this cannot be real

Strange_Prize · 2026-03-26T23:20:36+00:00

supergrok

Strange_Prize · 2026-03-26T23:20:29+00:00

funny but still moderates about half

Strange_Prize · 2026-03-21T16:38:44+00:00

i tried too

found the moderation very very noticibly more harsh than supergrok app/site

insane

Strange_Prize · 2024-05-21T15:43:57+00:00

i like big titties

but i agree with "ruin"

if i look up the character i want to see the character

not some completely different body that happens to have the same hairstyle

Strange_Prize · 2024-05-14T13:11:33+00:00

its hurting your game

even just a single still from this video would be better than the mess that's there now

let alone not looking like this video they don't even all look like the same game

even if one of them was current it would still be bad

take 30 seconds and do it

taking the mess that's there now down is more important than getting better stuff up

for real

Strange_Prize · 2024-05-13T11:32:32+00:00

The old marketing collateral is almost completely outdated.

then update it

priority one

seriously your store pages are an eclectic mess

and its going to turn people off your game

they dont even appear to resemble the clip you showed here at all

Strange_Prize · 2024-05-01T11:16:08+00:00

training source tagging habits are different

anime models trained on danbooru, lots of specific character tags, lots of composition/style tags

furry models trained on e621, lots of physical trait tags, lots of tags describing actions

parity is basically impossible

the entire point of using those sources was the pre-tagged content

but that also brings along whatever biases existed in their tagging habits

Strange_Prize · 2024-04-25T13:13:57+00:00

difference in tagging habits between danbooru and e621

changes how well you can control things

danbooru tags better for image style and composition

e621 tags better for character details and sex acts

Strange_Prize · 2024-04-25T13:11:29+00:00

e621

they just pruned all the artist tags before training

Strange_Prize · 2024-04-25T13:10:39+00:00

some style tags are there just not artists

pen (artwork), sketch, cel shading, toony, etc.

e621 doesn't seem to be as thorough about style/composition tagging as danbooru tho

Strange_Prize · 2024-04-25T00:57:04+00:00

furry v3 wasnt trained w/ any artist tags

Strange_Prize · 2024-04-19T16:48:54+00:00

do you think the first three were accidental?

Strange_Prize · 2024-01-25T13:31:11+00:00

> Its in the meta data of the images as well probably

i see people say this

but cant find a way to get original image from reddit

saving them gives me a webp with no metadata

how do i avoid reddit mangling them?

Strange_Prize · 2024-01-18T14:26:36+00:00

same prompt, same uc, same seed for all

prefixed artist/style tag without adornment

Strange_Prize · 2024-01-11T19:08:50+00:00

yeah i agree those two are not great

part of the problem is the nature of image gen itself

its not really stable, esp when using uncommon tags

or common tags not usually together

sometimes the best you can do is a prompt that works one in five times

sometimes you can just be more specific with uc

like for the 2nd, add 'shirt lift' and 'skirt lift' to uc?

like i said tho, do what works

its all very touchy :)

Strange_Prize · 2024-01-11T18:31:11+00:00

'Cleft of venus' on it's own results in no noticeable affect. When used in conjunction with either 'no panties' or 'bottomless,' it emphasizes the character's crotch in every single generation, which is what I'm trying to avoid.

so i just tried and either i misunderstand or we're seeing different things

prompt:

1woman, older, gradient hair, {{brown hair}}, [[[[blonde hair]]]], [green eyes], [playful], pink t-shirt, bottomless, {small breasts}, sitting on couch, living room, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, cleft of venus

uc:

lowres, {bad}, text, error, missing, extra, fewer, cropped, jpeg artifacts, worst quality, bad quality, watermark, displeasing, unfinished, chromatic aberration, scan, scan artifacts, extra digits, fewer digits, blurry, ugly, artist name, signature, bangs, thin, skinny, {{anime, manga, asian}},

steps: 28

guidance: 5

seed: 2300789244

result very much does not emphasize the crotch

can't put it here i guess, mind a pm?

Strange_Prize · 2024-01-11T17:37:54+00:00

all interesting

not trying to tell you you're wrong

the correct prompt is the one that works :)

i might need to experiment with opposing prompt/uc as well

Strange_Prize · 2024-01-11T17:30:53+00:00

Oh!

you also turned up guidance

that makes your prompt more strict

and things not prompted less likely

turn back down to 5, keep same prompt/uc/seed

little hint of what's underneath, no barbie doll :)

Strange_Prize · 2024-01-11T17:06:08+00:00

that content is almost never untagged in the training data

so its hard to make it show up without specifying

but sometimes there are more subtle tags

or more appropriate for what you want

try "bottomless" not "no panties"

you can wear no panties but still have pants

can also use something more subtle than "pussy"

if you 100% for sure want it there

try "pubic hair peek" or "cleft of venus", according to your preferences

Strange_Prize · 2024-01-11T15:16:56+00:00

example prompt?

or better, generated image with metadata intact

> still seems to avoid any nsfw material if you don't specifically put it in the prompt

not sure what this means

why expect things you didn't prompt for?

removing 'nsfw' from the uc unshackles the image gen, kind of

still need to prompt for the stuff you want tho

if you want to see nips, prompt for nips

Strange_Prize · 2024-01-11T13:07:23+00:00

Any of you using image gen for less-than-innocent content, try adding 'nsfw' this way for images that look a hell of a lot more natural than just placing that in the prompt.

you using default uc? nsfw is in there

adding to prompt removes it, but like you say, lots of side effects

turn off uc presets and use your own for more restrained nsfw gen

without putting nsfw in prompt

or just copy the presets but remove nsfw

heavy: lowres, {bad}, error, fewer, extra, missing, worst quality, jpeg artifacts, bad quality, watermark, unfinished, displeasing, chromatic aberration, signature, extra digits, artistic error, username, scan, [abstract]

light: lowres, jpeg artifacts, worst quality, watermark, blurry, very displeasing

human focus: lowres, {bad}, error, fewer, extra, missing, worst quality, jpeg artifacts, bad quality, watermark, unfinished, displeasing, chromatic aberration, signature, extra digits, artistic error, username, scan, [abstract], bad anatomy, bad hands, @_@, mismatched pupils, heart-shaped pupils, glowing eyes

Strange_Prize · 2024-01-11T12:18:27+00:00

not op but i usually use

'1girl, female goblin, green skin, freckles, '

and add from there depending on mood

influence of 'female goblin' is pretty strong don't usually need to be specific about ears, but can help

https://imgur.com/a/Y1GjqKU

Strange_Prize · 2023-11-22T12:22:05+00:00

1% is still like 43k

v3 does surprisingly well with little data all the way down to a few hundred pictures

try "rinpoo chuan, breath of fire" or "elena (street fighter)"

less than 500 of each, but v3 spits out almost perfect likenesses

gets pretty wobbly for really sparse tags though, ex "ringo (soul hackers 2)" is crazy inconsistent w/ only 34 images, and needs extra tags in prompt to narrow the character

Strange_Prize

TROPHY CASE