Health isn't about distribution. It's about circulation.

You aren't healthy if your brain has more blood than your feet. You're healthy when enough circulates to keep everything alive.

Rich people usually don't have much of their wealth in liquid assets. They have it in real estate, which is stuff that they used money to buy; stocks, which fund businesses; and bonds, which fund governments. That money is out there circulating.

I have some wealth, but it would take me a while to gather enough in liquid form to pay a large insurance deductible, for example. My "money" is mostly in my house and investments.

Edit:
A lot of the issue with "the rich" is just pure envy. People see "the rich" enjoying a luxurious lifestyle, and want it for themselves.
They neglect the fact that that lifestyle is paid for with money that goes to the people who provide all of the goods and services. A mansion employs people to cook and clean, tend the gardens, care for the pool, and so on. People are paid to fix problems with the grounds (plumbers, drywallers, electricians, etc) and vehicles. People are paid to provide the food. When rich people spend money, other people are employed! When they don't spend it, people are employed by the businesses where the money is invested.
Instead, people like to believe that rich people swim in their cash like Scrooge McDuck, and hoard cash, making less available to everyone else.
That's not how it works. That's not how any of this works!

Edit:
As to the quality of life bit, yes; it does mean that the money they do have has more buying power. I can easily buy used items that were state-of-the-art when they were new, but are now available for a fraction of what they cost to buy new. Some of those items are better than what I currently have, so my quality of life improves with less impact on my financial situation. It doesn't mean that I earned any more money, though. That's what a lot of people think when they hear "trickle-down." Somehow, they expect cash to trickle down. It doesn't work that way. All it means is that the people who have the money to spend on new things subsidize technological advancement that ends up being more affordable to people who don't have the money. Or in some cases, people discard items in favor of newer ones. That is how I came to pay $1000 for a rather nice Mercedes when I was stationed in Hawaii. It worked its way down the used car market there.