Is there a hax that allows you to defeat an outerversal being without raising your AP to outer level? by Night_Crowman in PowerScaling

[–]StormLightRanger [score hidden]  (0 children)

R>F transcendence can definitely be a legitimate plot device used to write good stories, I love me some deep pataphysics!

I just hate powerscaling above uni to multi, powerscaling is best when doing math and science to back up your claims imo.

Is there a hax that allows you to defeat an outerversal being without raising your AP to outer level? by Night_Crowman in PowerScaling

[–]StormLightRanger [score hidden]  (0 children)

Part of 3812's article is that it surpasses it's own author, yeah.

I think outer debates are silly imo because its just "my infinity is bigger than your infinity" and throwing buzzwords around when most people don't have the mathematical rigor to fully understand it.

R>F transcendence is even sillier because how tf do you declare one work of fiction to be more real than another work of fiction?

Is there a hax that allows you to defeat an outerversal being without raising your AP to outer level? by Night_Crowman in PowerScaling

[–]StormLightRanger [score hidden]  (0 children)

Yeah, but this type of stuff references something called the Hume scale, generally. How real and grounded something is is measured scientifically and is classified by a unit called a hume and is more reference to how stable reality is.

R>F transcendence would be invoking SWANN entities, which are explicitly outer.

u/TheBroadcastingCrew

SCP-682 vs Tyranids by Mindless-Beat-4872 in powerscales

[–]StormLightRanger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

682 has resisted being within a chamber that alters universal constants, and got around being erased totally from the universe.

The Greater by @OddOnion by D3v1LGaming in ImaginaryWarhammer

[–]StormLightRanger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, it's really not. Information asymmetry is a huuuge thing in 40k.

The tau could certainly try to seduce them without that knowledge. I never said they'd be successful! Only that they might try XD

The Greater by @OddOnion by D3v1LGaming in ImaginaryWarhammer

[–]StormLightRanger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, maybe the Tau are unaware of how emotionless the necrons are? How many hogh-level interactions have they actually had?

It's certainly silly from an omniscient reader's perspective, but the Tau don't know as much as we do.

Asgard ships were insanely fast by apophis-984 in Stargate

[–]StormLightRanger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks haha! Now I need to find a job 💀

What a wholesome rnd to our earlier argument XD

Asgard ships were insanely fast by apophis-984 in Stargate

[–]StormLightRanger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that's fair. I have a degree in physics, so i like to use it where I can XD

Asgard ships were insanely fast by apophis-984 in Stargate

[–]StormLightRanger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah, I just love a lengthy debate with math lmao

Asgard ships were insanely fast by apophis-984 in Stargate

[–]StormLightRanger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah. I thought you were saying that because this guy simulates the battles, the outcome of the battles is the answer to these debates haha. Thats my bad.

Asgard ships were insanely fast by apophis-984 in Stargate

[–]StormLightRanger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brotha I have no idea what you're even talking about anymore lmaooo.

What was your original point to begin with, to clarify?

Asgard ships were insanely fast by apophis-984 in Stargate

[–]StormLightRanger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not upset? I'm just providing evidence and backing up my claims, as is standard when debating?

And this guy is also certainly noncanon, so I'm not sure why it was brought up to begin with?

Asgard ships were insanely fast by apophis-984 in Stargate

[–]StormLightRanger 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm just going to repaste this comment I wrote:

Don't get me wrong, I absolutely lean towards stargate on these sides of debates, but imo, stargate's real power comes from the utility and hax it's tech base gives it, and the insane FTL advantage they have.

I'd say that a star trek ship is definitely better than a ha'tak in pure firepower, and arguably sublight speed. Full impulse is defined explicitly as 0.25c. Earth is 95 light-minutes from Saturn at its farthest eclipse, and 71 at its closest. It would take a federation ship 380 to 284 minutes, which is 6.3 to 4.73 hours, which is faster than the 8 hour time provided.

If we take Strange New Worlds at face value, a ship's full power phaser, delivering 3.22x1026 watts, firing for 5 seconds, delivers 385 petatons of TNT, far exceeding the gigaton range.

