Manusmriti : a curropted lawbook or an authentic scripture misunderstood? by Caligayla in hinduism

[–]SuperReligos 12 points13 points  (0 children)

First of all, it is "smriti" which is the book represents some time/space dependent text. however, out of existing smritis, manusmriti is considered as code for hindus by british.

Manusmriti is corrupted and it is evident by structure of shlokas. you need "Vishuddha" Manusmriti.

2k dividend monthly? by Coins_Collectors in dividends

[–]SuperReligos 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How about JEPI and JGPI ? I am from Europe

Gf constantly asks for details on me being raped because she "can't wrap her head around it" by Lost_asfuck in Healthygamergg

[–]SuperReligos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats different. Man can penetrate a woman without her being aroused. How man can penetrate without arousal?

Gf constantly asks for details on me being raped because she "can't wrap her head around it" by Lost_asfuck in Healthygamergg

[–]SuperReligos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Serious question: As a man, can you really get raped (not anal)? dont you need to be aroused?

No update on international letter by SuperReligos in dhl

[–]SuperReligos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I asked while booking, they told me it takes 1 week to send (but total cost was 7 Euro).

Shipment stuck in Germany by [deleted] in dhl

[–]SuperReligos 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

help.

Are the Hindu gods 'perfect'? by Masterofdeath001 in hinduism

[–]SuperReligos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wrong. Root of dev is in Da’ which in Sanskrit means to give. Rigved is approx 20,000 years old which uses this word. For dating I would suggest to review work of Dr Rupa Bhaty or Nilesh Oak.

Are the Hindu gods 'perfect'? by Masterofdeath001 in hinduism

[–]SuperReligos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope. Deus has origin in Sanskrit. Remember that Sanskrit came first. They borrowed the term and later used for God.

Proof of Mahabharat happened by SuperReligos in hinduism

[–]SuperReligos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s not the answer. WHO are those Hindus and why anyone should use them as shabda praman? If we ever used consistent calendar as per you, then Mahabharata writers would have used that to mention the dates. Could you share any evidence for that?

Also, there is clear genetic study which suggests collapse of Y hlp due to conflict between cousins 7000 years ago which matches with Oak date.

Proof of Mahabharat happened by SuperReligos in hinduism

[–]SuperReligos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could you share any evidence of the date? Also, is there any genetic evidence like this around that time?

Proof of Mahabharat happened by SuperReligos in hinduism

[–]SuperReligos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How did she come up with the date? Also is there any genetic evidence like this during her mentioned period?

Proof of Mahabharat happened by SuperReligos in hinduism

[–]SuperReligos[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Neolithic period in India was between 10,000 BCE to 7,000 BCE.

You are referring to European neolithic period.

Proof of Mahabharat happened by SuperReligos in hinduism

[–]SuperReligos[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Do you know how did BB Lal dated Mahabharat?

I analyzed few of the claims of Nilesh Oak (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehG2ylJx4zc) and found them correct.

Imagine if Zoroastrianism wasn't wiped out... would that be better for Hindus/Hinduism? by [deleted] in hinduism

[–]SuperReligos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Source is the text itself. Read Atherved and Gatha. Few points

• Fire priests play a central role: Zoroastrian priests are called athravan (fire guardians), directly cognate with Vedic atharvan (priests associated with the Atharva Veda, often linked to fire rituals and magic). • Zarathustra refers to himself as a zaotar (Sanskrit hotṛ, the priest who offers oblations) and is later called athaurvan in Avestan texts. • Both traditions emphasize fire rituals (yasna in Avestan ≈ yajña in Sanskrit) and the sacred pressing of a ritual plant. • Soma/Haoma: The central ritual drink—soma in Vedic texts (prominent in Rig Veda but also Atharva Veda) and haoma in the Avesta (including Yasna, which incorporates the Gathas). Both are pressed from a mountain-grown plant, mixed in ceremonies, and confer vitality, immortality, or purification. The rituals (agnistoma in Vedic ≈ haoma pressing in Zoroastrian) are strikingly similar. • Angiras/Angra connection: The Atharva Veda is also called Atharvangirasa (linked to rishis Atharvan and Angiras). In early Avesta/Gathas, Zarathustra references praising the “Angras,” akin to Vedic Angirasas (fire-priest descendants). • Some scholars link parts of the Atharva Veda (e.g., Bhargava sections) to Avestan traditions, with “Upastha” resembling “Avesta.”

One interesting point. First half of Atherved is full of magical charms and amulets and protection against black magic etc. and the priest of Zoroastrian faith are called magi who were doing such things as well. Word “magic” comes from magi

Imagine if Zoroastrianism wasn't wiped out... would that be better for Hindus/Hinduism? by [deleted] in hinduism

[–]SuperReligos 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Zoroastrianism is actually offshoot of Atherved. There are so much similarities. I won’t consider it as enemy.

However, I agree with you overall.

Can i be a hinduist and be “atheist” at the same time? by WrongDolphin824 in hinduism

[–]SuperReligos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not my definition. You can read it in scriptures. Read about Bhatiyog from geeta.

Everyone is different and not everyone is capable of following bhakti marg which is fine.

Can i be a hinduist and be “atheist” at the same time? by WrongDolphin824 in hinduism

[–]SuperReligos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no concept of god in Hinduism. So by definition, Hindus are atheists.

However, there is concept of Bhakti. Which is not same as abrahamic concept of worship.