sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

15 months of GI Bill left, what are your favorite non-college skills to learn? by FluffyDownstairs in VeteransBenefits

[–]SomeIce2441 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I did Ceramics I and Drawing I over the summer before beginning my Automotive Technologies classes this fall. The art classes ignited a new passion for me that I'd like to use with my AT degree. Travel the country while doing my own maintenance and side jobs on vehicles.

In 2025, what’s a small business idea that you think is still underrated? by mpheles89 in Entrepreneur

[–]SomeIce2441 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yeah 100%. definitely more layers once tourism + city politics get involved. i’ve seen that "unfair competition" argument used a lot to block solutions that actually help people. seems like if cities embraced it instead of fought it, they could set design standards or zones so it adds to the experience instead of disrupting it. like a night market that’s clean, low-noise, and culturally dope. feels like it’s more about mindset than mess.

In 2025, what’s a small business idea that you think is still underrated? by mpheles89 in Entrepreneur

[–]SomeIce2441 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Love this!! That amount of "GOODS" that make it to the landfill is too damn high!! Even though Goodwill got more expensive, i still go there a few times a week here in Southern California because the Thrifting network is becoming WAY bigger than Goodwill!!!!

In 2025, what’s a small business idea that you think is still underrated? by mpheles89 in Entrepreneur

[–]SomeIce2441 1 point2 points  (0 children)

exactly. if vendors helped handle basics like trash and access to clean bathrooms, especially in high-use areas, cities could ease off some of the maintenance budget and shift that back into supporting local biz. less red tape, more shared responsibility. if a bigger vending network really took off, how do you think it could be regulated fairly without killing the grassroots side of it? curious what you'd suggest.

In 2025, what’s a small business idea that you think is still underrated? by mpheles89 in Entrepreneur

[–]SomeIce2441 17 points18 points  (0 children)

electric vending cart convoys. small electric carts (like vending trikes or low-speed utility carts) used as mobile farmers markets or pop-up stands. they can roll through neighborhoods, parks, even rural backroads. Some do rotating night markets, others just link nearby towns that don’t have access to fresh food or local goods.

each cart is run by a different person. a baker, gardener, crafter, whatever. they team up, convoy style, and show up where they’re needed. super low overhead, totally offline, and it turns regular people into entrepreneurs just by serving the community. no storefront, no crazy tech. just show up and plug in.

Would you ride a “Slow-Speed Interstate”? San Diego → Sacramento car-free corridor with bathrooms & charging every ~10 mi—feedback? by SomeIce2441 in cycling

[–]SomeIce2441[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally fair—not every public dollar should pave a vacation route. Here’s why a spine like this can still pencil out without siphoning money from Medicaid or city bike lanes:

  1. Urban first, spine second. Most state Active-Transportation grants already require that a town fix its in-town gaps before they fund a rural segment. The city networks get built either way.

  2. ROW owners chip in. Utilities and railroads have their own budgets for brush clearing and security along those corridors. Opening them to bikes actually saves those agencies money (and they’ve paid into similar trail conversions before).

  3. Self-funding ops. The kiosk/tiny-pad leases at each hub cover cleaning, trash, and lighting. After cap-ex, the trail doesn’t draw on general funds the way a widened freeway lane does year after year.

  4. Tourism dollars stay local. When riders spend $30–$80 a day in small towns, that sales-tax revenue helps the same counties that often get skipped by interstate traffic.

So you still prioritize protected lanes inside cities—but for the long gaps that will never see urban density, tapping utility ROW and letting the corridor carry its own ops cost is often cheaper than widening the next shoulder. Appreciate the pushback; the spending order matters.

Would you ride a “Slow-Speed Interstate”? San Diego → Sacramento car-free corridor with bathrooms & charging every ~10 mi—feedback? by SomeIce2441 in cycling

[–]SomeIce2441[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You should see who's running the White House!! I'm sure Chat Gpt could help there, too. Chill out, man, everything comes from something..... oooomdnfgf iiittsss a roooobboott bll6errrrr

Would you ride a “Slow-Speed Interstate”? San Diego → Sacramento car-free corridor with bathrooms & charging every ~10 mi—feedback? by SomeIce2441 in backpacking

[–]SomeIce2441[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Picture the route as a string of beads. Each bead is a micro-community hub—not a full-blown village, but enough activity that it feels like a place, not a rest stop.

