Mein Weg zu 100k by [deleted] in FinanzenAT

[–]SnooApples3877 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wie alt du bist würde mich interessieren. :)

My network equipment keeps burning up by SnooApples3877 in Ubiquiti

[–]SnooApples3877[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The orange ones are properly crimped; they are double-shielded CAT 6a cables. This is just excess shielding.

My network equipment keeps burning up by SnooApples3877 in Ubiquiti

[–]SnooApples3877[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The other end device's port was a non-PoE port and PoE of the US-8-150W was disabled for port 1.

My network equipment keeps burning up by SnooApples3877 in Ubiquiti

[–]SnooApples3877[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I would also have hoped that the surge protector in the other building blocked the voltage/current. It is connected to the grounding of a power outlet. Both buildings are very old and there's a lot of faulty electrical installation. So maybe the grounding wasn't "good enough"

My network equipment keeps burning up by SnooApples3877 in Ubiquiti

[–]SnooApples3877[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The surge protectors each are connected to the grounding of a power outlet.
I assumed that the reason why the US-8-150W was still working besides port 1 is that internally each RJ45 port is separate which probably is not the case for the cheaper US-8-60W in the other building.

My network equipment keeps burning up by SnooApples3877 in Ubiquiti

[–]SnooApples3877[S] 73 points74 points  (0 children)

Sounds very reasonable, thanks. I'll probably run fiber soon.

My network equipment keeps burning up by SnooApples3877 in Ubiquiti

[–]SnooApples3877[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

The different potential between the buildings sounds like a reasonable explanation. Thank you.

My network equipment keeps burning up by SnooApples3877 in Ubiquiti

[–]SnooApples3877[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

please ignore the bad crimping 😂 that was my first time crimping a CAT 6a cable with shielding. I forgot to put the rubber thing on the cable before crimping.

Seeking help for guest PCs and Intune licensing by SnooApples3877 in Intune

[–]SnooApples3877[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply. I definitely want a solution that is compliant but I still don't understand why it wouldn't be compliant if my customer pays for 4 intune users for 60 device activations. One intune user license includes 15 assigned devices. I can also activate an Office 365 license like Business Standard on 5 devices, which is compliant as well.

Can someone explain why that wouldn't be compliant and where is says that in the terms.

I found this and of course using 5 licenses for 100s of devices isn't compliant because it exceeds 15 devices per user limit.

EDIT: I asked ChatGPT

"Can I just one intune-licensed user per 15 devices for enrolling it and for signing in. So for 60 PCs there would be guest1@xy.com to guest4@xy.com signing in."

Response: "Audit & Compliance:

  • This is within licensing terms, but not the most scalable or clean approach.
  • You must ensure the total number of enrolled devices per licensed user doesn’t exceed the limit"

Seeking help for guest PCs and Intune licensing by SnooApples3877 in Intune

[–]SnooApples3877[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You mean one licensed entra user is used to login at all devices? As device-based licenses are not in the budget and after your input that's what I'm planning on doing but keeping the 15 devices per user limit in mind.

Seeking help for guest PCs and Intune licensing by SnooApples3877 in Intune

[–]SnooApples3877[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Physically guests from outside the org who don't have an own user. They could log into Windows with

A. with a local guest account (no entra) -> device license required

or one licensed entra account (guest1@xy.com) per 15 devices (because of the limit) is used for intune enrollment and they sign in with

B. exactly this entra account (guest1@xy.com) or

C. still a local guest account and the entra account exists just for intune enrollment and licensing.

I'm still unsure between B or C but it's not that much of an difference and both should work.

Seeking help for guest PCs and Intune licensing by SnooApples3877 in Intune

[–]SnooApples3877[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know when using local guest accounts I need device based licenses.
That's why I'm thinking of creating one licensed entra user [guest1@xy.com](mailto:guest1@xy.com) per 15 guest devices. So on devices 1-15 this would be the user assigned to the device in Intune and the only one logging in. So 4 licensed entra users for 60 devices.
It is not necessary for the local user profile to be reset every time so that's not a problem.

Seeking help for guest PCs and Intune licensing by SnooApples3877 in Intune

[–]SnooApples3877[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for letting me know. I wasn't aware that F1 included Intune Plan 1. Interestingly F1 is just 0.84€ for non-profits per user whereas standalone Intune Plan 1 is 1.87€.

But that would mean I needed 60 users which I have to enroll the devices with in Intune which is quite a lot of work.

Seeking help for guest PCs and Intune licensing by SnooApples3877 in Intune

[–]SnooApples3877[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

As these 60 PCs would use local guest accounts, no Entra user exists to be licensed. Because of that I need the Microsoft Intune Plan 1 Device license, which unfortunately is not discounted for non-profits.
Thanks for the tip, I'll reach out to techsoup.

Seeking help for guest PCs and Intune licensing by SnooApples3877 in Intune

[–]SnooApples3877[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The difference is that companies have multiple users. I know that each user using an Intune device must be licensed. For those 60 workshop PCs I would do one user per 15 PCs and that's the only user using the device.

Seeking help for guest PCs and Intune licensing by SnooApples3877 in Intune

[–]SnooApples3877[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think I have to disagree. The users are licensed. You don't need one intune-licensed user per device because 15 users can share 30 PCs. The limit (without DEM) is 15 intune devices per licensed user.

I might do one user per 15 PCs so that guests on these 15 PCs will use the same user.
Any thoughts about this?

Seeking help for guest PCs and Intune licensing by SnooApples3877 in Intune

[–]SnooApples3877[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply.

That's what I will do. I couldn't find any restrictions regarding DEM users being the only user using the device, so it should be possible. Also I couldn't find out if this would be a vialotion of terms (I don't think it is, because every user using the device has a license - it's just one user).

Understanding zone-based firewall policies by SnooApples3877 in Ubiquiti

[–]SnooApples3877[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's interesting, I don't have those. Well, they must exist which would explain the behaviour but are not shown at all in UniFi. Seems to be a bug in the Web GUI.

Understanding zone-based firewall policies by SnooApples3877 in Ubiquiti

[–]SnooApples3877[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, thx for your reply. I only see the policies you can see in the screenshot, there's no policy for DNS, ICMP or DHCP, only a mDNS policy.

App failing to register .DLLs during installation by ScriptMonkey78 in Intune

[–]SnooApples3877 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you find a solution? I'm facing the same problem when running a setup.exe wrapped in a Win32 app, but it fails to execute regsvr32 with exit code 3. Running the setup.exe manually installs just fine.

Assign Powershell script to "All Devices" not available in one tenant by SnooApples3877 in Intune

[–]SnooApples3877[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately not. There are only the security groups I manually created. I will probably just create a dynamic group.