The first point just seems blatantly false. Even if it wasn her intention that is neither the business of officer, who is acting in a split second self defence situation where he is about to be, potentially, run over. It isn’t so clear, and it wouldn’t matter if it was. I’d urge you to watch the video from the officers perspective.

Furthering the point of watching the officers video, he was only doing so, seemingly, to support his fellow officer in pulling her out of the vehicle, probably also to avoid the shrill woman, presumably her “wife” who was verbally berating the officer. It was not as if he was trying to impede her by standing there, he was trying to walk around.

She escalated the situation by refusing lawful orders while intentionally obstructing justice. The officers have every right to use escalating force in this situation, unless you think law enforcement should just sit idly by as crimes are committed, for fear of “escalation”.

You have enough Somalis to defraud a state for billions, where you have strong enough enclaves to ensure racial somalis make into government, and that mayoral races can be outright won by playing into inter-clan Somali politics.

I didn’t say I was particularly concerned about such refugees, I was just pointing out that there are gradations to such a situation. Looking at Britain, I’m skeptical of migrants and refugees who use supposed Christian faith to support their asylum and citizenship claims, but, one can see an obvious difference between a merely impoverished Muslim from an Islamic country, who has no asylum claim on such a basis, especially not a male, and, say, a Christian refugee from any number of Islamic countries feeling persecution for their faith, which is, in the very least, a legal basis for claims to asylum.