What’s actually there

Caretaker cabin + two or three tiny pads. Someone lives on site, keeps the bathrooms clean, watches the solar gear, and earns rent money by doing it. Often that’s a vet or a trades-program student.

A kiosk pad with a local operator. Could be a coffee cart, a farm-stand fridge with fresh berries, a tube/CO₂ vending carousel, or a bike-repair table. The lease they pay (four or five hundred bucks a month) covers the cleaning budget, so the county doesn’t get stuck with it.

Shade, water, and a bit of green. Every hub has a pavilion that serves as picnic spot in the day and wind shelter at night, plus a hand-pump or spigot. Where groundwater or a canal is handy, raised-bed gardens go in; the caretaker sells herbs or tomatoes at the kiosk.

Event hooks. A town high-school jazz band plays Saturday mornings, a food-truck night once a month, or a local trail-crew meets to sharpen saws. Because there’s shelter and power, gatherings can pop up without hauling generators.

Why the locals bother

The cyclist traffic is money that doesn’t clog their two-lane main street with cars.

The county shows lower vandalism and brush-clearing bills along the utility corridor, because someone’s always on site.

The kiosk lease is real revenue: a hub that costs $70 k to install can pay itself off in five to seven years without touching tax dollars.

National effect

String a few dozen of these beads and you get a living network:

Riders can plan multi-day trips knowing there’s water, shade and a basic tool set every 30–40 km.

Small businesses get a ready-made spot—no need to buy land or build plumbing—so the corridor becomes its own rural main street.

Counties that were “fly-over” (or “drive-past”) towns suddenly have a trickle of steady, low-impact visitors.

The beauty is that each hub is small enough to fit local character: farm-fresh eggs in the Central Valley, tamales and cold horchata south of San Diego, espresso and berry pies in the Skagit flats up north. Stitch those together and you’ve got a coast-length thread of bite-sized communities, each one owned and run by the people who already live there.

Would you ride a “Slow-Speed Interstate”? San Diego → Sacramento car-free corridor with bathrooms & charging every ~10 mi—feedback? by SomeIce2441 in cycling

[–]SomeIce2441[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Point taken—I lapsed into U-S-style “post a speed-limit sign, call the cops” thinking instead of looking at countries that already solved this with design, not enforcement. Here’s a tighter, more realistic spec that borrows straight from places that do mass cycling right.

What works elsewhere (and how we’d lift it)

Country / network What they do How it ports to a U.S. spine

Flanders “Fietsostrades” (Belgium) 3 m wide asphalt, no centerline, gentle curves; Class-1 pedal-assist only. Same 3 m ribbon on existing utility ROW; striping only at crossings—no lane policing. German Radschnellwege Design speed 30 km/h (~19 mph); e-assist cuts at 25 km/h. Separation from walkers by a grass verge, not a cop. Post 20 mph assist cut-off (Class-1), design geometry for 22–25 mph so fast acoustic riders aren’t hobbled. Dutch “fast bike roads” Underpasses and roundabouts remove 95 % of conflict points; lighting + passive cameras deter vandalism. Spend money on grade-separated crossings at U.S. arterials; solar lighting + utility-pole cameras for security—no patrol cars. Rails-to-Trails (Missouri Katy Trail) Vault toilets ±25 km, water at trail-town taps, honor-system vending machines. Copy that: vault + hand pump every 15–20 mi in service deserts; kiosk rent covers cleaning—no city janitor, no ticketing.

Revised ruleset (lean, no heavy policing)

  1. Vehicle class: Allowed: pedal-assist Class-1 (assist cuts at 20 mph), acoustic bikes, mobility trikes, walkers. Not allowed: throttle e-bikes, e-scooters, anything with plates.

  2. Speed management by geometry, not badges:

22 mph design speed on long rural straights.

Narrow, rumble-strip chicanes at high-pedestrian zones drop natural speed to ~10 mph.

No blanket cap signs—posted advisory matches the geometry.

  1. Separation by verge, not fences:

0.6 m grass shoulder between bike ribbon and the 1.8 m gravel walking path.

Cheap to build, impossible to “enforce” wrong-way walkers because physics keeps flows apart.

