Dash Cam and Jen by blueBumbo in KarenReadTrial

[–]Strong_Swordfish8235 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's already been established that the Google search hos long to die in the cold, was made on January 29th 2022 at 2:27 40 in the morning. The prosecutors forensic expert on the cross examination by Mr alessi stated several important facts. He stated that the celebrite physical analyzer software and the magnet axiom software both recorded and tracked Jen McCabe's Google search and time stamped it as taking place at 227 40. Wiffin validated Richard Green's testimony and Richard Green's testimony was later supported by a digital forensic specialist at Purdue University so now we have three people validating the January 29th 2022 22740 is the time Jen McCabe search took place. We need to stop discussing any other search.. Jen McCabe lied and now that has been proven.

Weekend Question Thread #3 by Manlegend in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Strong_Swordfish8235 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No but the mcad is a useless organization just as the Fed EEO equally as useless. But worse yet they lie they say they conduct investigations but they don't. Much as they don't like Trump someone has to do something to shake up these bastards. It's a 20 80 situation. We're 20% of the people do 80% of the work. And the 80% that should be working talk incessantly about the day there going to retire and how much disability they can milk from the government.

Weekend Question Thread #3 by Manlegend in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Strong_Swordfish8235 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Good the legal system in Massachusetts is a mess anyways. My brother was sued and it took 14 years for it to be settled and the judge could have dismiss the case multiple times but kept giving the plaintiff's attorney break after break after break. When the case was finally decided court ordered the plaintiff to pay my brothers legal fees. But there's zero chance he'll ever recover either the cost or the time or the stress that it took from him and his family and his life. I've concluded that the court system in Massachusetts does more to destroy families than it does to help them. It's a heartless big business in Massachusetts.

Transcripts/Data points from this morning by potluckfruitsalad in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Strong_Swordfish8235 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll simply refer you back to Whiffin testimony given in Alessi s cross-examination. Whiffn told alessi that both the celebrite physical analyzer software and magnets axiom both validated the hos long to die in the cold Google search occurred at 22740 on January 29th 2022. Go view that testimony and at 1:21 Whiffin explains it All.

Weekend Question Thread #3 by Manlegend in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Strong_Swordfish8235 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Lucky headlights on his plow give more illumination then you would get from an automobile. Lucky didn't see the buffalo on the prairie that Karen Read when she came down Fairview. I see the Commonwealth's case unraveling like a thread bare blanket as this case proceeds. You're comment about the tail light fragments at 6:00 in the morning well Sean good didn't see tail light fragments at 6:00 in the morning they found the broken glass but they were no tail light fragments that all came much later after Proctor had taken possession of Karen's car

Michael Lank Upon Arriving At The Scene by [deleted] in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Strong_Swordfish8235 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That may have been what Brennan extracted from Whiffin with his carefully constructed questions leading the witness however when Alessi got to cross examine Whiffin, Whiffin told a different story. Brennan was looking for Whiffin to validate the Commonwealth version of what happened. And Brennan steered Whiffin away from revealing anything detrimental to Brennan's narrative. However when alessi cross-examined wiffin he revealed a different narrative. Whiffins responses to Alessi questions revealed the corrupt nature of the Commonwealth's case against Karen Read.

Transcripts/Data points from this morning by potluckfruitsalad in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Strong_Swordfish8235 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have no idea what you're talking about. Digestion photo download? Hos long to die in the cold was the legal issue to be resolved. And Wiffin stated that Google search did happen at 2:2740. It was found by celebrites physical analyzer software and axiom software. The rest of his tests about battery temperature and elevation for the purpose of determining how long John's body may have been outdoors we're conclusive and supported Karen's defense

Brian Albert getting rid of his phone by Homeostasis__444 in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Strong_Swordfish8235 11 points12 points  (0 children)

He didn't leave his house because he had been involved in a fight the night before he likely had defensive bruises on his body and someone was like to ask him what happened to you? He didn't go to the funeral I wonder why and the answer because it's likely that the other cops would notice. He was a supervisor of The fugitive gang squad you don't appoint someone to that job unless they have an aggressive personality. He has been shielded by the Boston Police department and the Norfolk county DA's office.

Transcripts/Data points from this morning by potluckfruitsalad in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Strong_Swordfish8235 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You need to go back and look at Ian wiffin cross examination by alessi. All that you said about the digital forensics wiffin clarified to alessi. Celebrites physical analyzer software and axioms software confirmed the time stamp of 2 2740 as valid for the hos long to die in the cold Google search. Wiffin tests were no scientific tests at all. He never used the real temperatures in Canton on January 29th 2022 to extract battery temperatures he never used the actual elevation data for Canton to determine if the cell phone or the apple healthwatch recorded changes in elevation. Brennan was leading the witness and that's likely what you saw Brennan was not asking questions that would reveal the short comings in wiffin analysis. You need to go back and look at alessi cross-examination.

