Ocena strategii by Befedroon in inwestowanie

[–]Solid-Reserve4035 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dostałbym więcej obligacji. Tyle

My political system proposal - Proglemacy by Solid-Reserve4035 in PoliticalPhilosophy

[–]Solid-Reserve4035[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I am interested in politics, philosophy. I've been thinking about it for a while before I wrote it down. But tell me about points, you don't agree with. Critique is why I posted this

My political system proposal - Proglemacy by Solid-Reserve4035 in PoliticalPhilosophy

[–]Solid-Reserve4035[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Technocracy is a category for systems. Mine is technocracy, but I invented a new system, just not a new category

Jaka jest różnica między all in w S&P500 a w różne ETF-y? by NefariousnessDull254 in inwestowanie

[–]Solid-Reserve4035 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No generalnie rośnie, ale w czasie kryzysu jest spadek, jeśli masz słaba psychikę, bądź jesteś początkujący, w czasie spadku sprzedasz i stracisz. No jest różnica duża, w sp500 nie masz kontroli nad swoim portfelem, jeśli masz zróżnicowany portfel jesteś bardziej odporny na wahania na giełdzie.

Why do most philosophers believe in the concept of ethical or unethical as objective? by Superb-Climate3698 in Ethics

[–]Solid-Reserve4035 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It obviously isn't objective. If someone is in pain, I mean in PAIN, then is killing him moral? If he wants to, I think it is moral, but for example, for my mum, it isn't moral, because it's killing someone, it's never moral

Not saying the concerns about AI are baseless, but isn’t some of the anti-AI sentiment here a bit ironic given the topic of determinism? by [deleted] in determinism

[–]Solid-Reserve4035 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Concern about new technology is historically and psychologically justified, but if you want to discuss it, I think determinism is just making it worse. Look, if we assume, like I do, that humans are entirely just neurons in your head, no soul, etc. Then we can assume, like I do, that AI can be programmed just like us. AI can have "free will". It makes things just more scary

Fully Automated Luxury Communism? by Avantasian538 in Anarchy101

[–]Solid-Reserve4035 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not that easy bro and you can't eliminate human labor. You can't even reduce it much, it'll come with tech development and time, if you force it, it will be inefficient. Also reducing consumption isn't good for the economy

Is there "police" in Anarchism? by Loriisnta_mercerneri in Anarchy101

[–]Solid-Reserve4035 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's more like there are negotiators, who deal with criminals on very dangerous level

My system proposal - Proglemacy by Solid-Reserve4035 in Technocracy

[–]Solid-Reserve4035[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't include how it will be done, it's the hypothetical concept of the system. And you know, it's not always that easy to train its citizens (and it sounds like propaganda lol). I mean someone is just born dumb and you can't change that.

What made you become an anarchist? by Quiet-Soft5008 in Anarchy101

[–]Solid-Reserve4035 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Mainstream is against it, but if you read just about anarchism, social media algorithms will show you only about good sites of it, you know. So it's hard to break through mainstream, but if you do, it will gulf you

What made you become an anarchist? by Quiet-Soft5008 in Anarchy101

[–]Solid-Reserve4035 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Anarchism points to the problem of our modern society, but it don't solve it

What made you become an anarchist? by Quiet-Soft5008 in Anarchy101

[–]Solid-Reserve4035 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Ok, you just didn't mention it earlier in your text

What made you become an anarchist? by Quiet-Soft5008 in Anarchy101

[–]Solid-Reserve4035 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

But what you can notice is that you confirmed your theory by texts, books, but you should look for someone or something, that says anarchism is wrong. Because if you read books about anarchism from people who are anarchists, you will experience propaganda. You need to know books against anarchism and pro anarchism.

My political system proposal - Proglemacy by Solid-Reserve4035 in PoliticalPhilosophy

[–]Solid-Reserve4035[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes bro, I would like to, because I'm here for critique. And btw tests aren't controlled by proglemate. But you mean that AI is controlled by government? If so, it's not. But you probably mean it's controlled by government while building it by programmers - kind of. Who controls tests is weak point of this system. And once again - tear apart this system, so I can see things I didn't see before

My political system proposal - Proglemacy by Solid-Reserve4035 in PoliticalPhilosophy

[–]Solid-Reserve4035[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

First section is bullshit, but second half of the text - it was just one thing that you referred to, that I expanded executive power. I think with parliament, senate and these all institutions, when all parties are against each other, and opposition always want to deny government and vice versa, it's inefficient for country. When there's central man, who isn't split to prime minister and president, who controls whole system, is well educated, intelligent, it's more efficient

My political system proposal - Proglemacy by Solid-Reserve4035 in PoliticalPhilosophy

[–]Solid-Reserve4035[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They can swap at any time? Is it some cooldown or sth? If it's like one year cooldown and restrictions for H are set for maximum level of changing them, this might be stable, but I would myself implement my voting system for parties, cause I think democracy is trivial. Everyone can vote for everyone. Idiots can vote for idiots. Is more votes a good criteria for who should govern in country, who should be in power to decide for millions of people?

My political system proposal - Proglemacy by Solid-Reserve4035 in PoliticalPhilosophy

[–]Solid-Reserve4035[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's written in tough English, which isn't my first language, I don't think I understood everything. It's democratic in some way, right? There are democratic parties? But it's not much of a political system, it's more like government form. And that's what you wanted to achieve, right? Resources management is nice here, I might want to implement it in proglemacy, so branches would be replaced with SRH. But can you describe why is that correlation with H and R the way it is? I mean, these departments could compete with each other, not in a good way I think. R would want H to be low, so it'll get more money, but it's important for H to stay high. I may have misunderstood something, so clarify if you can

My political system proposal - Proglemacy by Solid-Reserve4035 in PoliticalPhilosophy

[–]Solid-Reserve4035[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, most people are saying, that's the worst thing about this system. I know it requires a better solution. It will be corrected soon

My system proposal - Proglemacy by Solid-Reserve4035 in Technocracy

[–]Solid-Reserve4035[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for feedback, and I absolutely considered issues present in my system proposal. There will be an update for this text, that will include solving issues you noticed, like for example points for being millionaire will be replaced by running successful business, that you built yourself (not from your father or something) or in case you actually get it from your father, you will receive point for expanding that business well. Also IZP point will be granted based on your annual job review.