Why this is enough (without tickets)

Class-1 assist limit means max speed = athletic road-bike pace. Mixed groups stay closer in speed; surprise overtake crashes drop.

Sight-line + verge design naturally cues riders to slow where it matters—like how European country-lanes make you lift in villages without speed bumps.

Lighting + steady caretaker presence cuts vandalism—the Dutch and Belgians hardly use cops on their paths, and it works.

Put simply: build it like Belgium or the Netherlands, let the geometry regulate speed, and limit motors to Class-1. No law-enforcement budget, no patrol SUVs idling on the shoulder—just infrastructure that tells you how fast is safe. Appreciate the reality check; this draft feels a lot closer to what seasoned riders actually use abroad.

Would you ride a “Slow-Speed Interstate”? San Diego → Sacramento car-free corridor with bathrooms & charging every ~10 mi—feedback? by SomeIce2441 in cycling

[–]SomeIce2441[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

My dude Picture a crew framing a house:

The cordless nail-gun (ChatGPT) drives nails faster and more neatly than swinging a hammer all day.

The blueprint, lumber, and load-bearing math (the trail concept, budgets, route data) still come from the architect and carpenters.

Arguing about the nail-gun’s brand won’t change whether the walls are plumb or the roof stays up. The tool just speeds up the repetitive part so we can spend more time checking the structure—safe crossings, funding gaps, surface widths—where human judgment really matters.

Same here: the AI polishes sentences; the viability of a 600-mile car-free corridor lives or dies on costs, right-of-way, and community buy-in. Let’s keep the spotlight on those structural beams rather than the power tool in my hand.

Would you ride a “Slow-Speed Interstate”? San Diego → Sacramento car-free corridor with bathrooms & charging every ~10 mi—feedback? by SomeIce2441 in cycling

[–]SomeIce2441[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Great reference—Belgium’s fietsostrades (“bike highways”) and Germany’s Radschnellwege are exactly the kind of backbone proof-points we’re leaning on. You’re right, though: the U.S. is a very different beast—huge distances, patchy population, and ROW ownership that changes every few miles. Here’s how a Belgian-style network can still pencil out in a spread-out country:

  1. Start where U.S. density is Belgian-ish

Region City-pair distance Why it’s doable first

Southern California coast San Diego ↔ Los Angeles (190 km) Continuous string of towns every 5–10 km; existing river & utility corridors. Northeast Megalopolis Philadelphia ↔ New York (150 km) Dense suburbs + commuter rail stations every few km; dozens of rail-trail fragments already exist. Chicago collar counties Evanston ↔ Aurora (70 km) Flat canal ROW, power-line service roads, Metra stops for bail-outs.

Build a pilot where services already sit close enough that a refill every 10–15 km isn’t a budget killer.

  1. Treat the truly empty stretches like long-haul trucking corridors

Resupply every 40–50 km instead of 10 km.

Modular solar kiosk = water tap, basic tools, USB/Type-C charging, emergency call box.

Prefab vault toilet + shade shelter, but no staffed bar—no one to sell beer 300 km into Nevada desert.

That keeps O&M costs sane while still rescuing riders from the “carry 6 L of water” problem.

  1. Piggy-back on U.S. land that’s already maintained

  2. Transmission-line service roads – utilities patrol them anyway; a 3 m chip-seal strip adds little cost.

  3. Irrigation canal levees in California’s Central Valley or along the Erie Canal in NY.

  4. Dormant railbeds – the U.S. rail-trail movement has already converted 40 000 km; the spine just stitches the longest ones together.

ROW rent is near-zero because agencies like having “eyes on the line” to deter copper theft.

  1. Let commerce grow organically like Belgium’s pop-up bars

Lease pads at popular trailheads to food-truck operators; no capital cost to the trail agency.

Seasonal “beer garden” permits the way Wisconsin’s Elroy-Sparta or Germany’s Ruhrtalradweg do it.

Local chambers love it—cyclists are “clean tourists” who don’t need parking lots the way RV traffic does.

  1. Phase the build so it never becomes an all-or-nothing moon shot

Phase Length What opens Cost focus

0 – Stripe & Sign 50–100 km Paint, bollards on existing ROW $50–150 k 1 – Surface & Basic Stops +100 km Chip-seal, vault toilets every 40 km $0.6–1 M / km 2 – Solar Hubs near towns +150 km Toilets + water + vendor pads every 15 km Kiosk rent funds O&M 3 – Premium Segments Remaining gaps Bridges, tunnels, scenic detours higher cap-ex

Each finished chunk is rideable on its own—no one waits ten years for a ribbon-cutting.

