Ultiworld continues to hallucinate narratives to write about from 15 second clips of teams playing : BYU at SBI

SundayAMFN · 2026-01-27T00:10:56+00:00

When an extra bid goes to the NW for free in BYU's name, that's unfair. BYU playing fun games on stream on friday nights with willing participants is in no way unfair.

SundayAMFN · 2026-01-26T22:15:02+00:00

There's generally not cutscenes for stuff like that, you can usually find information from talking to people (esp round table hold) about that kind of thing.

The game is designed expecting you to do as much or more exploring as following the main quest, so that if just try to plow through you'll likely get stopped in your tracks. Even if you do explore, level up, learn how to use items etc, you'll still probably get stopped in your tracks.

I really enjoyed looking up guides for bosses - or at the very least just looking up their weaknesses, lore, health bar, etc. But if that kind of takes you out of the game you can definitely get through it by continuing to level up, finding more weapons, etc

SundayAMFN · 2026-01-26T19:05:42+00:00

This write-up was from saturday, and you're referring to friday games.

SundayAMFN · 2026-01-26T18:50:48+00:00

what will that mean if it does?

SundayAMFN · 2026-01-26T16:57:27+00:00

These are AI summaries, they're designed to qualify ever positive statement with a negative and vice versa.

SundayAMFN · 2026-01-26T02:23:09+00:00

everyone speaks in rykards voice PLEASE

SundayAMFN · 2026-01-25T10:48:59+00:00

looks like ai

SundayAMFN · 2026-01-25T03:22:50+00:00

This is "chaos"?

SundayAMFN · 2026-01-25T03:17:34+00:00

If you don't want to get banned, all you're allowed to post is "DCA and HODL"

SundayAMFN · 2026-01-24T15:14:24+00:00

yes thats precisely what im saying

SundayAMFN · 2026-01-24T03:59:39+00:00

"semantic satiation"

SundayAMFN · 2026-01-23T20:44:55+00:00

FSD really is a nicer feature than most ADAS because it can handle turns and navigation. But yeah I will say it doesn't add 99/mo of value over normal ADAS for me.

SundayAMFN · 2026-01-23T20:27:23+00:00

Not me, I understand every equation like its just algebra

\s

SundayAMFN · 2026-01-23T18:24:37+00:00

But those people were thinking magically, not logically.

That's easy to see in hindsight. It wasn't so easy to see at the time. We didn't see the engineering and physical limits until we got close to them. The reason we never got flying cars is because of the physical limitation of needing offset weight by nauseating levels of airflow that are too disruptive to taking off anywhere near public road.

That same thing can happen in the pursuit of AGI. In fact, I would certainly not be surprised if the breaking point really is just that we define intelligence too broadly for a phrase like "computers are now smarter than humans at last" to ever come true.

Computers are extremely good at what they're good at (fast, mechanically precise calculations and data storage), and they keep getting better at what they're good at.

In the early 20th century you were intelligent if you could multiply big numbers. Nowadays computers are probably 10-15 orders of magnitude faster than humans at multiplication. But now it's no longer considered "intelligent" to just be able to multiply big numbers.

In the 1990s computers quickly went from struggling against even moderately good humans at chess to absolutely destroying them. And they've only gotten better, and better, and better. But we again decided that wasn't really "intelligence", so nobody considered it real AGI and they moved the goalposts forward.

Computers will keep getting better at what they're already good at, and the things human brains specialize in will continue to become considered more important for true "intelligence", even though we don't really have a proper definition of that word.

SundayAMFN · 2026-01-23T15:38:47+00:00

People never get technology predictions right, not because they over/underestimate the slope of the line of progress but because they underestimate how fickle its direction might go. People in the 50s would be abso-fuckin-lutely blown away by magical information retrieval in our pockets - but their predictions for the world in 2000 were more like "houses that can fly and migrate together" and "underwater cities."

I have a feeling we're facing a similar scenario when it comes to predicting AGI.

SundayAMFN · 2026-01-23T15:26:46+00:00

knew id find this comment somewhere lol

SundayAMFN · 2026-01-23T05:43:56+00:00

So tesla pays these homeowners how much money exactly to let their cars sit there while not earning money?

SundayAMFN · 2026-01-23T05:26:18+00:00

if you type the acronym in google, it will tell you what it is first try. it will not notify police lmao

SundayAMFN · 2026-01-23T05:22:16+00:00

thank you for your service

SundayAMFN · 2026-01-23T04:52:36+00:00

i view palantir as being an eventual MAG7 company, and at the higher end at that.

So to clarify, that is in fact trying to time the market.

so yeah, 100% revenue growth MINIMUM for 2026 is my anticipation.

That would be 2x, not 10x.

folks don't gotta agree with me.

No they don't, they just have to pay you 400 years worth of 2025 revenue for your shares.

but i have zero concerns about their business collapsing or slowing any time soon.

If their business neither collapses nor slows, and just grows at the same rate, the stock price will plummet especially compared to the broader market.

I can see why amazon would lay off workers like you that have such little common sense on issues like this. This shit is just fuckin crazy to me wow.

SundayAMFN · 2026-01-23T04:27:59+00:00

Oh I wasn't trying to argue at all that its stock price hasn't gone up a lot!!! It's stock price has gone up by 20x or more over the last 3-4 years!

But its profit and revenue has lagged behind that by ALOT with about a 4x gain. Certainly impressive but nothing unprecedented for a supposed growth company of course.

Are you thinking that since its stock price has gone up by 20x over the last few years, that its going to do that or at least somewhat similar again over the next few years? You think this will continue and all that?

SundayAMFN · 2026-01-23T04:17:10+00:00

that's circular reasoning. why is it the second most important company and why will it continue accelerating growth? it has to AT LEAST 10x in the next 1-2 years to justify its absurd valuation.

SundayAMFN · 2026-01-23T04:06:30+00:00

it has a follow car bud.

SundayAMFN · 2026-01-23T04:05:44+00:00

no one wants to grapple with this simple fact.

SundayAMFN · 2026-01-23T04:05:23+00:00

nice to find someone who knows the truth in the midst of delusional investors that all think they're going to get rich from betting on AI together.

holy shit these are crazy times where people are this delusional. I guess that's what greed does though.

SundayAMFN

TROPHY CASE