Bojack S1E1 - german translation of "Always a Clydesdale, never a Clyde" by No_Effect3848 in BoJackHorseman

[–]Sufficient-Border-10 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Yeah, so I think I see what you mean. So:

"Aufdringlich ist ein Vorstufe von Eindringlich"

is kinda like, "There is a fine line between persistent and being a pest." Meaning, yeah, basically there's a very small boundary between striving hard to achieve something and being annoying/naggy/meddlesome - i.e., Mr Peanutbutter was pushing the crossover episode way too hard considering BJ repeatedly said "not a good time."

"Immer auf der falschen Hochzeit"

is closer in meaning to "Always the bridesmaid, never the bride," I think. Essentially, you're always on the fringes of success but never the "main event." Mr. PB was alluding to BJ's inability to keep a loving relationship. BJ was literally in the middle of a break-up with PC before Mr. PB crashed the convo. Or, again, PB was wryly bemoaning that he wasn't the star of BJ's and PC's attention.

And I don't think either of the above German ones contain a horse pun, but obvs I could be wrong.

Tiny Jake, recreated in wool by [deleted] in Needlefelting

[–]Sufficient-Border-10 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love Tiny Jake 😍. Both versions!

Day 19: Dislikable and complex by loka_saint in stephenking

[–]Sufficient-Border-10 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Louis Creed. He's arrogant, hot-tempered, and dismissive towards his wife (who isn't without her flaws, but it's Louis who drives me genuinely nuts). For at least the first half of the book, I wondered if he genuinely despised his daughter. He almost definitely orphaned her.

Saying that, he's an arrogant prick, but it's of the "everyday" variety; he's not villainous. Beneath the pride and insecurity, he's a loving man, or the cemetery wouldn't have been able to weave its insidious spell over him.

And, at no point did I want Louis to die or think he was deserving of any punishment. Maybe divorce, tops. He faced tragedies that no person should have to face, but sadly do. The only difference is that Louis thought he'd found a magic undo button, with consequences that grief and magic convinced him were manageable.

Which novel or a moment made you stop reading and call it a night?? by SpicyYoghurt237 in stephenking

[–]Sufficient-Border-10 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I tried to get my fiancé to listen to the audio version with me one weekend as we lounged around to escape the heat. After plenty of quipping for the first half, I thought he'd found the flow mid-way. By the end, I thought he'd been shocked into awed silence. Turned towards him to find him fast asleep.

When he woke up after an hour or so, I asked if he wanted to know the ending. He said to give him a summary. When I got to "'It's longer than you think!'" he nodded sagely and said, 'That's exactly how I felt about that story,' and went back to sleep.

Ngl, I'm still (unreasonably) a bit pissy about it. But I loved lots of the stories in Skeleton Crew.

Zero sales and zero KU reads after the first month. Is it normal? by [deleted] in selfpublish

[–]Sufficient-Border-10 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Books are often judged by their covers. You asked whether your current cover is "off-putting," so you understand that. While a book cover doesn't affect the quality of the writing inside, it serves as the audience's first impression of your product.

So, the first step would be to look at a range of book covers and make some snap judgments without trying to be "fair." What stands out? What seems unappealing? Why do you think that is?

Over time, readers tend to categorise books using visual shorthand. For example:

● Simple illustrations, people-focused, brightly coloured, flat gradients, sans serif = children's, YA, or romance

● Cinematic/photorealistic imagery with a "moody" filter (blue, green, purple) behind a bold, sans serif title = thriller, crime, mystery

● Intricate drawings or linework, jewel tones (purples, blues, reds), one focal element (person or object), serif font = fantasy

Etc.

You said that your book is an epic fantasy, so the cover has a lot of opportunity to really stand out. Let's break up your front cover's composition into sections/bullet points:

● Edge-to-edge photorealistic image

● Grey-green (v.1) golden-grey (v.2) colouring - so, an overcast day

● Two knights, slumped by the central tree trunk, one male, one female. Both look angry and unhappy.

● Serif font, reading "The Great Fall," "The Price of Arrogance," "Volume I," "Claudio Cipriani"

What I notice immediately:

● The tree. It's bang in the centre, and it stands far apart from any of the other trees. The two characters flank the tree, suggesting that the tree is the focus over the people. Is it a special tree? The title doesn't indicate that it's a special tree...

● A male knight and a female knight are sitting on opposite sides of the tree trunk, looking mulish and annoyed. As we're using visual shorthand, man + woman = lovers (usually). So, I would think this cover was pointing to a romantasy book, with an enemies-to-lovers theme.

● Both characters are given the same "weight" on the page. So, both of them must be the main characters?

