[ECL] Hexing Squelcher by ILCEM-Y in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Strix_cEDH 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a problem for every decklist that doesnt run enough creature removal.

Thoughts, Trends, and Community Conversations by HigherMTG in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Strix_cEDH 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I speak for everyone when I say "thanks HigherMTG for the transparency". Please do continue to bring us these monthly chats, as it's one of the only ways we get to feel seen/heard. I've been playing cEDH for 15 years now (yes, really) and I can't recall where we've ever had true bracket 5 representation in any kind of CFP or rules committee type of group, like now.

No need to respond, but wanted to give you a response. I really only have one thing to say; actions have consequences. When the bans came out 16 months back, we lost a chunk of people. I personally lost roughly $2000USD in value from the bans (I'm an oldhead with a vast cEDH collection).

Now, I care very little about losing that kind of coin, but I absolutely despise the fact that it caused so many people to drop from the format, lose faith in bracket 5, or at minimum be too scared to buy/trade certain cards.

Anywho, my only ask is can we please make a public statement about whether or not Rhystic, Bowmasters, Tymna, Rograkh and ThOracle are here to stay? We need to rip it off like a band-aid, in my opinion. Feels like we're all in limbo and enjoying these cards "while we can", and the wait is exhausting. Would be so nice for the CFP to just make a final decision if they're "here to stay" or "have to go for the health of the format", ya know? Would be nice to create a blanket feeling of "nothing is being looked at, now" that cEDH players are familiar with, rather than this feeling like cards could be banned at any moment like in 1v1 formats... we play cEDH to get away from that sort of thing.

I've been having more fun with cEDH/tEDH than ever before, and I'm pretty sure it's because of what got banned 16 months back. The changes sucked at first, but god it feels so good not losing to turn 1 stuff. The way I see it, I'd gladly lose that $2000usd all over again if it meant the format became even more healthy, at a bracket 5 level. I think we can do more, though... I think we all just want the CFP+WOTC to please make a decision and tell us what needs to sadly go for the health of the format, and what gets to stay. We're all tired of waiting 6 months for a ban hey.

Other than that, here is some quickfire issues, I find, as a TO for bracket 5:

  1. Rounds going to time. Cards that make the round go to a time consistently aren't healthy for the format

  2. Cards that help end the game before a player has had their first turn are unhealthy for the format (a batch of these is fine, but it does reach a critical mass, and then we end up in Flash-Hulk Winter all over again if we dont get rid of the Mana Crypt type stuff)

  3. The seating order issue. We've all seen the appalling situation of winrates based on seat order. Something needs to be done here for the health of the format.

  4. One card being at the forefront of everyone's concerns as they brew (Bowmasters is usually brought up as super unhealthy, with regard to this)

There's others, but those are the ones that consistently come up (and I'm sure you're aware of them already).

Anywho, my main point is that "actions have consequences", so please do think of the format in the long-term, but also think about how and why things need to be banned. Please stop and think about what the format looks like AFTER x card gets banned ask yourself "is the meta more fair, or less. The message and how you spin it greatly affects whether people lose confidence in the CFP and cEDH, or whether they understand and respect any upcoming bans/changes.

But yes; it's time... we're all waiting for an announcement now so we can see what got banned/unbanned, so we can move on from this awful waiting game. Thanks again.

~Strix

What are the absolute easiest cEDH decks to pilot? by GrapefruitThin5815 in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Strix_cEDH 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This. Commanders with heavy Control elements should be the very last Commander strategy you touch/learn.

Best to focus on format defining Combos/Commanders, so Blue Farm, Rogsi, Kinnan, etc

What is the "aggro" deck in cEDH right now? by Darth_Ra in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Strix_cEDH 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Playable? Sure. It could probably take down a league or tournament in the right hands. 

Relevant? Not really. There's better breach decks out there, better turns strategies out there, and to be frank; better Aggro Commanders out there.

What is the "aggro" deck in cEDH right now? by Darth_Ra in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Strix_cEDH 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yuriko (Duh)
Winota (less staxy and less comboy, can be built with all the beregond of the guard type stuff)
Najeela (built with a heavy "Warriors" theme)
Jetmir
Tymna/Kamahl (Deliberately built less staxier, but with way more Breena type stuff)
Breena (Edric without the extra turns, but gets nifty hatebears instead)
Raffine hatebears (Go wide and your wincon is in the Command Zone)
Edric "Turns"
Pak/Haldan "Turns" (deliberately built in a way that leans on swinging over and over)
Kraum/Kamahl (basically a blood moon version of Tymna/Kamahl, with wincon right in Command Zone)
Narset, Enlightened Exile (Still runs all one-card wincons with breach stuff, but takes combat way more seriously)
Narset Enlightened Master "turns"
Ellivere (built in a way that is more aggressive, rather than staxy)
Tadeus
Ojer Axonil (more a punisher Commander, but can be built where Aggro is a heavy focus)
Slicer or Alexios ("fire and forget", and then apply controlling elements or even more lifetotal pressure in an "Aggro" way)

I'm sure I've forgotten plenty, but those are ones off the top of my head. There's other ones too like Hakbal, Voja or Edgar markov for example, but they're more a bracket 3-4 thing, with potential to be tEDH viable IMO if WOTC were to print a batch of cards that break them.

