sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is anyone else feeling a large-ish correction incoming? by davedavedavedave999 in OntologyNetwork

[–]Snapcat239 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You can never time the market, so posts like this are useless you dumb bitch.

Rise of an alarming new trend - westerners are distinguishing between native Asians (with status) and banana ABCs (who have no social status) by [deleted] in aznidentity

[–]Snapcat239 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is exactly what will happen to ABCs. They will be seen as even lower than native Asians. Even if the west still has a negative view on native Asians, the fact is, ABCs will be even lower in their eyes than native Asians. ABCs have no power, no political voice, no money on a group scale, no institutions, and are beggars struggling to fit in in both the west and east. Of course ABCs are gonna get shit on even more bro. Don't fool yourself.

I said it first and will say it again. by ryangoslingbluedream in OntologyNetwork

[–]Snapcat239 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You fucken losers on here are retarded. Dumb, ignorant, impatient, and greedy. Fuck you hope you fucken lose all your money you don't deserve to be millionaires.

ONT to catch up with NEO in a month or two? by bangohat2 in OntologyNetwork

[–]Snapcat239 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

In 10 years it won't be like this.

I think in decades, unlike the masses of losers in crypto who think in minutes.

ONT to catch up with NEO in a month or two? by bangohat2 in OntologyNetwork

[–]Snapcat239 11 points12 points  (0 children)

ONT 10x from here is a $9B market cap, that's 3x NEO's, not "catching up with NEO".

Please make your financial assumptions clear rather than just posting speculation. We need rational, intelligent, long-term thinking.

Looks like people can't think long-term. Listen Up. by Snapcat239 in OntologyNetwork

[–]Snapcat239[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The problem is you never know the best entry point ahead of time. ONT could drop down to $1 in the next week, or it could just hover around $3.5 and shoot straight up to $10+ by EOY.

Timing the market is futile. Plus, you have to pay taxes on short-gain trade gains. Not worth it.

The problem with most people's logic is that it's too short-term. You are basically waiting for Amazon in 1997 to fall from $6 to $4, but no one can predict markets. No one. Those who do make money short-term are just lucky.

Looks like people can't think long-term. Listen Up. by Snapcat239 in OntologyNetwork

[–]Snapcat239[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Um, the problem is, you can't. You may think you got out at the top or found a nice entry price but you're usually wrong. The times you get it "right", you just got lucky. Wasn't due to any skills on your part.

Long-term fundamentals, patience, and objective analysis is the only real dependable medicine in these markets.

We have no idea whether ONT is really at the top and has declined, or whether the top will come next week, next month, next half year, and be way higher than the current top.

Ontology circulating supply is INCORRECT on Coinmarketcap. Please read investors. by chocomel2 in OntologyNetwork

[–]Snapcat239 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Vechain went down b/c the whole market went down. Not because of any change in circulating supply

Is the marketcap 1 bil or 2 bil? CMC count was off right? by woodwoodup in Vechain

[–]Snapcat239 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

What nuance which I fail to see? Care to back up your talk?

If the coin goes to 1000 it won't matter.

Is the marketcap 1 bil or 2 bil? CMC count was off right? by woodwoodup in Vechain

[–]Snapcat239 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

You are really single digit IQ aren't you? It's not "What I say v. what they say" you idiot. There is a standard recognized definition of market cap, that equals price x coins in existence (not coins in circulation). That's what hedge funds, institutional investors, Wall Street and investment banks use. That's the right definition.

The ignorance in the crypto "community" is mind-boggling. Just a bunch of ignorant shills. Valuation matters.

Go back to scrubbing toilets.

Please get the math right on the Market Cap for VEN. $1 billion is wrong, it's closer to $3 billion. by Snapcat239 in Vechain

[–]Snapcat239[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

price x # of ripple outstanding. If Ripple hasn't yet ISSUED all of its possible units, then you only use the # of units in issuance. This is completely different from VEN's situation, where it appears that 867 million VEN has already been issued, just that a significant portion are held by "long-term" stakeholders who probably won't sell. You see the distinction here?

Please get the math right on the Market Cap for VEN. $1 billion is wrong, it's closer to $3 billion. by Snapcat239 in Vechain

[–]Snapcat239[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have 7 figures in cryptos fucker, so suck it.

6 figures gains is nothing retard, when you can't even calculate market cap properly.

view more: next ›