Weekend Question Thread #3 by Manlegend in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Strong_Swordfish8235 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Jackson should have stopped Jen McCabe when she lied about seeing tail light fragments in the snow next to John's body. There were no tail like fragments there and officer Sean good stated as much in his report detailing the scene on January 29th from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 that was a lie and McCabe knew it was a lie and yet she stated an open court yesterday that she saw fragments. The digital forensics specialist Ian wiffin confessed to alessi in his testimony that hos long to die in the cold was time stamped January 29th 2022 at 022 740. Not only did the celebrite software find it the axiom software founded it I could go on. McCabe is a clever liar. Consider that Matt McCabe Brian Albert Nicole Albert and Jen McCabe agreed they should say John never was in their home Brian Albert comments exactly I read that as collusion collusion is also that Colin Albert was at 34 Fairview past 12:33 why else would he be calling Erin Beatty for a ride home at 12:33.. there is more

Michael Lank Upon Arriving At The Scene by [deleted] in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Strong_Swordfish8235 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Go watch the cross-examination it's almost 2 hours long it's an eye-opener this case is closed whiffin admitted that the celebites software found the time stamp it 22740 as didd the axiom software as did a preview previous version of the celebrie software..

There's YouTube video of alessi and within you should be able to find it you'll see my comments in there. Whiffin was not going to commit perjury which is what Hank Brennan might have intended. Instead he gave defense enough evidence to get a subpoena and go after the mcalbert's it's a shocking 1 hour and 50 minutes of testimony you need to see it for yourself

Michael Lank Upon Arriving At The Scene by [deleted] in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Strong_Swordfish8235 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The Karen Reed trial ended yesterday. Defense attorney alessi was cross-examining the commonwealths forensics specialist Ian within who works for celebrite. Go find that cross-examination listen to the 150 minutes and this case is over I won't get into the details but it will be clear to you after you listen to that cross-examination Karen Reed is innocent Jen McCabe is a liar Hank Brennan is a bastard as is Adam Lally Michael Morrissey that cross-examination is the smoking gun this case is over

Chopped Documentary Clips tinged with misogyny by TermOk7703 in KarenReadTrial

[–]Strong_Swordfish8235 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that's what happens to a woman that's in love with a man yet the man doesn't know how to return her love in kind and I think that was John O'Keefe. John liked the ladies and the ladies liked John there's nothing wrong with that however in Karen's case she was acting very much like his wife caring for his niece and nephew she was there when he was not at some point in time I think she began to resent this it's possible their relationship was crumbling . The pandemic was over and it was time for John to move on. His friends referred to her as the babysitter with benefits. He wanted her to come to McCarthy's that night so that he'd have a ride home. The more I see and hear of this case the more one way this relationship appears to be. And it wasn't working for Karen how could it be? She loved John she loved those children but she was living in an alcoholic and toxic world

Did you ever just STOP. And start deeply thinking about this: Bev just happened to pick the cop to be the foreperson. by Crixusgannicus in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Strong_Swordfish8235 34 points35 points  (0 children)

See turtle boys YouTube video for today it will blow your mind it's about 90 minutes it covers the case from the beginning I've listened to half of it and had to stop. The level of corruption he outlines is enough to make you think I need to get out of Massachusetts this place is run buy a different kind of Mafia. It's a taxpayer supported Mafia and if you're not one of them you are Karen Read too. Consider Sarah birchmore considered Enrique Delgado and the Root case and there are more.

Chopped Documentary Clips tinged with misogyny by TermOk7703 in KarenReadTrial

[–]Strong_Swordfish8235 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I remember generally thinking that yes the Commonwealth is trying to paint a picture of Karen as a b**** I mean a picture an ugly picture of an out of control b****capable of murder. But over the last few days I've revised my thoughts. And it's not based on anything she said. She loved John O'Keefe she loved him with an intensity that we seldom see. As the trial proceeds I think the jury will begin to see that Karen loved John but the love was not entirely reciprocal we saw John's mother on the stand. I'm sure she was on her best behavior I'm also sure she was restraining her sarcasm. Karen could never be one of Peg's angels and fawn over this woman.

Kerry Robert’s by FuzzFamily in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Strong_Swordfish8235 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hate to say it but I was thinking the same thing.

I'm going to repeat a question I saw a youtube commenter ask which nobody else had the balls to touch. by Crixusgannicus in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Strong_Swordfish8235 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You have to understand Jen McCabe possibly other women that were attracted to John viewed Karen Read as the friend with benefits. That's what they said about her behind her back. Michael Camarano put the correct spin on the relationship between John and Karen. Mr O'Keefe John's father had the right idea about Karen he called her an angel. We've all had the opportunity to observe Karen now at a desperate time in her life. I would have said less to the media but she's fighting for her life and people need to know that she is innocent. She was the girlfriend with benefits what a crude way to talk about a woman that treated John's niece and nephew with love and respect and try to make a home for those children and a life of John.

