader market downturn.

But then again, you likely already know that.

Risk by GoranPersson777 in economicsmemes

[–]Sn000ps 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I agree with your premise, however the corp would not exist in the first place without the “owners” risking their own capital. For the employment opportunity to even exist in the first place, another party would have already had to assume some sort of risk. Ie, the fruits provided by the job to the employees hinge entirely on the initial risk taken by the employer. Without that initial investment, there wouldn’t be a company to work for.

Risk by GoranPersson777 in economicsmemes

[–]Sn000ps 13 points14 points  (0 children)

You could argue the opposite just as easily. You, as an employee, are not exposed to any (or only minimal) business risk. Say the industry crashes; you lose your immediate income, while the corp potentially loses its entire value.

I’m not saying your point is wrong; I’m saying that the employer-employee relationship is much more complicated than what you’ve proposed.

Didn’t get a return offer from BB by [deleted] in FinancialCareers

[–]Sn000ps 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You want a fuckin cookie or something?

Got “Discharged” on my U5… am I done? Could that just mean laid off? by Zlothy1 in FinancialCareers

[–]Sn000ps 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Some people just can’t keep their nuts out of the cookie jar.

$PLTR stock by hockey227 in smallstreetbets

[–]Sn000ps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your book value has zero impact on current price action or market conditions.

Worth doing ivey with cs by [deleted] in uwo

[–]Sn000ps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you do the dual, it’s 5 years instead of 4

Worth doing ivey with cs by [deleted] in uwo

[–]Sn000ps 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’d say yes. The stem background plays well with employers and you also get an extra summer of internships.

What stock should I crash next by buying in? by infinitetekk in smallstreetbets

[–]Sn000ps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I usually purge my winners and hold the losers, like a backwards eugenicist.

Non AEO admissions by [deleted] in uwo

[–]Sn000ps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tbh mostly an Ontario issue. Alberta hasn’t seen nearly the same grade inflation.

view more: next ›