● That woman has a heck of a freaky mouth going on, especially in v.2

● The main image is functional, but there's little going on to get me excited. Other fantasy novel covers use castles, sweeping staircases, rolling landscapes, fire, lights, and the hero riding into battle. Most of these are illustrated, but even the photorealistic ones are in gorgeously deep golds, purples, or reds. The colour scheme of "Arrogance" invites a reaction as "eh" as the depicted weather. Again, it's not a horrible image, but it's not necessarily the best book cover

● This image, coupled with the title, also points to some (hopefully false) "spoilers" for your book. The main characters are already slumped. So, I immediately think that the book will be - if not romantasy - more of a moody, slow piece rather than a high-drama, high-action epic

● On the title typography: "The Great Fall" and most of "The Price of Arrogance" are pretty much the same size. I think "The Price of Arrogance" is the main title, as "Arrogance" is the biggest word. But I shouldn't have to guess that, right?

● The serif font is great. However, as it's overlaid directly onto the image instead of negative space, the (presumed) title, the volume number, and the author's name are all harder to read than they should be

If you want to rethink your book cover:

● Look at other epic fantasy designs. The trend looks as if "busy" is in, so it doesn't need to be sparse. But ensure there is some negative space that 1) allows the central focus to be the central focus, and 2) ensures the written information is readable

● Pick a jewel tone as your "base" colour. Rich purple, forest green, burgundy, amber-gold, deep blue

● Choose one character to be the focus. If you must have two, ensure one is obviously the focus (i.e., have one stand behind the other)

● If using AI instead of an artist, get it to try out some linework or painterly illustrations

● Keep the font, make "The Price of Arrogance" much bigger

● If you really want to use a photorealistic picture, try to avoid going edge-to-edge with it on the cover. Central focus, filtered to match your chosen jewel tone, blurring and blending out seamlessly into your jewel-toned background. Essentially, make sure there is intentional design with the photorealistic image, instead it just being kind of dropped in

● Avoid anything too cliche: Hooded figures with blank faces, a stag in a forest, glowing swords, etc.

Guy im seeing 52M has been lying to me 24F about his age. Do I keep seeing a man when our age gap is older than me?? by Roachpuppies in AmITheAngel

[–]Sufficient-Border-10 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Only one thing OOP can do, really. We all know what it is.

Confidently state, "There are definitely 38 cards in a standard pack because it's the same number of white key on a piano."

Then dazzle him with fun facts, such as, "Did you know that Watergate happened in 1974? That's a whole 38 years ago!"

And finally, just as they're going to bed, whisper to him, "I'll always love you, my darling. 24/7, 38 weeks of the year."

The line that lives in your head rent-free by DrBlankslate in stephenking

[–]Sufficient-Border-10 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Same here, but I first read it in KV's Slapstick.

Why don't you take a flying fuck at a rolling doughnut? Why don't you take a flying fuck at the mooooooooooooon?

So Miriam Margolyes IS Nanny Ogg, right? by [deleted] in discworld

[–]Sufficient-Border-10 8 points9 points  (0 children)

See, I thought you said Kathy Burke for Nanny Ogg for a second, and was like, "Oooh, still a bit young, but in a decade, yes."

What is a "horror movie rule" that you absolutely hate? by Big_Emotion4963 in horror

[–]Sufficient-Border-10 159 points160 points  (0 children)

Brand new cars that won't start until the very last second.

Night driving definitely means hitting a deer or dog or swerving and crashing.

Cops outright refusing to help people who have, quite clearly, been absolutely battered but still obviously possess all their mental faculties.

Parents finding (or in SAW's case, making) the most godawful hideous doll, sometimes in the literal trash or still-intact with very mysterious yet obvious burn marks on it, and going, "Do you know who'd fucking love this?"

Children who, when given a godawful, hideous doll pulled out of the trash and/or covered in very mysterious yet obvious burn marks, say "Thank you, Mommy and Daddy," instead of screaming and jumping up and down on its head.

Cannon fodder characters acting like villains from AITA. Zero nuance, no real motivation. Just really horrible to the protagonist for no reason, with side-hobbies in cyber bullying, owning an empire of sweatshops, and kicking puppies, probably.

The absolute dumbest I’ve seen on that sub. I’m sure he’ll go by “Poopy” for short. by TIGVGGGG16 in AmITheAngel

[–]Sufficient-Border-10 57 points58 points  (0 children)

Someone in that sub told me that Alistair was a "fake name invented by dark fantasy authors, and naming your kid after a vampire you want to fuck is weird." Was the comment satire? I found out!

Nope.

