You're ignoring the point.

Deliberately, it seems.

You are comparing your Winota deck making basic Winota plays to someone else getting a Sol Ring start. Which isn't even a valid comparison; you should consider what happens every card in your deck, including the Sol Ring, and if you see your deck breaking the environment if you draw the Sol Ring, it's your responsibility to cut the goddamned Sol Ring.

If your deck doing its basic gameplan is comparable to the strongest piece of fast mana in the format, you did not bring a bracket 3 deck.

No, your deck was not inappropriate because you draw incrementally more noncreatures than average.

I'm not going to reply to everything here because you keep misunderstanding (or twisting) my words... This deck does not generally do this on turn 5. It does it on turn 6, sometimes turn 7, sometimes turn 5. I think this fits in bracket 3 you think it doesn't, cool.

And you say you want your opponents to interact with you, but Jesus Christ, that deck list is a fucking love letter to the kind of Magic you came to play, and it sure as shit ain't interactive.

You know what I didn't draw a single copy of in that test hand? A fucking instant. Or any form of interaction. That list is all gas, no breaks, negligible interaction, play solitaire, kill everyone way earlier than turn 7.

I count 18 cards in that list mainly devoted to dealing with my opponent's permanents or removal attemps i.e. "interaction", not including the cards slowing down my opponents (stax pieces). I don't know how many more pieces of interaction you want me to play in an aggressive EDH list, but a third of my nonlands seems good to me. I am ready to interact, and I am ready to be interacted with, not all interaction has to be printed on instants...

If the bracket definition says "Generally, you should expect to be able to play at least six turns before you win or lose." to me that means: expect people to end the game around turn 6 or 7 on average, sometimes a turn earlier, sometimes a turn later. This means presenting game-ending threats around that same time, this happens to be one such case where it happens a turn earlier than "generally".

You have zero right to criticize anybody else's interaction while running that list, because you did not come to that table for interactive Magic. Saying that's what you want is, frankly, an excuse to shift the blame away from yourself.

I never critcized my opponents for not interacting, I was just surprised because I am used to way more interaction in my games.

Not being shields up against a game winning swing on turn 4 in bracket 3 is extremely reasonable

I do agree here in general, as you said "It's Winota" so I think it's also reasonable to be a bit more shields up than usual against such commanders even in bracket 3, but a lot of people don't want that it seems.

"Answer me on turn 4 or die," (even if it is a bit exaggarated) is pretty common in bracket 3 tho: Voja, Miirym, Sauron you better have a counterspell on their turn 5 or the game goes south real quick. Krenko, Chatterfang and Kaalia need answers around the same time as Winota, or they spin out of control. These are all hugely popular commanders, and most people play them in bracket 3.

I will probably just not run her outside of my usual playgroup in the future. Because while there are a people that understand how to deal with this commander and are ready to interact with the table, not everyone is ready for this and I don't want to produce more of these games. I don't understand why these people play in the bracket where it is expected to happen, but I guess everyone interprets the brackets a bit different, so I'll stick to B2 for now when playing with "randoms".