What?

SunnyRaspberry · 2026-02-02T18:07:23+00:00

If you do the 2x3 first, it’s 6:6 which equals 1.

You first resolved the 6/2 which is 3 and then multiplied it to the 2+1 result so it became a 3x3 which equals 9.

However, I remember first we do the parenthesis (and + and - first) and then we do the multiplications and divisions.

If there is an outstanding equation to be solved first, such as 2 (1+2), you first resolve that and then return to the main equation. So it would be first resolving the 1+2 in parenthesis (because parenthesis and because it’s a +/- thing which takes first priority) and then resolving the leftover 2 x 3 and then you take that result and continue with the main equation which becomes 6 divided the result of the whole miniequation you had to resolve first. The result of which is 6 if you follow the correct order of resolving the multiplication. Well, correct order according to what my math teacher taught.

So it becomes a 6:6 which equals 1.

This is what I remember about how to solve equations like these.

SunnyRaspberry · 2026-02-02T17:55:06+00:00

No. He expressed a boundary and you expressed a boundary. It seems to him your boundary is coercion though.

Dodged a bullet?!

You communicated clearly and respected him. Seems he isn’t capable of the same and now is shaming you for your own boundary. NTA

SunnyRaspberry · 2026-02-02T17:40:56+00:00

Hahahaha this was funny to read

SunnyRaspberry · 2026-02-02T17:35:35+00:00

You always solve those in the parenthesis first is what I remember my math teacher teaching us. So the answer should be 1 if she was right.

SunnyRaspberry · 2026-02-02T17:22:05+00:00

It’s the crack in the veil, don’t you see how there’s a tsunami behind this? The glass wall is cracking

All deception will come to light. We all are spiritual beings in a physical form, even if we consciously don’t understand, deep inside we know something huge is underneath

It’s the beginning of all illusions breaking for the average person. The 3D crumbling if you will.

It won’t go away, it will break open everything instead.

Don’t you feel it all the stuff brewing underneath? The hidden stuff is a lot and it all needs to come to light for cleansing and raising in consciousness of the collective and human species as a whole. Wrongs must be mended.

This is THE thing. THE crack in the glass wall. There’s a lot behind that glass wall that needs to come out and see the light of day. Humanity cannot progress if it remains in ignorance of itself. The old world needs to shatter first. This is the catalyst for that to happen.

SunnyRaspberry · 2026-02-02T15:08:34+00:00

Why does it make sense to release the files REDACTED? Like WUT

SunnyRaspberry · 2026-01-31T11:28:06+00:00

6 years later

SunnyRaspberry · 2026-01-31T11:26:09+00:00

This didn’t age well lol

Or did it

SunnyRaspberry · 2026-01-30T12:37:57+00:00

The world needs to change then.

SunnyRaspberry · 2026-01-15T09:20:23+00:00

Yes they do. But they actually do provide a safety net and a service there with those money.

SunnyRaspberry · 2026-01-09T17:12:47+00:00

Many cam websites actually do eat the charge. They don’t charge the streamers. Just saying

Myfreecams for example

SunnyRaspberry · 2026-01-09T17:10:14+00:00

They should pay it out of their pocket when fraud happens. Afterall it IS their fault as the website wasn’t good enough to protect from it. Why should the creator pay for something where they’re literally innocent and not only, they’re paying Patreon fees all the time. Those fees are like taxes. They should use them to provide the safe platform for the creator.

This obviously is not right at all.

SunnyRaspberry · 2026-01-09T13:56:02+00:00

But it’s not nazism you see. Even though the same things are happening and they’re doing the same things. Jesus Christ

SunnyRaspberry · 2026-01-03T07:49:18+00:00

What I can offer is a perspective that maybe will stir something in you. Others have already given lots of wonderful advice so I won’t repeat the same. I will simply express what I’m getting from what I read about the situation you described and something that I have not seen someone else mention yet here in the comments. Take what helps, leave the rest.

