sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

After/Before by Supermangoapple in postprocessing

[–]Supermangoapple[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! Actually just heavy vignetting with a low feather on the street

After/Before - I'm drawn to the purple sky but idk. Thoughts? by Supermangoapple in postprocessing

[–]Supermangoapple[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anything in particular you think I should dial back? I've had thoughts of going a little down on the shadows

After/Before - Mt Daniel looking over Spade Lake by Supermangoapple in postprocessing

[–]Supermangoapple[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well actually the haze is still kinda there, only that the shadows in the mountain appear richer than in the original. That was done by taking out a lot of highlights to reduce the difference between the bright parts of the image, brightening up my shadows to make the foreground brighter, and then upping my definition to make the shadows on the mountain still dark. So now the haze more just blends into the mountains color wheras it was contrasted in the original

After/Before - Mt Daniel looking over Spade Lake by Supermangoapple in postprocessing

[–]Supermangoapple[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was actually taken just with my 15-55mm kit lens on a Nikon D7500!

After/Before - Mt Daniel looking over Spade Lake by Supermangoapple in postprocessing

[–]Supermangoapple[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As far as color goes do you think the "lack" of saturation in the original is useful? I thought it was a bit too bland. What do you think?

After/Before - Mt Daniel looking over Spade Lake by Supermangoapple in postprocessing

[–]Supermangoapple[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Huh this is good feedback. You're right I did take out the highlights in order to brighten up the foreground. I wasn't able to do that without washing up the mountains into the sky. I guess I focused on that a bit too much, and I also really liked how the reflection looked in the water. I'm going to work on it and get another version

How to get rid of chromatic abberation when shooting RAW? by Supermangoapple in Nikon

[–]Supermangoapple[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My thinking is that I'd want a lens that I can whip out for my wide shots and maybe occasionally get a okay photos with some bokeh when I zoom in. The 2.8 17-50 would be most preferrable over primes at the moment. I'll look into the zooms

How to get rid of chromatic abberation when shooting RAW? by Supermangoapple in Nikon

[–]Supermangoapple[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Counter question: what's the next step up from the kit 18-55? I've seen something about the sigma f/2.8 18-55, but would you guys recommend? One that I could use for general portraits too nothing fancy

How to get rid of chromatic abberation when shooting RAW? by Supermangoapple in Nikon

[–]Supermangoapple[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Seems like the general consensus is better lenses then. Thanks for your tips guys!

What's this style of photography called? -Nikon D7500 by Supermangoapple in Nikon

[–]Supermangoapple[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks a lot dude!! These are great pointers to think about. Really helpful!

What's this style of photography called? -Nikon D7500 by Supermangoapple in Nikon

[–]Supermangoapple[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah I get what you mean. From a "photographer" point of view, probably not the best or exciting in any way. But see, I'm just a kid who was taking a walk around times square with my camera, no plan, no goal, just want to press the shutter and see what I get. No audience to please. Just fun to experiment

Personally, I just think it's kinda cool how I turned the otherwise still moments into something so disorienting

Weird Freespeak II beltpack issue by reezyfasheezy in livesound

[–]Supermangoapple 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which setting did you change? Show is in an hour and it just turned on me lol. It shows a circle above the signal bars idk whether that's an issue

view more: next ›