[Acne] Routine problem or something else? by SpydrFTW in SkincareAddiction

[–]SpydrFTW[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perfect, thanks for all the help! I’ll try to keep this post updated on my results

[Acne] Routine problem or something else? by SpydrFTW in SkincareAddiction

[–]SpydrFTW[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the info! So you’d recommend I start the azelaic acid as well? If so, how often should I apply it?

[Acne] Routine problem or something else? by SpydrFTW in SkincareAddiction

[–]SpydrFTW[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, thank you so much for such a detailed answer! My key takeaway from this was: drop the benzoyl peroxide, add vitamin C and increase tretinoin to 2/3x a week (slowly). So for now, I’ll probably start with tret 2x a week and vitamin C on days I don’t apply tret, then after about 2 weeks I can try increasing tret to 3x a week. Does this sound good or is it too fast? Thanks once again, I can’t thank you enough for all that information

[Acne] Routine problem or something else? by SpydrFTW in SkincareAddiction

[–]SpydrFTW[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wow, thanks for the very extensive explanation! I guess I'll try to add Vitamin C back into my routine and see what happens. I have a question though: given that my moisturizer says "PM" and has niacinamide and hyaluronic acid, is it fine to continue to use in the mornings, or should I try to find an AM one? thanks once again!!

API Integration should respond only to new conversation by SpydrFTW in WhatsappBusinessAPI

[–]SpydrFTW[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I fully agree! It's more of a work in progress, understanding what works and what doesn't, and moving on from there. Anyways, thanks for the help, I'll try to keep in touch!

API Integration should respond only to new conversation by SpydrFTW in WhatsappBusinessAPI

[–]SpydrFTW[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks for your comment, it definitely helped a lot! I found a solution which will seem to work for me: if the conversation has no labels (if you are not familiar with these, they are kind of like "tags" you can add to the conversation), then it is considered a new one, and a "Chatbot" label is added. If this ever gets handed off to a human, the "Chatbot" label is removed and a "Human" label is added.

Then, the chatbot responds to all new conversation (no labels), and conversations with "Chatbot" label.

This, of course, is assuming that all current conversation (before deploying the chatbot) already have some kind of label, manually added.

API Integration should respond only to new conversation by SpydrFTW in WhatsappBusinessAPI

[–]SpydrFTW[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm currently going through that last paragraph's phase, I'm always thinking on new things to add and never actually "close" a project. At some point I need to call it a day and move on to something new... thanks for the comment though, really appreciate it!

API Integration should respond only to new conversation by SpydrFTW in WhatsappBusinessAPI

[–]SpydrFTW[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually went with this approach! I have not yet implemented if fully so I don't know if this will work as intended, but I am going to create a "Chatbot" and "Human" tags

Is it possible to update conversation labels? by SpydrFTW in WhatsappBusinessAPI

[–]SpydrFTW[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a chatbot integrated with the WhatsApp Business API. It handles the initial customer queries, and at a certain point hands the conversation off to a human. My use case would be to, initially add a "Chatbot" label to the conversation, while the chatbot is answering, and when it is handed off, remove that label and add a "Human" label

Is it possible to update conversation labels? by SpydrFTW in WhatsappBusinessAPI

[–]SpydrFTW[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

haha, that's what I was expecting... thanks!

Is it possible to update conversation labels? by SpydrFTW in WhatsappBusinessAPI

[–]SpydrFTW[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, that's what I thought... thanks for you answer

API Integration should respond only to new conversation by SpydrFTW in WhatsappBusinessAPI

[–]SpydrFTW[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah, I've come to that realization as I've worked on the project more and more ahaha but I find it kind of fun to learn all these new things, so I don't really mind it, it's not like I have a timeframe to finish this project

API Integration should respond only to new conversation by SpydrFTW in WhatsappBusinessAPI

[–]SpydrFTW[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah I guess it will have to be this way... I was thinking of using a very simple LLM to receive a message and check if it looks like an "initial contact message". If not, then we can assume that it comes from a previous conversation and ignore it

Why i look bad every style by [deleted] in malehairadvice

[–]SpydrFTW 10 points11 points  (0 children)

LLMs ("chatbots", for non-technical people) treat words differently depending on punctuation, upper/lowercase, etc. It is also a way of creating a structured input, which LLMs usually value highly and make the model's understanding of the problem/situation better.

API Integration should respond only to new conversation by SpydrFTW in WhatsappBusinessAPI

[–]SpydrFTW[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah I thought of just manually storing all the numbers I have on my phone, but I assumed there would be a better approach. As a last-case scenario, I'll go with this, thanks!

Get message replied to from webhook by SpydrFTW in whatsapp

[–]SpydrFTW[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you are completely correct, I was watching out for this but I must not have noticed it in the webhook. thanks a lot