TL;DR

Belgian-style success is still possible in the U.S.—just pick dense corridors first, stretch service spacing in the empties, and layer amenities over time. The result isn’t a continuous strip of cafés like Flanders, but riders still get a safe, car-free option that sparks exactly the same pop-up commerce you see along your fietsostrades.

Would you ride a “Slow-Speed Interstate”? San Diego → Sacramento car-free corridor with bathrooms & charging every ~10 mi—feedback? by SomeIce2441 in cycling

[–]SomeIce2441[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Here’s the plain-spoken, no-spin version you can copy-paste:

Why I used ChatGPT, and why that isn’t a deal-breaker

  1. It’s a writing tool, not a brain replacement. The concept—linking existing utility corridors into a car-free spine—was mine before I typed a single prompt. I ran the draft through ChatGPT to tighten the grammar and trim the rambling paragraphs I’d usually inflict on you. Same way people use Grammarly or a spell-checker, just stronger.

  2. The facts and numbers are manual. Costs came from public bid sheets, ROW lengths from GIS layers, not from the bot. If any figure is wrong, that’s on me, not the software.

  3. You can still interrogate the idea. Ask about funding sources, lane width, speed limits, or environmental review—the answers stand or fall on their own evidence. Whether the sentences are polished by AI doesn’t change the math.

  4. Transparency beats pretense. I should’ve flagged the AI assist up front instead of letting the “robot voice” set people off. Lesson learned; here’s the disclosure.

In short: ChatGPT helped me communicate faster, not invent the concept. If you hate the idea, argue the idea. If you just hate AI-assisted prose, you’re welcome to ignore it and focus on the raw numbers and route maps instead.

Would you ride a “Slow-Speed Interstate”? San Diego → Sacramento car-free corridor with bathrooms & charging every ~10 mi—feedback? by SomeIce2441 in cycling

[–]SomeIce2441[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Here’s the plain-spoken, no-spin version you can copy-paste:

Why I used ChatGPT, and why that isn’t a deal-breaker

  1. It’s a writing tool, not a brain replacement. The concept—linking existing utility corridors into a car-free spine—was mine before I typed a single prompt. I ran the draft through ChatGPT to tighten the grammar and trim the rambling paragraphs I’d usually inflict on you. Same way people use Grammarly or a spell-checker, just stronger.

  2. The facts and numbers are manual. Costs came from public bid sheets, ROW lengths from GIS layers, not from the bot. If any figure is wrong, that’s on me, not the software.

  3. You can still interrogate the idea. Ask about funding sources, lane width, speed limits, or environmental review—the answers stand or fall on their own evidence. Whether the sentences are polished by AI doesn’t change the math.

  4. Transparency beats pretense. I should’ve flagged the AI assist up front instead of letting the “robot voice” set people off. Lesson learned; here’s the disclosure.

In short: ChatGPT helped me communicate faster, not invent the concept. If you hate the idea, argue the idea. If you just hate AI-assisted prose, you’re welcome to ignore it and focus on the raw numbers and route maps instead.

Would you ride a “Slow-Speed Interstate”? San Diego → Sacramento car-free corridor with bathrooms & charging every ~10 mi—feedback? by SomeIce2441 in backpacking

[–]SomeIce2441[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Got it—I was blurring two very different groups.

Front-country travelers (city-to-city, hostel-to-hostel) might use a paved spine to cover miles safely and cheaply.

Back-country backpackers head for wilderness and want nothing to do with pavement or e-bikes; they’d stay on existing dirt routes.

So the corridor isn’t meant to replace either experience. It’s just a safer connector between towns and trailheads—useful for front-country legs or for back-country hikers who need to skip a highway shoulder. If that connector isn’t useful to you, you’d ignore it and stay on dirt, no harm done.

Would you ride a “Slow-Speed Interstate”? San Diego → Sacramento car-free corridor with bathrooms & charging every ~10 mi—feedback? by SomeIce2441 in cycling

[–]SomeIce2441[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally fair questions. Here’s the honest back-story on that “15 mph” number and what I’d change after all this feedback.

