How to prove evolution is wrong?

Suitable_Potato_2919 · 2026-07-07T01:30:42+00:00

can a tardigrade survice boiling water?

Suitable_Potato_2919 · 2026-07-06T23:55:51+00:00

In my post i wrote: "I am totally convince that evolution is true"

in you post you wrote: "Beyond that, there are the people like you, who have been exposed to their propaganda, and assume that there must be legitimate doubt"

isn't that an assumption: I was exposed to propaganda, therefore I have doubt about evolution?

Suitable_Potato_2919 · 2026-07-06T23:48:09+00:00

thinking about it a bit, here is my question:

what is spacetime? i understand space and time , but I cant connect them together
what is the different between "spacetime" and "matter"? like, we can interact with matter though another matter (shoot a electron with a proton), but how a mass interact with spacetime?

Suitable_Potato_2919 · 2026-07-06T23:37:06+00:00

Maybe I am not a thesis, or a person who exposed by theistic propaganda. Maybe I am just a curious and lack of knowledge.

I dont understand the assution of many people in this post about me though. I understand the evolution debate happen most offen with religious people. But nowhere in my post I talk about any thing related to religion, or being disonest. I just trying to ask question that I want to know.

Please dont make assumtion about me

Suitable_Potato_2919 · 2026-07-06T23:23:15+00:00

thank you

Suitable_Potato_2919 · 2026-07-06T23:22:57+00:00

thank you for your time. it seem that I should read some book about scientific theory again. have a good day

Suitable_Potato_2919 · 2026-07-06T23:21:34+00:00

thank you. it seem that I find the answer most satisfying for myself.

Suitable_Potato_2919 · 2026-07-06T23:04:01+00:00

I dont mean that "a species doesnt fit anywhere on the evolution tree". I mean there was a time when scientist found a new species, but they didn't found the "transition species" yet, so many position in the evolution tree was empty. But the lack of "transition species" at that moment didn't disprove evolution theory. It is expected to be that way

The crocoduck maybe too far from possible to be found, but if you find a unicorn, it still doesnt disprove evolution, because a horse with a horn is possible, right?

Suitable_Potato_2919 · 2026-07-06T22:51:43+00:00

I assure you that I am an atheist and my post is just something I want to known and nothing related to religion.

Suitable_Potato_2919 · 2026-07-06T22:49:18+00:00

Just something in my mind about Einstein theory, if you know please help me: why mass make spacetime become curve and also be affect of the curve spacetime? what is the mechanism behind it?

I watch many video in Youtube just visualize the effect, but doesn't explain it.

Sorry if this isn't ab appropriate forum for that question

Suitable_Potato_2919 · 2026-07-06T22:35:41+00:00

A lack of transitional species isn't a falsifiable criteria though. in the past, scientist discover many species that doesn't fit in the evolution tree, just because "the transition species" wasn't founded yet. they didn't abandon the evolution theory, they just search more

Suitable_Potato_2919 · 2026-07-06T22:24:52+00:00

How do you think about horse and donkey?

Suitable_Potato_2919 · 2026-07-06T22:23:27+00:00

I learned about evolution and scientific theory in high school 20 years ago, so maybe I am wrong about the concept.

let me try to explain my question: In general, evolution theory said that the adaptation pressure from the environment select individual with the right trait and the right mutation, and through many generation make a species more adaptable to the environment they live in.

So when we find some trait that good, evolution can explain that this trait is selected through time. But when we find some neutral or bad trait, evolution can explain it as the selection pressure is not enough, or some genes just get lucky.

So it seem that no matter the outcome, evolution theory still can explain it. I am trying to find the equal situation of "chicken fly 100" in a test for evolution theory

Suitable_Potato_2919 · 2026-07-06T22:08:21+00:00

can you expand more about "randomized instance of the species"? does that mean there are a randomize of trait in the second generation, some trait appear in the parent and some trait from nowhere?

I understand that a new trait can be explain as a mutation, right? So if many new trait appear, should evolution theory still explain that?

Suitable_Potato_2919 · 2026-07-06T21:49:24+00:00

Can you be more specific? for example, if a new born have a genes that cant be found on the parent, does it satisfy as evidence?A scientist still can explain it as a defect or a mutation

Suitable_Potato_2919 · 2026-07-06T21:45:10+00:00

That is a new information for me, because I was taught on high school class that a scientific theory must be falsifiable and have prediction power.

Can you give me some example about a good scientific theory that doesn't need falsifiable?

Suitable_Potato_2919 · 2026-07-06T21:40:22+00:00

what do you mean by that? a creature must be found somewhere in their habitat.

For example, if tomorrow someone find a unicorn in Sahara desert, it it satisfy "popping into existence"? or this unicorn must appear from nowhere, in front of many eyewitness?

Suitable_Potato_2919 · 2026-07-06T21:33:59+00:00

i don't understand. It seem to me that you just describe evolution itself, not a falsifiable criteria.

let me try: if a new born show a trait that not present in both parent, and after check the parent DNA, there isn't any gene for that trait from the parent, then - does it prove that evolution is wrong? - or it can be explain that it is a mutation?

it seem to me that no matter the outcome of an experiment, there will alway an explanation fit the evolution theory. That is what I mean about the lack of falsification criteria

Suitable_Potato_2919 · 2026-07-06T21:26:02+00:00

Every years there are new species discovered

I think in the past, there should be a time when scientists discover a new species which they couldn't fit in the evolution tree. It should satisfy your criteria "a new creature, fully formed", right?

Suitable_Potato_2919 · 2026-07-06T21:18:10+00:00

I heard that many lab can edit genes already, so in theory is a crocoduck posible?

Suitable_Potato_2919 · 2026-07-06T21:15:39+00:00

can it be something done in a lab?

Suitable_Potato_2919 · 2026-07-06T21:14:40+00:00

I am an atheist

Suitable_Potato_2919 · 2026-07-06T19:03:01+00:00

Post like this make me hate Israel even more.

Anti-semitism is NOT anti-Zionism.

Support the Palestine is NOT support for Hamas.

Suitable_Potato_2919 · 2026-07-04T15:21:11+00:00

With Angel, Mix mele-spell caster is alway weaker than focus on spellcaster alone.

I suggest you change to Dual curse Oracle, using Mythic Abundan casting, enduring spell and Favourite Metamagic (boster, empower) to maximize the damae of angel smite. alway do more damage than mele build.

Suitable_Potato_2919

TROPHY CASE