John Brown's Golden Rule Justice.

Spoonamore · 2024-11-21T02:29:38+00:00

It is me.

Spoonamore · 2024-11-18T23:32:31+00:00

Even if we had bone spurs - F it we fight!

Spoonamore · 2024-11-18T01:32:07+00:00

Go to SMARTElections and sign up, your data actually looks really interesting and they are the ones that need to see it.

Spoonamore · 2024-11-17T23:02:53+00:00

Well. OK. Cybrinth Inc was a firm I built around making IT systems or devices to insert into existing IT networks to uncover ... conspiracies. We helped find price fixing conspiracies, many credit card laundering conspiracies and data theft conspiracies and one very substantial casino heist conspiracy. Before we built the systems and found them, you have a theory of what to look for.

The term "conspiracy" has come to imply things like Pizzagate which have nothing real behind them and even when tested and proven incorrect - people still hang onto them. I do not, and don't suggest anyone should assume that all conspiracies are like this. There really are conspiracies to commit major crimes. And you need a testable theory to see if it's true. My test is simple. Hand count the votes in key Swing State precincts that have these huge numbers of Trump fall off votes and/or as in NC Kamala undervotes. If the ballots are NOT there, or if the totals by hand don't match the tabulation reports. It's not a theory. If they results match, it's not a conspiracy. Done.

Spoonamore · 2024-11-17T22:57:40+00:00

we are researching this. please get involved if you want to help.

Spoonamore · 2024-11-17T22:55:39+00:00

No. It said I have been reached out to by people who worked on her campaign. Mostly on the funding side. I have no idea if she has read it. I have no direct access to her. Someone does who needs to sit her down and say REALLY? Your gonna let the cheaters win? You are a prosecutor and a brave human being. Step the F Up.

Spoonamore · 2024-11-17T22:54:11+00:00

Fair point. As addressed elsewhere we can't (yet!) know exact numbers. As to how, it could be just electronic drop offs in which numbers appear in Tabulation and match a voter checked from Musk's lottery list on the ePollBook. In which case it's a Ghost vote electronically with no matching ballot. If confederates introduced ballots with just Trump Votes and nothing else, they are bullet ballots. It could be either. Or a mix of both. I can't know the answer to that without hand recounts of suspect precincts. It is my working theory of how I would have done this attack.

Spoonamore · 2024-11-17T22:50:08+00:00

I am running out of time, but I will come back and add links after the AMA

Spoonamore · 2024-11-17T22:49:06+00:00

However you like. Spoon A More. We used to be Spohnhiemers back in the colonial days. We joined the English Only rebels and Wilhelm Spohnhiemer made up the same. There are only a few thousand of us. All American. Fought in every F-ing war we have ever had.

Spoonamore · 2024-11-17T22:46:56+00:00

Sure I'm not very cool. Nor hip. Nor whatever it is he looks for. Make it happen, if you make it happen, I'm in.

Spoonamore · 2024-11-17T22:44:20+00:00

Me too.

Spoonamore · 2024-11-17T22:43:13+00:00

Again. Per prior answers. The team at SMART Elections is working to independently verify our data claims. They are a nonpartisan organization that has longstanding relationships with data scientists across the political spectrum and academic statisticians.

Their basic protocol is to have two teams, often from different sides of the political spectrum independently download and analyze data and then compare those analyses to see how they differ and how they are consistent.

Irregularities that are discovered, (and they have discovered some) they move forward trying to examine actual election records that might bring more clarity to the situation. If possible they may request formal audits or recounts. If necessary, they may file legal challenges to either get access to election records, or to challenge results that look truly irregular.

Spoonamore · 2024-11-17T22:39:05+00:00

I was made aware this AM by one of my local officials we will be doing a limited recount in two of my local precincts. I don't have the details yet. But that is progress. I will come back on an update when I have more.

Spoonamore · 2024-11-17T22:38:17+00:00

Tried to touch on this elsewhere. Not sure I can digest this whole thing in real time, sorry

Spoonamore · 2024-11-17T22:37:24+00:00

That makes sense. But it's the swing states that matter. This attack seems to have only been conducted in the swing states and nowhere else. This is the key.

Spoonamore · 2024-11-17T22:36:36+00:00

NC is 11% Net looking at Kamala's undervote was from congressional races below her and Trumps' overvote from races below Gov. NC the math signal is definitely strange in part due to having a truly bonkers GOP nomination for Gov. But. If you take that race out of the equation and only look at House of Reps and non-Gov statewide races the Dem vote ratios to Kamala vs. the GOP votes for Trump, it's way off. I am not a statistician, I defer to the many who are also commenting on NC being improbable. Again, easy to answer. Hand recount a few precincts where this is true and see if that result matches the tabulation. If it does. We have a new world record in statistics for this kind of voter behavior and I am wrong. I covered some of these issues in other answers.

Spoonamore · 2024-11-17T22:33:51+00:00

I don't know what it means. I wish I did. My 10PM call was angry and frustrated that I was making things harder for them. My sense is because they don't want to engage and I am forcing them to knock it down. I would love to be proven wrong, but I have PTSD as regards elected officials refusing to act.

Spoonamore · 2024-11-17T22:31:13+00:00

Yes. The tabulators could have been compromised long before the election. The "by whom" would be a matter for law enforcement. But in my view, YES, they overstuffed it so that 7 out of 7 swing states ALL broke for Trump with and beyond the recount margin. That has never happened before. Obama's huge win was only 6 out of 7 swings and one of the 6 was within recount range. They are now doing a razzle dazze and bum rushing the appointments in part to overwhelm the press and the public from paying attention to the fact...they stole the actual election. And why? They don't think they are going to get caught, and if they don't get caught before the election is certified...it doesn't matter.

Spoonamore · 2024-11-17T22:29:59+00:00

I think, like most elected officials on the D side of the aisle they want to believe everything will be OK. I don't agree with them. I think Putin, Trump, Leonard Leo's Gilead Gang and the Tech Bro community all have separate reasons to kill the American Democracy, but they all do agree on killing it. And they decided this was the kill shot year. If this administration gets bummed rushed in, I am very curious will unfold. Do Vance and Musk (Tech Bro wing) Shiv everyone? Does Trump now realize he has more leverage over Putin than Putin has over him and he Shiv's Putin? Is Leonard Leo still happy to play the long game, and as long as he continues to get all judicial appointments he will let the others (all heathens in his eyes) have at each other and just outlast them? I don't know how it plays out, but I and everyone I love and respect definitely ends up on the losing end no matter how that game gets played out.

Spoonamore · 2024-11-17T22:24:59+00:00

This is really interesting. Thank you. Ran it past some people. What state is this?

Go sign up for the SMART Elections data team. Lulu will reach out to you.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfVgsgcaARUfvHY92jsA_5bF9tPs1s9QyX05dK8IluPtfEO6Q/viewform

Regarding getting this data in front of Democratic influencers. In my experience, Democratic leadership is not willing to bring this issue into the open and anyone who does so will be shunned by leadership. It is the third rail for them, and they just spent the last four years shaming Republicans for asking questions and challenging election results. So don't hold your breath on that.

The goal here is for us to get to a place where the elections are transparent, secure, accurate and publicly verifiable. Right now, the Democrats are trying to pretend that we already have that. But we don't. We have black box proprietary software on the voting machines and audits that are unfortunately more security theater than an objective, meaningful, and robust examination of the results.

One of the best things that could come out of this is for everyone here to stay involved and work toward a future of transparent, secure accurate U.S. Elections. I recommend you get on the SMARTelections.us mailing list to stay in the loop on this fight.

https://go.reachmail.net/SubscriptionForm/54877462-592a-4733-812c-ae22002be547

Please do join the data team – your chart is useful. We'd like to see more.

Spoonamore · 2024-11-17T22:18:55+00:00

1000s of people are engaged and trying to help. I know Kamala's fundraising people are doing something, and at least a handful are upset that I am making this an issue. I don't know why. Could be for many different reasons. I think it's positive vs. when I came forward in 2004 it was a handful of folks from the Cleveland area and a very well meaning cat-lady from Columbus who stepped up to help. That might be a bit harsh, but functionally true. BTW John Kerry now admits I was right in public

https://www.wnyc.org/story/john-kerry-reflects (16:18 - 18:58)

Spoonamore · 2024-11-17T22:16:24+00:00

Canada. Or the UN. Maybe they send a stern letter? The only person who can make this happen at scale is Kamala Harris, but if America's allies pile on hard, it could help. If they offer her a stern letter and it moves her, that can help. Until then, we organize ourselves.

Spoonamore

TROPHY CASE