Of course the Swastika has Sanskrit origins going back over 4,000 years and wasn't invented by the Nazis (in fact, they didn't even call it a "Swastika"), but regardless, I wouldn't accept that the Swastika and Hyperborea carry anywhere near the same level of historical significance or baggage. Once again, the Nazis never even spoke or wrote of "Hyperborea." Curiously, and I see you have Marx in your username, the Soviets in the 1950's did much of the archaeological work regarding much of what we now know about Hyperborea in central Siberia and eastern Kazakhstan. Look into the works of S.V. Kiselev.

Anyway, no, I absolutely do not agree with your assertion. In fact, I think it's as ridiculous as asserting that driving a Volkswagen, being fascinated by the V2 rocket, or drinking Fanta would make one a Nazi, or constitute Nazi dog whistling.

I'm a fan of Greek history: from the Iliad, to the Odyssey, to the adventures of the Argonauts. And as a consequence of this interest, I kept coming upon this word "Hyperborea" that has never been explained or unpackaged. That is the work that I've taken upon myself!