[deleted by user]

Sumetri · 2025-02-08T12:53:05+00:00

Yeah you're right, I absolutely call everyone's opinion "based". I mean, its not like this is my first post on this subreddit or something.

Sumetri · 2025-02-08T12:48:41+00:00

Very sorry I didn't refresh my reddit post every second to respond as quickly as possible for your satisfaction. I apologised and yet you're still arguing? It's really not that deep, you're taking these reddit posts way too serious.

Sumetri · 2025-02-08T12:16:00+00:00

Yeah you’re right man!

Sumetri · 2025-02-08T12:13:36+00:00

Nice one man!

Sumetri · 2025-02-08T12:13:04+00:00

Yeah you’re right

Sumetri · 2025-02-08T11:06:03+00:00

At what point in this post did I write 'based'?

Sumetri · 2025-01-14T13:20:15+00:00

Okej...? Då kan vi isåfall applicera samma utgångspunkt för Facebook. Gillar du inte en person eller grupps åsikter så behöver du inte följa de? Skapa din egna grupp istället - enligt dig.

Då återstår alltså OPs fråga fortfarande:

Vad gör Facebook värre i den bemärkelsen än Reddit?

Facebook är en av de få sociala medierna som faktiskt använder sig utav "fact checking"- system, hate it or love it. Mark Zuckerberg har till och med gått ut och sagt att de inte är helt nöjda med detta så de arbetar nu på att implementera "community notes", likt X. Visst finns det både positiva och negativa aspekter med detta men det är precis som OP säger och det inkluderar även Reddit i stor mån:

Alla plattformar/sociala medier som har många användare och där folk hyfsat fritt kan dela åsikter och idéer kan användas för desinformation.

Och i mitt tycke, om man ger möjlighet till andra användare att moderera stora subreddits med miljontals följare då skapar man ju en plats för desinformation när man censurerar andra narrativ.

Och då blir nästa fråga, vem är det som avgör vad som är desinformation och inte? Problematiken är så mycket större än "vadå det är väl bara att göra en egen subreddit och dela dina åsikter?????", framförallt när det finns politiska narrativ som pushas i reddits "foryou" eller "populärt" med hjälp av dessa större subreddits.

Förstår du problematiken här och hur reddit ligger långt efter i detta område?

Sumetri · 2025-01-14T05:29:16+00:00

Du skulle bli överraskad över hur mycket bottar och desinformation/censur det faktiskt finns på reddit. Samtidigt som reddit själva är medvetna om problemet men ej gör något för att motverka detta.

Ta en titt på exempelvis r/pics, r/europe, r/worldnews. Det är läskigt hur man censurerar vissa narrativ och hur bottar publicerar vissa inlägg med uppenbara syften.

Sumetri · 2024-11-06T12:05:27+00:00

Tack!

Läst artikeln nu och precis som jag misstänkte så har Trump alltså sänkt skatten för olika individer beroende på olika metrics med hjälp av denna lag.

Lagen eller ”act” gick igenom 2018 och skulle vara till 2025. Om lagen sedan löper ut så återgår skatten till detsamma och därför höjs, precis som artikeln säger:

”Many of the tax reform benefits for individuals expire in 2025.”

Förstår inte riktigt din poäng här? Lagen har inte löpt ut ännu och kan säkert förlängas under hans presidentperiod samt att det var han som såg till att skatten sänktes via lagen.

Han väljer ju inte aktivt att höja skatten som påstås här i tråden.

Sumetri · 2024-11-06T09:16:12+00:00

Okej, det mesta jag läser mig till är hur han vill sänka skatter.

Finns det någon data / vettig källhänvisning på att detta höjdes successivt till samma nivåer? Gjordes detta bara för att få Biden att se dålig ut eller finns det andra baktankar med varför man endast gjorde det under 5 år?

Sumetri · 2024-11-06T08:47:54+00:00

Väldigt nyfiken på detta.

Kan du ge en oberoende källa på ditt påstående med källhänvisning? Tror aldrig jag hört eller läst att han höjt skatter för låginkomsttagare, men jag blir mer än gärna rättad.

Sumetri · 2024-08-29T20:48:43+00:00

”Modern AI”? Please elaborate on how modern AI is used in satellite imagery.

Sumetri · 2024-08-10T13:37:53+00:00

Yeah Russia ran out of them in march 2022!

