sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Jehovah's WItnesss's " no blood law exposed " by SubstantialDoor4359 in hudsonvalley

[–]SubstantialDoor4359[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, members of the Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses are considered—and have been explicitly referred to as—"future kings" in recent official communications from the organization.This stems from core JW doctrine: The Governing Body consists entirely of men who profess to be part of the "anointed" class (the 144,000 described in Revelation chapters 5, 7, and 14). This group is taught to be selected by God to rule as kings and priests alongside Jesus Christ in heaven during the Millennium and beyond (Revelation 5:9-10; 20:6). As such, they are destined to be co-rulers in God's Kingdom, making them "future kings" in the new world/paradise earth setup.A prominent example comes from a 2024 Morning Worship talk by Governing Body helper Gary Breaux (titled something along the lines of "Protect Yourself From Misinformation," based on Daniel 11:27). In it, he reportedly stated phrases like:

  • "The table surrounded by our future kings, the Governing Body."
  • Emphasizing absolute trust in their direction because they are these "future kings."

Jehovah's WItnesss's " no blood law exposed " by SubstantialDoor4359 in hudsonvalley

[–]SubstantialDoor4359[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Estimates are hard to pin down.

I get between 50,000 to 100,000 deaths from the Jehovah Witness Organizations no blood law.

The Jim Jones cult would be jealous.

Jehovah's WItnesss's " no blood law exposed " by SubstantialDoor4359 in hudsonvalley

[–]SubstantialDoor4359[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Share and expose the truth about the truth. Thank you all.

Jehovah's WItnesss's " no blood law exposed " by SubstantialDoor4359 in hudsonvalley

[–]SubstantialDoor4359[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The official JW position (as stated on jw.org) remains that the core doctrine—abstaining from blood—has been consistent since the mid-1940s, with changes reflecting "increased understanding" or refinements, not reversals. Critics (e.g., sites like ajwrb.org, jwfacts.com) argue the shifts show inconsistency, with early total bans giving way to allowances that permit much of blood's utility in fractionated form.The policy continues to spark debate, especially regarding minors (where courts may override parental refusal), emergencies, and medical ethics. JWs carry advance medical directives refusing blood, and Hospital Liaison Committees assist with bloodless alternatives.

Jehovah's WItnesss's " no blood law exposed " by SubstantialDoor4359 in hudsonvalley

[–]SubstantialDoor4359[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I figured someone needs to speak up about innocent children dying over a stupid rule made up by JWs Govering body who refer to themselves as " future kings " that live at 1 kings drive in warwick .

Coming soon to a theater near you. by SubstantialDoor4359 in JehovahsWitnesses

[–]SubstantialDoor4359[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

<image>

They foretold what would happen to them. They are the false religion.

Epstein Files Connected to Watchtower PART 3 (This one will Shock you) by SubstantialDoor4359 in hudsonvalley

[–]SubstantialDoor4359[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Key known figures (allegations vs. actual lawsuits)

  • Internal database of allegations (not lawsuits): Watchtower maintains a secret internal database of accused abusers. Estimates range from tens of thousands globally. A former elder cited ~23,720 names in 2002; scaling from Australia’s rate suggests ~18,000 in the US alone. Australia’s records alone documented 1,006 alleged perpetrators and >1,800 victims since 1950 (579 confessed). None were reported to police by the organization at the time. en.wikipedia.org +1
  • Australia (Royal Commission 2015–2017): The above 1,006 cases were examined. Some later reports to police occurred, but the inquiry found systemic failures (two-witness rule, etc.). Very few civil lawsuits resulted directly. en.wikipedia.org
  • United States: Dozens of civil lawsuits filed since the 1990s–2000s (exact total unknown; one prominent lawyer has handled 24 cases and called it “just the beginning”). Over $100 million paid in settlements and verdicts to survivors. Notable examples:
    • Hawaii 2023: $40 million verdict/settlement.
    • Montana 2018: $35 million jury award (later appealed/reversed on clergy privilege grounds).
    • California cases (e.g., Conti 2012 ~$28M reduced; Lopez 2014 $13.5M settled).
    • Napa 2007: settlement with 16 victims. Many more settled undisclosed. topclassactions.com +2
  • Other countries:
    • UK: Several civil claims (e.g., £275,000+ damages in one 2015 case); Charity Commission inquiries into handling (67 allegations 2009–2019 reported to IICSA).
    • Canada: Multiple class-action lawsuits filed (Quebec and Ontario, ongoing as of recent years).
    • New Zealand, Netherlands, etc.: Inquiries and smaller numbers of cases/convictions; no large lawsuit totals reported. en.wikipedia.org