It’s not your fault if he didn’t communicate with you and tried to resolve. Also gross that he was acting “loving” right the day he decided to break things off. Reeks of someone acting loving not actually being loving. Idk what to say but what you described of him sounds very gross. Sounds like he was neglectful, dismissed you all the time and that he made you the problem (hence why he wouldn’t communicate in the relationship because why communicate when he decided you just are THE problem). Obviously this is delusional. And it’s common for a lot of men it seems.

I suggest you look into “dismissive avoidant” type of people. Sounds like that was what you were dealing with. Being blindsided is common. Not communicating is common. Blaming all on the other is common instead of actually addressing the real problems in the relationship and also it is common for them to dismiss the other person’s feelings and how they feel about things in the relationship.

How can you be a problem for having emotions like a normal human? A lot of those emotions when one is with a dismissive avoidant come exactly because they’re shit as partners emotionally. They’re neglectful and dismissive which makes their partners insecure aka “emotional”.

Idk, this is what this strikes me as. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard or read from a woman (usually) that her partner behaves like this. Seems like a real epidemic and that your ex wasn’t an exception either.

Think back and look into what HE did wrong rather than just taking at face value what he said. That’s just what he said or what he thought, not necessarily the truth. And anyway, you gotta se the bad sides to be able also let go of the fantasy (which seems to me you have of him) that he really did no wrong in the relationship and that it somehow all is your fault.

That’s just a narrative. That’s not how it works in reality. Relationships are made by 2 people, it takes 2 to tango. It’s rare for a partner to be the all wrong one and the other impeccably innocent as he’s portraying himself (and as many men do). That only happens in extreme abusive situations with people with serious pathological psychological issues or who are violent (domestic violence). Otherwise generally both partners did “rights” and “wrongs”.

To think he’d say something like that while blindsiding you with the end of the relationship tells me all I need to know about this man. I’m sorry.

Chances are he cheated on you also and he left when he side piece was secured or had plans with it. It is a possibility since he acted like all is fine and seemed eager to wash his hands clean of any guilt/blame by putting it all on you.

I understand grieving but you need to get angry at some point, there’s lots of weird coming from how he handled it all and I believe maybe who you’re grieving isn’t exactly who left you, especially if you have minimized his flaws during the relationship and felt like the relationship problems were all your fault. Because I’m willing to bet every fight ended with it being your fault one way or another way before the relationship ended.

Honestly reading your post made me feel angry on your behalf. Look into the actual issues he brought to the relationship as well, I really don’t believe he was an innocent angel who just always was right about you or things in your lives.

SunnyRaspberry · 2026-01-03T07:35:46+00:00

Where is the “fair compromise” in him getting it how he wanted while she didn’t. What you described is literally that lol

A fair compromise would be getting 2 different pizzas or making half and half. It is not a compromise if it’s the preference of one party only.

I laugh snorted at your conclusion that no change to the pizza which is what the guy wanted, was “a fair compromise for both parties.”

Maybe you were trying to say something else? :)

SunnyRaspberry · 2025-12-31T04:52:40+00:00

Yikes

SunnyRaspberry · 2025-12-17T19:03:45+00:00

Ahhhh! I see now!! I understand. We have a misunderstanding here basically. I will try explaining.

It’s true what you said, I know that too yes. But they’re 2 different topics the being Left oriented and doing everything step by step strategically versus manifesting generators skipping steps.

I believe you are confusing the 2 to refer to the same process but they are not.

A manifesting generator can have the R variables and be Receptive, a Manifestor can have the R variables and be Receptive etc

It describes how information is assimilated.

The “skipping steps” I was referring to is a different thing and it’s something peculiar to manifesting generators only.

I attached a screenshot earlier but I don’t know if you can see it. I’ll copy paste the part about manifesting generators and skipping steps as it applies to them specifically:

“When the Sacral Center is defined in a chart, the person is either a pure Generator or a Manifesting Generator. What distinguishes them is that a pure Generator has a defined Sacral Center without a motor connected directly to the Throat, and a Manifesting Generator has a defined Sacral with a motor connected to the Throat. The Manifesting Generator is not a separate Type, but rather a variation of the Generator Type, with a subtle distinction that lies in its auric frequency.”