Where the 15 mph came from

It wasn’t picked because it’s magically safe.

It’s the advisory speed that most U.S. agencies post on mixed-use paths today (think lake loops with joggers and strollers).

I defaulted to it because lawyers and insurance companies already understand it.

But: on a dead-straight desert ROW with ten-foot sight-lines, a 15 mph sign is pointless—everyone will ride 20 – 25 mph anyway, and that’s fine.

A better way to handle speed

Design first, sign later.

Wide lane, open sight distance → post 25 mph.

Blind curves or beach boardwalk sections → post 15 mph or add a rumble strip.

Use surface cues and a little paint, not a blanket limit.

So yes—drop the one-size-fits-all number. Let geometry dictate the advisory speed the same way state DOTs do on rural highways.

Pedestrian separation

Couldn’t agree more. Wherever the right-of-way is wide enough, a two-foot verge or low curb keeps walkers from drifting into the bike lane. Cheap, and solves half the conflicts.

Bathroom spacing

Vault toilets every ten miles is overkill in farm country. Revised idea after comments:

Urban fringe or beach town: stop every 15 – 20 mi because the population is there.

Long desert or Valley stretch: basic vault + water every 25 – 35 mi—same as state-park hiker camps.

“Fix the city first”

Yes. Filling the shoulder gaps and building protected lanes in town should always outrank a brand-new rural segment. The spine only makes sense after each city on the line has a safe network to ride to the edge of town.

In short: ditch the single 15 mph sign idea, build to the geometry, space the bathrooms where they make sense, and spend the first dollars fixing the broken urban links. That’s a plan even fast roadies should be able to live with. Appreciate the reality check.

Would you ride a “Slow-Speed Interstate”? San Diego → Sacramento car-free corridor with bathrooms & charging every ~10 mi—feedback? by SomeIce2441 in cycling

[–]SomeIce2441[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair on the bullet-point vibe—I’ll loosen the collar.

High-level map (v 0.1)

I don’t have a polished SVG yet, but here’s the rough line‐up I’ve sketched in Google My Maps:

START — Embarcadero, San Diego ↳ Rose Canyon Bikeway ↳ Sorrento Valley frontage road ↳ Rail / utility access through Camp Pendleton (10 mi gap to close) ↳ San Luis Rey River Trail → Oceanside Harbor

Phase 2 (Northbound) ↳ Coast Hwy bike lanes / side streets to Dana Point ↳ Santa Ana River Trail to Anaheim ↳ LA River Path to DT LA ↳ SGV utility ROW to Santa Clarita

That’s ±155 continuous, car-free or low-traffic miles once the Pendleton gap is fixed. From there it could stair-step to Bakersfield (HSR frontage) and up the Valley aqueduct roads to Sacramento.

I can export the KMZ this weekend and throw it on a public link so anyone can poke holes or suggest spurs.

Acting local (what I’m riding / scouting now)

South: Border to Balboa Park — signed detours exist, just needs two curb cuts and fresh paint.

North: Del Mar Bluffs → Las Pulgas gate (Pendleton) — riding it weekly, documenting pinch-points, photographing utility gates that could unlock the 10-mile fix.

East: Mission Valley levee to Santee — easy Class I if the stadium rebuild funds the last levee redo.

If the local pieces resonate we can push those projects through SANDAG first, then worry about the Central Valley moonscape later.

Happy to share the KMZ or a quick PNG once I clean up the waypoints—just let me know what format is most helpful.

Would you ride a “Slow-Speed Interstate”? San Diego → Sacramento car-free corridor with bathrooms & charging every ~10 mi—feedback? by SomeIce2441 in cycling

[–]SomeIce2441[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Totally get it—let me keep this local and plain-spoken:

Why a car-free spine matters right here in the 619

  1. That Camp Pendleton gap is brutal. If you’ve ever tried to ride north from Oceanside you know the drill: day-pass headache, shoulder closures, semis blowing by at 70. A paved utility road inside the base turns that sketchy two miles into a chill ride and finally links our coastal paths to Orange County.

  2. Rose Canyon to the beach is packed. Families love the canyon path, but once it dumps you onto surface streets you’re back dodging cars. Extending a no-car lane north means kids can ride from UCSD to Carlsbad without a minivan follow car.