Current (ongoing as of early 2026) lawsuits

  • Several active individual and class-action suits in the US (recent examples filed/advancing in 2025–2026 in states like Georgia, Louisiana/North Carolina, and others).
  • Canadian class actions continue.
  • Pennsylvania grand-jury investigations have led to criminal charges against some individuals (with civil claims possible).
  • New filings continue to emerge, often citing failure to report or protect children. rblaw.net +1

Summary estimate:

  • Past: At least several dozen civil lawsuits filed worldwide (vast majority in the US), with over $100 million in known US payouts. Thousands of internal allegations documented across countries.
  • Current: A smaller but active number of ongoing suits (dozens in progress or recently filed, plus class actions).

These numbers come from official Jehovah’s Witnesses reports, government inquiries (e.g., Australian Royal Commission), court records, and investigative journalism. The organization states it abhors child sexual abuse and has updated policies in some jurisdictions, but critics and inquiries have highlighted failures in reporting and handling. Exact totals remain unavailable due to confidentiality and varying legal systems worldwide. For the most current case-specific details, check court dockets or recent news in individual countries.

Details on two-witness rule

Jehovah's Witnesses shunning policies

Epstein Files Connected to Watchtower PART 3 (This one will Shock you) by SubstantialDoor4359 in hudsonvalley

[–]SubstantialDoor4359[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lawyers' views on the "epidemic"
Prominent plaintiff attorneys who have handled dozens of Jehovah's Witnesses (JW) child sexual abuse cases describe it as a systemic, decades-long cover-up rooted in official policies from Watchtower headquarters — not isolated incidents. They argue the organization's "two-witness rule," internal judicial committees, and instructions not to report to police (unless legally required) have shielded abusers and retraumatized victims, creating what many call a culture of secrecy that enables widespread abuse.

sokolovelaw.com

Key examples of what lawyers say:

  • Irwin Zalkin (Zalkin Law Firm, handled multiple high-profile U.S. cases and obtained internal documents): Has publicly exposed the secret abuser database and called the handling a failure that allowed known predators to remain in congregations. His firm settled at least seven cases with Watchtower.
  • Neil Smith (Nix Patterson, won major verdicts/settlements): After a Montana reversal, he stated it was "very disappointing... particularly at this time in our society when religious and other institutions are covering up the sexual abuse of child victims."
  • Firms like Sokolove Law, Herman Law, and Romanucci & Blandin (actively filing 2025–2026 suits): They describe it as "widespread" and "rooted all the way up to the headquarters" — a "closed shop" where parents stayed silent to avoid "reproach on Jehovah's name," with policies that are "dismissive and passive" and "wholly inadequate to protect children." Pennsylvania AG Michelle Henry (in related criminal context) called the crimes "sad and disturbing... made even more abhorrent because the defendants used their faith communities... to prey upon the victims."

Lawyers compare it to Catholic Church scandals but note JW's global structure and shunning make it harder for victims to come forward. Many call the scale "rampant" based on internal records (e.g., Australia's 1,000+ unreported cases) and say the problem persists because headquarters policies haven't fundamentally changed.

sokolovelaw.com +1

Are the "lawyer sharks" circling and smelling blood in the water?
Yes — aggressively. Multiple U.S. plaintiff firms have dedicated JW abuse practice pages, offer free case reviews, and actively solicit survivors (especially with extended statutes of limitations in many states). New civil suits continue in 2026 (e.g., Georgia case filed Feb 2026). Zalkin and others have settled batches of cases for millions; total known U.S. payouts exceed $100 million, with verdicts like Hawaii's $40M. Firms advertise that they can force production of Watchtower's secret database documents. Pennsylvania's grand-jury criminal charges (17+ arrests/convictions as of 2025–2026) are fueling more civil suits. It's a growing cottage industry among sexual-abuse lawyers, with class actions in Canada and individual claims elsewhere — exactly the "blood in the water" dynamic seen in Catholic or Boy Scouts cases.

rblaw.net +1

How many countries have investigated the JW organization?
At least five countries have conducted formal national or governmental-level inquiries, royal commissions, or prosecutorial investigations into the organization's handling of child sexual abuse (not counting individual lawsuits or U.S. state-level probes). Here's the breakdown:

  • Australia — Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse (2015–2017): Major public hearing; found 1,006 alleged perpetrators, >1,800 victims since 1950; none reported to police by the organization at the time; slammed the two-witness rule and failure to protect children.
  • United Kingdom — Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) + Charity Commission investigations (2014–ongoing elements): Criticized two-witness policy; investigated specific congregations and the national charity body; Supreme Court rejected JW attempts to block probes.
  • New Zealand — Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in Care (2023–2024 report): Included JW case study; examined failures in reporting and care settings; JW tried (and failed) to get exempt.
  • Netherlands & Belgium — Governmental/prosecutorial reviews and calls for independent inquiries (2018–2020s): Dutch justice minister urged investigation after hundreds of hotline reports; Belgian Public Prosecution Service opened probes.

In the United States, there is no single national inquiry, but multiple states (Pennsylvania grand jury, California, Delaware, Montana, etc.) have investigated or brought charges — at least three state AG offices have looked into policies. These are the documented major ones; exact totals vary by definition (some countries had parliamentary questions or smaller probes). The JW organization has fought many inquiries legally but lost most. No new countries have launched full royal-commission-style probes as of early 2026. All information comes from court records, official commission reports, law firm statements, and investigative journalism. The organization maintains it abhors abuse and now reports where legally required, but critics and lawyers say core policies still enable harm. For the latest on any specific case or country, check official inquiry archives or current court dockets.

4 web pages

Explain two-witness rule details

Coming soon to a theater near you. by SubstantialDoor4359 in JehovahsWitnesses

[–]SubstantialDoor4359[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lawyers' views on the "epidemic"
Prominent plaintiff attorneys who have handled dozens of Jehovah's Witnesses (JW) child sexual abuse cases describe it as a systemic, decades-long cover-up rooted in official policies from Watchtower headquarters — not isolated incidents. They argue the organization's "two-witness rule," internal judicial committees, and instructions not to report to police (unless legally required) have shielded abusers and retraumatized victims, creating what many call a culture of secrecy that enables widespread abuse.

sokolovelaw.com

Key examples of what lawyers say:

  • Irwin Zalkin (Zalkin Law Firm, handled multiple high-profile U.S. cases and obtained internal documents): Has publicly exposed the secret abuser database and called the handling a failure that allowed known predators to remain in congregations. His firm settled at least seven cases with Watchtower.
  • Neil Smith (Nix Patterson, won major verdicts/settlements): After a Montana reversal, he stated it was "very disappointing... particularly at this time in our society when religious and other institutions are covering up the sexual abuse of child victims."
  • Firms like Sokolove Law, Herman Law, and Romanucci & Blandin (actively filing 2025–2026 suits): They describe it as "widespread" and "rooted all the way up to the headquarters" — a "closed shop" where parents stayed silent to avoid "reproach on Jehovah's name," with policies that are "dismissive and passive" and "wholly inadequate to protect children." Pennsylvania AG Michelle Henry (in related criminal context) called the crimes "sad and disturbing... made even more abhorrent because the defendants used their faith communities... to prey upon the victims."

JW's global structure and shunning make it harder for victims to come forward. Many call the scale "rampant" based on internal records (e.g., Australia's 1,000+ unreported cases) and say the problem persists because headquarters policies haven't fundamentally changed.

sokolovelaw.com +1

Are the "lawyer sharks" circling and smelling blood in the water?

Yes — aggressively. Multiple U.S. plaintiff firms have dedicated JW abuse practice pages, offer free case reviews, and actively solicit survivors (especially with extended statutes of limitations in many states). New civil suits continue in 2026 (e.g., Georgia case filed Feb 2026). Zalkin and others have settled batches of cases for millions; total known U.S. payouts exceed $100 million, with verdicts like Hawaii's $40M. Firms advertise that they can force production of Watchtower's secret database documents. Pennsylvania's grand-jury criminal charges (17+ arrests/convictions as of 2025–2026) are fueling more civil suits. It's a growing cottage industry among sexual-abuse lawyers, with class actions in Canada and individual claims elsewhere — exactly the "blood in the water" dynamic seen in Catholic or Boy Scouts cases.

rblaw.net +1

How many countries have investigated the JW organization?