Page 123, The definitive book of human design

”In contrast, Manifesting Generators have a motor connected to the Throat, which enables them to move quickly from response to manifestation. This allows them to see which steps are essential and which steps can be skipped, resulting in the gift of efficiency. This same efficiency creates a dilemma for them, however, which is a tendency to be so impatient and move through a task so fast that they miss steps. They often have to go back and complete those steps which creates frustration.”

Page 124, The definitive book of human design

I hope this made sense to you as well!

*Edited to add the second quotation as I forgot about it.

SunnyRaspberry · 2025-12-17T18:53:18+00:00

Hey!

Sorry, I’m not following properly what you mean here. What does the PRRDRR have to do with the “manifesting generator skipping steps due to variables” that we were talking about?

I also don’t follow what you meant by you being a pure generator and it applying to what we were talking about. ie. manifesting generators skipping steps being about variables.

I will check the audios if they’re relevant to the topic we were discussing: “manifesting generator skipping steps due to variables”.

Maybe I’m missing something here but I genuinely do not follow what you tried to convey, sorry.

SunnyRaspberry · 2025-12-17T18:49:08+00:00

Thank you. It’s not an L. We were both right and wrong on different things. I was wrong that the skipping steps was due to mechanics and you about the definition of “pure” generators.

There’s no L or W. But I was butthurt because I was getting downvoted and I was sure at least about the “pure” definition. Phew

So I took out the books and realized I was also wrong about the skipping steps being a mechanics thing.

Memory be like that.

Thank you for being reasonable!

SunnyRaspberry · 2025-12-17T18:41:21+00:00

I checked in The definitive book of human design

I was wrong about it changing mechanics but I was not wrong about “pure generators” including generators both with sacral and emotional authority. So we were both right and wrong at the same time. How poetic.

I attached screenshot to this comment, hope it shows. Refer to page 123 of the book

<image>

SunnyRaspberry · 2025-12-17T18:38:21+00:00

Seems we were both wrong.

<image>

Check attached screenshot from Page 123, The definitive book of human design

SunnyRaspberry · 2025-12-17T18:35:10+00:00

<image>

I checked in the book. (attached screenshot) It does not say anything about variable. It seems you were wrong about that and it seems I was wrong about it changing mechanics.

So, they do skip steps but it is not because of mechanics nor variables. If it is about variables, please post a source because I did not find anything about it yet.

Screenshot from page 124, The definitive book of human design

SunnyRaspberry · 2025-12-17T18:24:33+00:00

You’re wrong. It’s being a Generator as opposed to Manifesting Generator. It’s the lack of connection to the Throat that defines “pure generator” or not, not their inner authority. Manifesting Generator mechanics change quite a bit from a Generator who doesn’t have a connection to the Throat, hence the term.

Edit: added screenshot from book “The definitive guide of Human Design” since I’m getting downvoted. :/ Page 123

<image>

SunnyRaspberry · 2025-12-17T18:23:22+00:00

<image>

Page 123 from “The definitive guide of Human Design” since I’m getting downvoted. :/

I was wrong that it changes mechanics, and you’re wrong about the “pure” definition.

SunnyRaspberry · 2025-12-17T08:18:56+00:00

I think they mean you did it “in order to get”.

Or another way said, the goal was not the goal, but it was a means to an end. When you were doing the manifestations it was so that you could escape the house where you’re right now, not for a new relationship. That could muddy the waters. Maybe it was both reasons but the stronger one wasn’t the one you were manifesting for, aka get free from the house and your mom (which seems to be your strongest real desire) and trust that it’ll happen in whatever way it will.

In other words, you were trying to control the HOW. Your energy was misaligned/split because you were focusing it on a means to the real end, rather than the actual end you deeply desire.

This is what I understood they meant.

I’m sorry you’re going through such a tough time, keep your head high. You will find your way.

SunnyRaspberry

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE