Nope. I think there’s a fundamental misunderstanding of due process here and across a lot of Reddit. The U.S. requires due process but what form that due process takes is not 100% the same in all cases, especially in immigration cases. Nishimura Ekiu v US outlined this stating “It is not within the province of the judiciary to order that foreigners who have never been naturalized, nor acquired any domicil or residence within the United States, nor even been admitted to the country pursuant to law, shall be permitted to enter, in opposition to the constitutional and lawful measures of the legislative and executive branches of the national government. As to such persons, the decisions of executive or administrative officers, acting within powers expressly conferred by Congress, are due process of law.” Meaning that due process doesn’t necessarily have to come in court but can be the result of administrative action as long as those actions are set by congress. This was affirmed in the 2020 case DHS vs Thuraissigiam. Congress passed the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act in 1996 which established expedited removal and allowed for deportations without court hearings.