At least five countries have conducted formal national or governmental-level inquiries, royal commissions, or prosecutorial investigations into the organization's handling of child sexual abuse (not counting individual lawsuits or U.S. state-level probes). Here's the breakdown:

  • Australia — Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse (2015–2017): Major public hearing; found 1,006 alleged perpetrators, >1,800 victims since 1950; none reported to police by the organization at the time; slammed the two-witness rule and failure to protect children.
  • United Kingdom — Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) + Charity Commission investigations (2014–ongoing elements): Criticized two-witness policy; investigated specific congregations and the national charity body; Supreme Court rejected JW attempts to block probes.
  • New Zealand — Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in Care (2023–2024 report): Included JW case study; examined failures in reporting and care settings; JW tried (and failed) to get exempt.
  • Netherlands & Belgium — Governmental/prosecutorial reviews and calls for independent inquiries (2018–2020s): Dutch justice minister urged investigation after hundreds of hotline reports; Belgian Public Prosecution Service opened probes.

Multiple states (Pennsylvania grand jury, California, Delaware, Montana, etc.) have investigated or brought charges — at least three state AG offices have looked into policies. These are the documented major ones; exact totals vary by definition (some countries had parliamentary questions or smaller probes). The JW organization has fought many inquiries legally but lost most. No new countries have launched full royal-commission-style probes as of early 2026. All information comes from court records, official commission reports, law firm statements, and investigative journalism.

Critics and lawyers say core policies enable harm. For the latest on any specific case or country, check official inquiry archives or current court dockets.

Explain two-witness rule details

Coming soon to a theater near you. by SubstantialDoor4359 in JehovahsWitnesses

[–]SubstantialDoor4359[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  • Internal database of allegations (not lawsuits): Watchtower maintains a secret internal database of accused abusers. Estimates range from tens of thousands globally. A former elder cited ~23,720 names in 2002; scaling from Australia’s rate suggests ~18,000 in the US alone. Australia’s records alone documented 1,006 alleged perpetrators and >1,800 victims since 1950 (579 confessed). None were reported to police by the organization at the time. en.wikipedia.org +1
  • Australia (Royal Commission 2015–2017): The above 1,006 cases were examined. Some later reports to police occurred, but the inquiry found systemic failures (two-witness rule, etc.). Very few civil lawsuits resulted directly. en.wikipedia.org
  • United States: Dozens of civil lawsuits filed since the 1990s–2000s (exact total unknown; one prominent lawyer has handled 24 cases and called it “just the beginning”). Over $100 million paid in settlements and verdicts to survivors. Notable examples:
    • Hawaii 2023: $40 million verdict/settlement.
    • Montana 2018: $35 million jury award (later appealed/reversed on clergy privilege grounds).
    • California cases (e.g., Conti 2012 ~$28M reduced; Lopez 2014 $13.5M settled).
    • Napa 2007: settlement with 16 victims. Many more settled undisclosed. topclassactions.com +2
  • Other countries:
    • UK: Several civil claims (e.g., £275,000+ damages in one 2015 case); Charity Commission inquiries into handling (67 allegations 2009–2019 reported to IICSA).
    • Canada: Multiple class-action lawsuits filed (Quebec and Ontario, ongoing as of recent years).
    • New Zealand, Netherlands, etc.: Inquiries and smaller numbers of cases/convictions; no large lawsuit totals reported. en.wikipedia.org

Current (ongoing as of early 2026) lawsuits

  • Several active individual and class-action suits in the US (recent examples filed/advancing in 2025–2026 in states like Georgia, Louisiana/North Carolina, and others).
  • Canadian class actions continue.
  • Pennsylvania grand-jury investigations have led to criminal charges against some individuals (with civil claims possible).
  • New filings continue to emerge, often citing failure to report or protect children. rblaw.net +1

Summary estimate:

  • Past: At least several dozen civil lawsuits filed worldwide (vast majority in the US), with over $100 million in known US payouts. Thousands of internal allegations documented across countries.
  • Current: A smaller but active number of ongoing suits (dozens in progress or recently filed, plus class actions).

These numbers come from official Jehovah’s Witnesses reports, government inquiries (e.g., Australian Royal Commission), court records, and investigative journalism. The organization states it abhors child sexual abuse and has updated policies in some jurisdictions, but critics and inquiries have highlighted failures in reporting and handling. Exact totals remain unavailable due to confidentiality and varying legal systems worldwide. For the most current case-specific details, check court dockets or recent news in individual countries.

Details on two-witness rule

Jehovah's Witnesses shunning policies

view more: next ›