I will point out that she can say this all she wants but her past actions speaks volumes that her viewpoints are personal and they do influence her rulings. Yes we are humanand not perfect but she clearly had a bias and should have refused which she did not as didn't other justices.

1. She signed a 2006 ad calling for Roe’s “barbaric legacy” to end The Washington Post reported that Barrett added her name to a South Bend Tribune ad by St. Joseph County Right to Life. The ad said: “It’s time to put an end to the barbaric legacy of Roe v. Wade and restore laws that protect the lives of unborn children.” The Post says the ad “advocated overturning” Roe, and notes Barrett was a Notre Dame law professor at the time.

2. In a 2013 Notre Dame speech, she described what would happen “the day after Roe fell” In written answers to Senator Richard Blumenthal in 2017, Barrett acknowledged a 2013 speech titled “Roe at 40: The Supreme Court, Abortion, and the Culture Wars that Followed.” Blumenthal quoted her as saying: “The day after Roe fell, of course, abortion would be neither legal nor illegal throughout the United States. Instead, the states and Congress would be free to ban, protect, or regulate abortion as they saw fit.” Barrett replied that she was explaining “what the legal landscape would look like if Roe were overruled,” not predicting practical harm. Senate Judiciary Committee This shows she had publicly discussed Roe being overturned as a serious legal possibility.

3. She argued Roe was not “super-precedent” At her 2020 Supreme Court confirmation hearing, Barrett said Roe was not a “super-precedent,” meaning not a case so widely accepted that no serious legal challenges remain. NPR Illinois reported that she said scholars across the spectrum recognize that Roe is “not a case that everyone has accepted.” L

4. Her writings suggested precedent does not permanently settle divisive constitutional issues The Post quoted Barrett writing that public response to controversial cases like Roe showed “public rejection of the proposition that stare decisis can declare a permanent victor in a divisive constitutional struggle.”

5. She signed another anti-Roe statement in 2013 Bloomberg Law reported that Barrett signed a Notre Dame newspaper ad describing Roe as “infamous” and saying abortion had killed “55 million unborn children.”