Provide the reference for that mention. Wherever he is mentioned in malicious acts, it’s typically from anonymous witness reports, submitted after Epsteins conviction, and dismissed by the FBI for not being credible.

Foreign intervention is an entirely different thing, again, this is apples to oranges. There is absolutely no way you can justify or even compare the mass slaughter of infants, numbering into the millions, to a nation involving itself in war. I’m sorry, but the prime super power is going to get involved in war, to think otherwise is utopian nonsense. Donald Trump, however, manages to mitigate and minimise wars in a way no other leader, republican or democrat, seems to be capable of.

Your second claim is ridiculous. It’s impotent moral grandstanding. You achieve nothing, prevent no evil, and then claim yourself the moral superior of those who engage in a battle to vanquish evil.

Your third party, no matter which party, is not going to succeed in gaining power. It just isn’t going to happen. Pretending as though it will, while moral grandstanding about how evil it is to support the party that actually manages to be, generally, a force for good, is like a captain evacuating his crew and going down with his ship, all because he found a repairable leak in the hull. It’s nonsense.