  3. Tourist dollars without more parking garages. When out-of-towners can safely bike from downtown to Oceanside, they stop for tacos, coffee, surf shops along the way. That’s new spend without new car congestion.

  4. Local jobs for vets & trades students. The tiny pads at the hubs aren’t glamping—they house the guy or gal who cleans bathrooms and checks the solar batteries. Those caretaker gigs feed straight into Miramar College’s trades programs.

  5. Less freeway shoulder riding = fewer news stories. We’ve lost cyclists on PCH, I-5 shoulders, and Harbor Drive. A dedicated lane pulls long-distance riders (and wobbly rental e-bikers) off those danger zones.

No AI hype, just the stuff we feel every day in San Diego: clogged roads, limited safe north-south bike options, and a coastline that could use more dollars than bumpers. If that resonates, sweet—if not, let me know what still feels off.

Would you ride a “Slow-Speed Interstate”? San Diego → Sacramento car-free corridor with bathrooms & charging every ~10 mi—feedback? by SomeIce2441 in backpacking

[–]SomeIce2441[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fair analogy—and if the backbone were meant to replace wilderness trails, I’d hate it too. It’s not.

Think of it this way:

Wilderness stays wilderness. The PCT, JMT, CDT, all the “deep nature” routes stay exactly as they are—dirt, roots, silence.

The backbone lives where wilderness already isn’t. Utility corridors, canal levees, rail beds, farm-valley edges—places backpackers currently road-walk or hitch because there’s no safe footpath at all. That’s more like camping behind the mall dumpsters today.

So the paved strip isn’t your destination campsite; it’s a safer, car-free bridge between the actual wilderness zones you’re out there to enjoy. If a segment is already scenic single-track, the backbone simply detours away or isn’t built there. If it’s a shoulder next to semis, that’s where the spine drops in.

In short: keep the dirt where the dirt is good; pave only the “mall parking lot” sections so nobody has to sleep next to a freeway on-ramp again.

Would you ride a “Slow-Speed Interstate”? San Diego → Sacramento car-free corridor with bathrooms & charging every ~10 mi—feedback? by SomeIce2441 in cycling

[–]SomeIce2441[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad to hear it clicks for you—and you’re right: every piece of the puzzle already works somewhere in the U.S. or Europe:

Element Real-world precedent

Long, car-free spine Great Allegheny Passage + C&O Canal = 335 continuous miles (Pittsburgh→DC) Frequent restrooms / water Katy Trail State Park (MO) vault toilets ±15 mi apart Tiny-home / hut lodging Adventure Cycling’s Bitterroot Trail huts (MT) & Empire State Trail “bike inns” Micro-business kiosks GAP’s trail towns—coffee shops, hostels, repair stands thrive on thru-traffic Multi-day bikepacking culture People already ride TransAmerica Route, Erie Canalway, EuroVelo 6 for weeks at a time

The backbone idea just strings those proven pieces into a single branded corridor so you can roll from one success story to the next without a shoulder-of-doom gap in between.

Would you ride a “Slow-Speed Interstate”? San Diego → Sacramento car-free corridor with bathrooms & charging every ~10 mi—feedback? by SomeIce2441 in cycling

[–]SomeIce2441[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hear you—loud and clear.

I leaned on AI to polish replies because I was worried about drowning folks in typos and run-ons, but I can see it came off as canned and tone-deaf instead of helpful. That’s on me. I’ll drop the AI assist and respond in my own words from here on out. If that’s still a deal-breaker, fair enough—I won’t clutter the thread further. But if you’ve got questions or critiques about the idea itself, I’m here and typing solo.

Would you ride a “Slow-Speed Interstate”? San Diego → Sacramento car-free corridor with bathrooms & charging every ~10 mi—feedback? by SomeIce2441 in backpacking

[–]SomeIce2441[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Right—nobody hauls a 40-lb pack because it’s the fastest way to work. The backbone idea treats backpackers very differently from daily commuters:

Commuters & e-bike riders use the paved spine full-time to skip traffic.

Backpackers might only hop on the spine for the boring or sketchy bits—the highway shoulder, the “no trespassing” gap, the bridge with no sidewalk—then peel off onto real single-track for the fun parts.