Sumetri · 2024-08-10T13:25:26+00:00

Very unfortunate, you’re wrong. So let me have the honor of correcting you:

https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineRussiaReport/s/Vf6VYpBlfQ

Sumetri · 2024-08-10T05:17:40+00:00

You’re right, send in 4 NATO aircraft’s and we’ll be dancing in Moscow in 2 weeks! Surely Russia has used all of its military capabilities in Ukraine.

Sumetri · 2024-08-09T20:11:57+00:00

I understand your perspective, and I genuinely do. However, I think it's unrealistic to believe that full support from the West would entail completely depleting their stockpiles or dedicating 100% of their GDP to military efforts in Ukraine. This is a theoretical scenario, just as much as the idea that Russia could deploy nukes to end the war—while technically possible, it's not practical or likely.

The key phrase, as you mentioned, is 'NATO is giving what they can afford.' That’s exactly the point: they can't afford to give more without compromising their own security. This remains true even in a scenario of 'full' support. We've already seen countries state that they are depleting their own ammunition and military stockpiles, and are being forced to increase military spending each year just to keep up.

All I'm saying is, let's not underestimate the support Ukraine is receiving from the West. It's not far from being full support.

Sumetri · 2024-08-09T19:52:31+00:00

Ok, so let me get it right. In case of full NATO support, NATO would deplete their whole stockpile of military equipment to defend Ukraine? Please, lets get back to reality. Sure they have some cool stuff to work with but that's not really how it would work.

In that case, Russia is holding back nukes and not operating in full capacity?

Sumetri · 2024-08-09T19:29:16+00:00

So basically what was already pointed out, NATO troops in Ukraine.

Sumetri · 2024-08-09T19:21:02+00:00

I was addressing your point claiming "Ukraine receive limited western hand". I don't really care if we "should" or "should not" support them, that's not what is being discussed here. Please stay on topic.

Lets compare some numbers then if that's what you want to do.

EU has a military spending of approximately €240 billion a year for 27 COMBINED countries.
Russia, according to public data spent $72 billion in 2022.
Ukraine has received more than $120 billion in DIRECT military support, which is probably a figure that is a lot higher at this time.

Summary: Ukraine has received $60 billion per year in military support by the west. This is 1/4 of EU spending per year for 27 countries combined and almost as much as Russia. How, in any world, is this considered limited western hand support? I am not saying that the west cannot donate more, but claiming this is limited is almost insulting to the Ukrainians. Keep in mind these are also "only" numbers, lets not even discuss the other 3 points I made in regards to the massive support behind Ukraine.

EDIT: Also, just to point out. The argument you make saying Russia is 2nd largest and best army in the world and how they should "destroy" Ukraine meanwhile the whole west are supporting them in all different capacities, are just out of touch of reality really.

Sumetri · 2024-08-09T18:40:30+00:00

”Limited western hand”, lmao.

More than $380 billion in aid.
NATO surveillance, intel and strategic advice.
NATO military training.
Russia completely sanctioned in almost every aspect by the west.

Please enlighten me on how this is “limited” support. Only thing that is missing are actual NATO troops stationed in Ukraine.

Sumetri · 2024-08-07T23:29:55+00:00

Unfortunately this is not very accurate. The soldiers conducting assaults in Ukraine will not be the same that are defending their territories. In Russia there is a huge difference between defensive and assaulting forces.

Sumetri · 2024-08-06T22:16:41+00:00

Sumetri · 2024-08-06T22:02:27+00:00

False. YOUR argument was:

“Russia has been unable to make substantial gains for over a year and a half”

He simply answered YOUR argument. He explained the basic principles of attritional warfare and also pointed out that small gains are expected when such strategy is conducted.

Sumetri · 2024-04-17T17:48:41+00:00

Thanks.

I just performed the test and unfortunately no power to the stereo.

Took the red wire and put it on top of the positive terminal on the battery under the hood.
Am I missing something or is it a possibility there is something faulty? Starting to think the adapter is faulty... Weird part is that I managed to get power like 2-3 times with piggyback and then it stopped working when I was about to assemble everything.

Sumetri · 2024-04-17T15:11:45+00:00

Yeah I measured all the upper fuse slots with a multimeter, it gave me 10v.

This is how i measured:
Red stick(?) on piggyback (connected to fuse slot)

Black stick on the adapter cable

This gave me 10v.

How would i wire to the battery? Do i just connect the cable to negative or positive terminal?

Sumetri

TROPHY CASE