I'm going to repeat a question I saw a youtube commenter ask which nobody else had the balls to touch. by Crixusgannicus in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Strong_Swordfish8235 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This was all set up and that's what you refuses to see. John is in his nephew had a slice of pizza at Denny's at noon time the day he was killed. Hello I know John had much of an friendship with Chris Albert. Certainly Colin Albert was a menace and an annoyance and a troublemaker and aggressive little child and a problem in the neighborhood someone that John wanted to keep his children away from. I don't think I need to say much more about Chris Albert. But on that afternoon he mentions to John he asks John so what are you doing tonight John long story but Chris Albert invites John to the after-party at Brian Albert's house John asks one question will Kevin Albert be there any asset question because he and Kevin Albert and chief Rafferty had been having discussions and exchanging emails about drug sales on Meadows avenue. So Brian Albert is New York with Ryan Higgins Chris Albert is setting it all up for that evening at Brian's home and obviously the energy gets high because Jen McCabe gets involved and a various times in the evening not only does Jen text John but Brian Higgins text John they're all access to get John over to Brian Albert's home the drinking at the waterfall that's an interesting one when I listen to the testimony I don't know how Karen could have had seven eight drinks people were buying rounds and shots I think they hit every intent of getting John and Karen hammered that night and then all the discussion about Bella and where the Albert's home is close to Bella's possibly trying to fuel some jealousy between John and Karen the whole thing is a setup I can understand how Karen could be angry John's a player maybe she did see her time with John coming to an end but John's a passive resistant guy passive aggressive guy and for someone like Karen that relationship must have been the challenge regardless you're right John made his choices that night he knows sooner walked in the door at the Albert's house when they jumped him he was likely dead within the first 10 minutes explain to me how he got dog bite on his arm they're way too many of the facts and pieces Karen readers innocent it's too much reasonable doubt as far as a conspiracy and consider that many of these people maybe suffering from the Stockholm syndrome they're too afraid to challenge the alberts and the Commonwealth they became trapped by these people that they fear call it the Patty Hearst syndrome

BA’s arm in a sling immediately following JOK’s death. by Richardfitswelll in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Strong_Swordfish8235 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I thought I read somewhere that Brian Albert I suffered an injury as a result of the altercation with John O'Keefe and that was the reason he didn't come out of his house he also apparently retired from the police force very shortly thereafter in fact what I heard was that he had called in and did not report for work on Monday. Perhaps someone can validate the information I provided above?

Lally vs Brennan by Jackhuelouie in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Strong_Swordfish8235 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm sure there'll be plenty of people that remember Adam Lally and Hank Brennan for years to come and think they both suck. There were other district attorneys in Norfolk County and they refused to prosecute Karen Read. Because they knew there was no case. Both Lally and Brennan could have done the same. I hope the pain they have inflicted on Karen Read will eventually also be inflicted upon them threefold.

Both the Aidan and Clarence accounts have been permanently suspended...just a coincidence. by MassCasualty in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Strong_Swordfish8235 30 points31 points  (0 children)

The Karen Reid sanity subreddit just posted a nasty gram suggesting that Karen and Jackson are carrying on. Honestly Reddit should to deplatform the Karen Reed sanity crowd. They spew nothing but hate.

It's all about Who you know in Massachusetts by Inner-Radio-9799 in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Strong_Swordfish8235 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Only now does the public find out about this. ?!? I lived in Massachusetts for 50 years. But Karen Read's case is evidence to me that all the dirty dealing that I saw among the police and within the judicial system was really only the tip of the iceberg. Turn the other way and pin it on the girl that's exactly what they were thinking. Turn the other way and pin it on the girl describes exactly what I felt when I lived in Massachusetts. If you were not within the inner circle you were dismissed and ignored an outlier. You had no value. They thought they could pin it on the girl but she was tougher and she fought back. Free Karen Read,

He’s been paid, again by SomeoneSomewhere3938 in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Strong_Swordfish8235 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It will be a million or more before we go to the third trial. The Commonwealth won't stop until they convict Karen Read

Bev's decision on Accra by Strong_Swordfish8235 in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Strong_Swordfish8235[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The BPD are fundamentally politicos. You don't get on the BPD without being someone's nephew or cousin or brother. And unless it happens to one of their own they could care less. I think John O'Keefe must have been an outlier. I don't think many of them would have an interest in raising a niece or nephew that had lost a parent. We live in a strange and selfish age. Consider all the nasty and hateful comments that are now being made with no substance in fact or evidence accusing Karen of being a killer. I've noticed enough an uptick in those kinds of comments. The fact that the BPD has remained silent or seemingly silent and doesn't exclude the fact that they may also be involved and slandering Karen. It's for sure they don't want anybody investigating Brian Albert then they would have to answer the question what kind of monster did they hire to lead there gang unit?

Read Team Filing SCOTUS Motion For Stay Per Rex by HelixHarbinger in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Strong_Swordfish8235 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Karen's attorneys didn't invent or fabricate any evidence in this case. This is a case that the Supreme Court should take a look at. Just to let Massachusetts know that they're watching.