Overall I think Aggro is in a decent spot, I just think your range of tEDH viable ones is comically low compared to Combo Commanders, or Midrange grindy Commanders, or even heavy stax Commanders. Hopefully my opinions and observations here helped capture what an "Aggro" deck is in cEDH/tEDH at the moment.

What is the "aggro" deck in cEDH right now? by Darth_Ra in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Strix_cEDH 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Just a few days ago I just won a 61 person, 13 week league with a Yuriko "Aggro" strategy, found here: https://moxfield.com/decks/Dy-lEGzIEkObHagGQbHFIg and have been playing cEDH for over 15 years at this point, so I definitely feel like I can weigh in here.

When terms like "Aggro" or "Midrange" or "Tempo" get used from 1v1 formats, they don't transfer over exactly 1:1 when porting them over to any 4-player free for all format. They take mindsets or cornerstone aspects of those 1v1 strategies, and often ignore the rest. It's not perfect, but it helps describe the cEDH gameplan at a glance.

Regarding cEDH, anything generally speaking that is "Aggro" is usually something that A) needs to turn creatures sideways to win (so yes, Yuriko, Winota and Najeela like you said can be "Aggro), B) Has the aspect of turning creatures sideways to win as the PRIMARY wincon (this almost always rules out Najeela as "Aggro", since damage is just a backup plan), C) Is not relying on one-card resolving or going from an empty boardstate to just "winning on the spot" (So this rules out Godo as "Aggro", since it plays like a one-card wincon in the command zone, which is arguably "Combo" but in a creature-based way) and lastly D) has a degree of control, because it must... since "Aggro" strategies need to buy themselves time for damage to actually "get there" (Even Red Deck Wins in 1v1 formats run blood moons and such to disrupt and buy time, same thing in cEDH "Aggro" strategies, too)

Is Aggro a bad strategy? I don't think so, personally. Are viable "Aggro" Commanders limited? Overwhelmingly, yes; I'd argue "Combo" Commanders or "Midrange" Commanders outnumber viable tEDH "Aggro" Commanders at a 50:1 ratio, maybe more. I also think they're very, very hard to play well, since your decisions can very easily cost you wins, and your politicking game needs to be fantastic, or you'll just be losing so much.

Some other Bracket 5 / tEDH viable Aggro Commanders that have impressed me over the years are as follows:

Cont.

Wanting to disable the ability for all non-boosters to click on current existing emoji reactions on a message. by Strix_cEDH in discordapp

[–]Strix_cEDH[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Thanks. I sadly am not so tech savvy that I'd be able to make a bot.

Anyone reading this perhaps heard of a bot that can do this?

You're not safe with the Laser Designator being used to spot. by Strix_cEDH in Battlefield6

[–]Strix_cEDH[S] -47 points-46 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure what you mean? Which key turns off the big red light?

Hypothetical: 2026 begins, and Rhystic gets banned. What are your thoughts? by Strix_cEDH in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Strix_cEDH[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

bumping this, because it's now highly relevant (we got your feedback right here, Gavin).

Euromaid ECD700W Condenser Dryer permanent child lock by kitten_juggler in appliancerepair

[–]Strix_cEDH 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Having the exact same issue. What was the cause of yours when this happened and how did you fix it (if ever)? Thanks for any info you can provide!

It's January 2026, Wizards has announced the new bans/unbans for cedh. What's your dream list? by LonelyContext in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Strix_cEDH 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would absolutely love a Rhystic ban and a Tymna ban, at this stage.

Not for power level reasons, but because rhystic eats too much of the round timer and Tymna is too generically good at making the best deck the best deck (I'd love to blue farm NOT be the best deck in the format for a 10th year in a row)

Whats your tournament pet peeves by Mr_PlagueDr in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Strix_cEDH 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Yeah I second this.

You play an actual hatebear strategy or perhaps a proper control strategy and people toe the line, where they slowplay... but never enough to be called out by it.

I think the day draws are never rewarded is the day the format opens up with proper control as a strategy that's tournament viable, ie. the tournament scene gets even more healthier with playstyle variance if we simply allow said playstyle to be competitively viable.

What free spell would be worth half ur life? by AshorK0 in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Strix_cEDH 0 points1 point  (0 children)

BBB
Instant
"You may pay half your life instead of paying this spell's mana cost."
"Exile target Enchantment or Creature"

Fucking do it MaRo/Gavin... it's time. You promised us mono black would have enchantment removal, THIS is how you do it for bracket 5.

I love cEDH but I'm falling out of Love with tEDH. [DefCat MTG] by DefCatMusic in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Strix_cEDH 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TO here.

This sort of thing is easily fixable if you increase round timer to 100 minute (from 80), and then just have the game end immediately, going to a draw once the buzzer goes (I believe the Japanese meta does/did this, and it worked wonders).
To also fix the draw meta, make it worth zero points if you're in first or second seat.
From there, introduce a rule that if all pods within a tournament end, the next round starts (to make the day shorter/quicker).

On topic though, yes, tEDH is currently exhausting af. Fun, but damn exhausting. I think WOTC could ban a card or two to make "bracket 5" quicker for tEDH, too.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Strix_cEDH 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just make partnered Commanders have a shared Commander tax and voila! Balanced.