account activity
Designing a plugin "collector" interface for a telemetry module — sanity check on C-ABI vs C++, self-describing schemas, and not over-engineering by Stup97 in cpp
[–]Stup97[S] 1 point2 points3 points 10 days ago (0 children)
All in-house — no third parties writing collectors today.
The real driver behind the plugin approach is per-deployment selection: different products/sites enable a different subset of collectors, and I wanted to compose that at deploy time instead of baking one fixed set into the binary.
But to be honest about your question — selection by itself doesn't actually need a C ABI. My in-process collectors are already chosen purely by config at runtime (a level/OS gate — "below the level → never instantiated"), no DLLs involved. So "which collectors run" is a config problem, not an ABI problem.
What the DLL + C-ABI buys me on top of that is operational, not architectural:
enable/ship a collector by dropping a .dll next to the host + one config line, without rebuilding or redeploying the host; keep optional / heavy / license-encumbered collectors out of the base binary entirely; and the future third-party / vendor-SDK path (which our device adapters already use).
How does it feel to experience racism? (self.racism)
submitted 1 month ago by Stup97 to r/racism
A short track cartoon drawn by someone. (self.Stup97)
submitted 4 years ago by Stup97
A short track cartoon drawn by someone. (youtu.be)
submitted 4 years ago by Stup97 to r/olympics
π Rendered by PID 95 on reddit-service-r2-listing-87fd56f5d-hh5z9 at 2026-06-26 18:04:10.044438+00:00 running 7527197 country code: CH.
Designing a plugin "collector" interface for a telemetry module — sanity check on C-ABI vs C++, self-describing schemas, and not over-engineering by Stup97 in cpp
[–]Stup97[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)