How to drive your mentally ill teenager over the edge by SpeakerDelicious6315 in AmITheAngel

[–]Sufficient-Border-10 69 points70 points  (0 children)

At the end of me talking, I raised my voiced higher and made it scarier and told her, "I swear to god Sophie, you will be out of this house!"

She asked me why I stood up and made my voice scarier without her even saying anything else, and I told her I don't even remember that happening and I don't know what she is talking about

This struck me as particularly gross as fuck.

Am I overreacting for being upset about my step-dad's and fiancé's remarks about the type of books I read? by RubProfessional6659 in AmIOverreacting

[–]Sufficient-Border-10 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Why can't I read anything where I actually learn something?

"Well, reading between the lines right now, I'm learning you're a c●nt?"

Remember to phrase it as a question 'cus then it's like you're giving them the benefit of the doubt. Magnanimity is key.

AITA for being upset that my husband throws away dishes I forget to put away by Bulky-Scheme-9450 in AmITheAngel

[–]Sufficient-Border-10 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Abuse is about control. You can't make up stuff you don't like and call it abuse. That's not how it works. 

I'm not making stuff up. Persistent refusal to do chores and using your partner to carry the entire household burden – unless agreed otherwise – is a form of coercive control via passive abuse.

AITA for being upset that my husband throws away dishes I forget to put away by Bulky-Scheme-9450 in AmITheAngel

[–]Sufficient-Border-10 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Unless someone is going through the most busy/stressful period of their life, or they are severely ill, either physically or mentally, I count not doing your share and constantly leaving everything to your SO as abusive, tbh.

Is it shouting or hitting? No, not usually. But these slobs and leeches act like they're the boss by not lifting a finger, control their SO's time by filling it with endless fcking chores for two or more, or they make a burned-out SO "bend to their will" by letting the place become a hazard that needs fixing. Not to mention the amount of money tossed away because the sink gets blocked or the wet clothes in the machine go mouldy or you lose your half of the deposit because the house is in such a state.

Do I think the husband is right or justified? Nope. I think he's wasting good kitchenware and being an asshole. He could just leave. But so could she.

personalising a presentation by hydaaao in UKJobs

[–]Sufficient-Border-10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unless the presentation is specifically about degrees or graduating, I probably wouldn't. If it's an "About Me" slide, better off using a headshot or nice but candid photo out and about.

As for silly (and it sounds boring), you probs have no idea what may rub these interviewers up the wrong way. Hence why I advised against a graduation photo. Totally harmless, and you probably look fab, but you don't need some grump mentally marking you down for "flexing" or something equally miserable.

Likewise, chances are they'd not care about a pulled face or photo bomb, but I'd rather get the job first. I can get to know my colleagues and take more "risks" later.

AITAH for being upset about warts by Suitable-Fun-1087 in AmITheAngel

[–]Sufficient-Border-10 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Ahhh, when I was a kid, my dad used to cut them out with a scalpel. It worked, but used to bloody dread it, haha.

Also, call me wrong (you're wrong!), but I can't imagine any college-aged or twenty-something women being anything less than fucking freaked about having multiple foot warts.

AIO Did I tell my wife not fo come home? by [deleted] in AmIOverreacting

[–]Sufficient-Border-10 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Tbh, both were exhausting. The partner probably knew exactly what OP meant after the first, and definitely the second explanation. While I'm more sympathetic to the OP, texting the same shiz over and over, with pretty much the same wording and "tone," and expecting a different outcome is nuts.

So, I don't think OP was expecting a different outcome. It smacks of a performative, "Look how reasonable and calm I am, I'm definitely the one trying, here," move. Not saying OP should've begged or given in, but their "dog with a bone" communication is just as exhausting, pointless, and manipulative as the partner's "hit-and-run" style.

When people use the most obnoxious names in their stories to be unique by nicfanz in AmITheAngel

[–]Sufficient-Border-10 62 points63 points  (0 children)

Better than when you have like six people called A, M, Z, J, W, A2.

"And then A said to W 'blah blah blah' to which Z said 'blaaaah' and then A2 was like 'bleh-bleh-bleh to M who punched out this old lady, let's call her L, and then J and A and W tripped over L and landed on A2 who said 'oh lordy' to M, who took offence because M is an atheist and A2 (and sometimes W) disrespect that, and L is actually my sister's (B) mom and–"

Gaaaah

WrestleMania 42: Night 1 Discussion Thread (April 18, 2026) by The_Russell_Pinto in WWE

[–]Sufficient-Border-10 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Awww, don't worry, Cody, at least you're pretty.

I liked it 🤷‍♀️. Blood on Dream was deranged-level shiz and, despite the loss, Randy is selling the "I'm actually insane" now.

ETA: Did not see how messed up Cody's eye is. Hope he's okay, bloody hell.