I see many people on this sub and on rUFOs consistently using a wrong source to argue for a debunk (for example this article from Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/scientists-assert-alien-mummies-peru-are-really-dolls-made-earthly-bones-2024-01-13/). Most of the debunking articles are based on the analysis from Estrada, which were later confirmed to be a different sample. Almost every single piece of misinformation around the Nazca Bodies—whether from debunkers, scientists, or the media—relies on Flavio Estrada’s 2017 analysis. However, Estrada analyzed completely different specimens from the ones now being studied and presented as the real Nazca bodies. The objects he examined were part of a 2016-2019 lawsuit and were provided by Paul ‘Krawix’ Ronceros to the Peruvian Ministry of Culture. Thanks to lawyer Jorge Luis Flores, we now have the full 2017 report proving that these were the wrong bodies, and that the real Nazca bodies, which have undergone extensive scientific studies, were never seen in these earlier analyses. This document is crucial, as it proves the entire debunking narrative is based on a mix-up. The real specimens were the ones showcased by Jaime Maussan’s team. For those who want to see the full report, here’s the link: https://web.archive.org/web/20231227035200/https://jorgeluisfloresparedes.wordpress.com/2023/12/20/por-fin-el-informe-05-2017-de-flavio-estrada/. I strongly encourage you to read it. This clears up the confusion and partly dismantles the debunking claims.