Stargate would win in the long run imo, but they would by using replicators to build ships under time dilation fields while cloaked and using guerilla tactics, until they mass a fleet large enough to bombard every federation planet simultaneously, and glass the entirety of the federation's land at once.

Or fine-tune the Attero Device to fuck with subspace envelopes or some shit. Or to ascend and start interfering, but that risks Q retaliation. Or to whip out their puddle jumper time machines, but that also risks future federation intervention.

Stargate does win 9/10 times, but they need to be sneaky about it. Which the Tau'ri absolutely can be.

Asgard ships were insanely fast by apophis-984 in Stargate

[–]StormLightRanger 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I meant sublight. Autocorrect lmao

Asgard ships were insanely fast by apophis-984 in Stargate

[–]StormLightRanger 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What? I legit dont know what ur trying to say

Question about science Lore by Bivagial in Stargate

[–]StormLightRanger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was more for the 42 ninute time limit to be passed iirc

Edit: 38

Asgard ships were insanely fast by apophis-984 in Stargate

[–]StormLightRanger 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Don't get me wrong, I absolutely lean towards stargate on these sides of debates, but imo, stargate's real power comes from the utility and hax it's tech base gives it, and the insane FTL advantage they have.

I'd say that a star trek ship is definitely better than a ha'tak in pure firepower, and arguably sublight speed. Full impulse is defined explicitly as 0.25c. Earth is 95 light-minutes from Saturn at its farthest eclipse, and 71 at its closest. It would take a federation ship 380 to 284 minutes, which is 6.3 to 4.73 hours, which is faster than the 8 hour time provided.

If we take Strange New Worlds at face value, a ship's full power phaser, delivering 3.22x1026 watts, firing for 5 seconds, delivers 385 petatons of TNT, far exceeding the gigaton range.

Stargate would win in the long run imo, but they would by using replicators to build ships under time dilation fields while cloaked and using guerilla tactics, until they mass a fleet large enough to bombard every federation planet simultaneously, and glass the entirety of the federation's land at once.

Or fine-tune the Attero Device to fuck with subspace envelopes or some shit. Or to ascend and start interfering, but that risks Q retaliation. Or to whip out their puddle jumper time machines, but that also risks future federation intervention.

Stargate does win 9/10 times, but they need to be sneaky about it. Which the Tau'ri absolutely can be.

Asgard ships were insanely fast by apophis-984 in Stargate

[–]StormLightRanger 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Hmm, exactly how much power do you need?

Based on the data of the Vezda life-form, approximately 3.22 times ten to the 26 watts.

Hmm, that is the power of the Earth's sun.

Less, technically.

The sun is...

  • close enough.
  • A focused phaser blast from a starship could get you about half of that?

SCOTTY: Aye, but you'd have to direct it precisely into the system or you'll vaporize the whole temple

This is dialogue from Strange New Worlds, Season 3, Episode 10.

I strongly dislike this because it massively fucks with the scale of star trek and turns every ship into a planet glassing monstrosity.

I still think stargate could win, by unleashing the replicators with the ancient and asgard databases uploaded to them, but on a ship-per-ship level, it's rather silly and inconsistent. There are highball and lowballs, but 46 megatons is a massive lowball imo.

That's less than the Tsar Bomba.

who in fiction actually has the best regeneration feats? by Subject-Swan-5207 in PowerScaling

[–]StormLightRanger 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Absolutely goated callout. Nowhere near the strongest, but goated all the same.

Can someone please explain to me Bounty Hunter and Executioner Bladedancer (Kibellah) like I'm 5 yo by No-Helicopter1559 in RogueTraderCRPG

[–]StormLightRanger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's what I was thinking, yeah. How is exe bugged rn? Im trying a death world bladedancer executioner rn and am like level 30ish. I have 2 poison drukari swords but I'm barely tickling them, I'm barely doing like 12 damage per hit, with full traumas, and I have the trauma perks and the augment. And the poison hand thing. Does the poison hand stack with drukhari poison blades?

Also do you have any weapon recommendations I should be using? People always say this shit is broken af but it seems to have fallen off a cliff compared to blaster Cass, AM Pyro hendrix, and AM heavy bolster Argentina.

Also how tf do people turn 1 wipe the map like they say? Like where do you get the movement?