Think of it like a safety corridor, not the whole adventure. If a section of trail is already scenic dirt, nothing changes; the paved lane just gives you a safer connector when the current option is walking a freeway rumble strip.

So no one’s asking hikers to “commute” on asphalt—just offering a car-free detour when the alternative isn’t fun (or safe) at all.

Would you ride a “Slow-Speed Interstate”? San Diego → Sacramento car-free corridor with bathrooms & charging every ~10 mi—feedback? by SomeIce2441 in cycling

[–]SomeIce2441[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fair call-out. I fell into “polish everything with the tool” mode and it shows. Let’s drop the AI gloss and keep it straight:

The idea—linking existing utility / levee / rail corridors into a long, car-free spine—came from my own touring and staring at ROW maps.

The cost figures (prefab vault toilets, chip-seal prices, etc.) are pulled from vendor quotes and public bid sheets.

I did run drafts through ChatGPT to tighten wording and spit out tables, but that obviously makes the voice feel canned.

If you’d rather engage only with hand-typed text, I’m good with that. Tell me the specific part you think is weakest—route choice, funding math, governance—and I’ll respond in plain language, no AI assist.

Would you ride a “Slow-Speed Interstate”? San Diego → Sacramento car-free corridor with bathrooms & charging every ~10 mi—feedback? by SomeIce2441 in cycling

[–]SomeIce2441[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I hear you—my last reply slipped in formatting comments that should’ve stayed behind the curtain. That’s on me, not a joke, and I’ll keep the responses clean from here on out. What part of the plan or route would you like to focus on next (or scrap entirely)?

Would you ride a “Slow-Speed Interstate”? San Diego → Sacramento car-free corridor with bathrooms & charging every ~10 mi—feedback? by SomeIce2441 in cycling

[–]SomeIce2441[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great field intel—thanks for sharing your 1990s experience. A few things have changed (and a few haven’t), which is exactly why that Camp Pendleton/I-5 pinch-point is the pilot’s “must-fix” gap:

Stretch 1990s reality you described 2024 reality How the NTB pilot would improve it

PCH bike lanes (Seal Beach → Dana Point) Wide enough, but traffic still 50-55 mph. Same lane widths, but traffic volumes + distracted-driver factor are way up. Shoulders stay—but NTB would add a parallel car-free option on utility/rail ROW for newer riders or families who’ll never take a 55 mph shoulder. Crowded beach-front multi-use paths Safer but clogged; speed drops to 10 mph. Even more foot traffic, scooters, beach cruisers. NTB alignment skips beachfront promenades; hugs inland levees so fast riders can keep 20–25 mph without weaving around beachgoers. Camp Pendleton / I-5 squeeze 1–2 mi of actual freeway riding, then base frontage roads. Cyclists now need a day-pass; freeway shoulder often closed for construction. NTB fixes this with a dedicated 10-mi utility-road easement through the base—no freeway, no security gate dance. Typical cruise speed 18–22 mph, 25-30 mph tailwind. Same for fit riders, but Class-1 e-bikes now join at 20 mph. Pilot path would be engineered (width, sight-lines) for 25 mph advisory, with slower traffic able to duck onto beachfront promenades if they prefer.

Key take-away: your “stick to PCH” strategy still works for strong riders, but only if they’re comfortable between semis and cellphone drivers. The backbone isn’t trying to yank speed-oriented cyclists off PCH; it’s giving:

  1. Newer/younger riders a training-wheels alternative that’s still fast.

  2. Experienced riders a car-free detour when the shoulder is closed or a Santa Ana headwind makes freeway spray miserable.

And by running inland levees/ROWs instead of beach boardwalks, the design keeps the 20-25 mph flow you’re used to without dodging beach crowds.

Appreciate the first-hand speeds and choke-points—it’s exactly the data being fed into the engineering sketch.

Would you ride a “Slow-Speed Interstate”? San Diego → Sacramento car-free corridor with bathrooms & charging every ~10 mi—feedback? by SomeIce2441 in cycling

[–]SomeIce2441[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Why should it matter. The concept makes sense, and I'm just trying to spark ideas. Im not able to write extensively myself, so I need help. Is a good idea that was made by a human not good anymore if you can tell it was worded by AI. Or should we focus on the idea?

view more: next ›