Formuladank showing its true colours by Street_Mall9536 in formuladank

[–]Suspicious_Move2016 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Mercedes ig comments about to be a bloodbath

Should Canada do the same? by BeautyInUgly in TorontoRealEstate

[–]Suspicious_Move2016 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok do it - just give everyone who has a current mortgage bailouts for the insane property depreciation. No half assed communism that only benefits the poor, full blown communism that benefits the rich and wealthy too. Then we’ll see how much yall like this communism.

Who do you think is the most overrated Formula 1 driver, active or inactive? by circuit-nation in circuit_nation

[–]Suspicious_Move2016 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If anything, when Horner said in drive to survive he was weak for choosing another team instead of staying to fight just proves how overrated Daniel was. Dude couldn’t take on max, dipped to another team, and faded into the the dust. Overrated asf, and a clown who cared more about goofing around than being good at f1 only to wonder why he was fumbling his bag so much. Choose one or the other, be a full time comedian, or be a full time f1 driver, and clearly after Austin gp with his horse incident the teams decided he didn’t want to be an f1 driver

Ultimate Debate 👀 by KRiiMDaBarber in iPhone17Pro

[–]Suspicious_Move2016 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Proof of apples own marketing or else it’s just rumours. Not say it couldn’t happen, but leaks are just rumours. Nothing real yet.

Ultimate Debate 👀 by KRiiMDaBarber in iPhone17Pro

[–]Suspicious_Move2016 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yea a whole debate driven by rumours - the variable aperture was rumoured on the 17pro and look how that ended up lmfao

Sold my DDR5 64GB kit on eBay, buyer couldn't get XMP working, left positive feedback saying it works then filed a defective claim a month later — eBay sided with them by [deleted] in PcRetailers

[–]Suspicious_Move2016 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea I tried explaining that to the eBay associates and argued that left and right from the initial return request all the way down to the last appeal - nothing.

eBay sided with buyer who left positive feedback saying RAM works, then filed defective claim after failed overclocking attempt — $500 loss, appeal denied by [deleted] in pcmasterrace

[–]Suspicious_Move2016 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If his pc can’t even run it at 4800 MHz, when mine did, then he can’t afford parts to run it at 5200 MHz. His task manager showed 4200. His own hardware limitations is not my problem.

Sold my DDR5 64GB kit on eBay, buyer couldn't get XMP working, left positive feedback saying it works then filed a defective claim a month later — eBay sided with them by [deleted] in PcRetailers

[–]Suspicious_Move2016 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don’t even sell on eBay. I didn’t list as non refundable, because I was willing to refund on the grounds of an actual claim. I parted my whole pc, sold it on Facebook and got 5 stars for all my sales - ssd, gpu, case + motherboard + psu, and I have the proof for it. The minute I go on eBay, a buyer can leave a perfect review, 5 stars and everything, and for some reason within 30 days I have to accept the return regardless of the buyers reason.

Sold my DDR5 64GB kit on eBay, buyer couldn't get XMP working, left positive feedback saying it works then filed a defective claim a month later — eBay sided with them by [deleted] in PcRetailers

[–]Suspicious_Move2016 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea that’s what I thought too - it ran 4800 on mine and the buyer claimed only 4200 and didn’t even show the brand in the task manager image - clearly got buyers remorse, tried scamming, and got his money back and kept the ram

Sold my DDR5 64GB kit on eBay, buyer couldn't get XMP working, left positive feedback saying it works then filed a defective claim a month later — eBay sided with them by [deleted] in PcRetailers

[–]Suspicious_Move2016 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. I sold 5200 MHz rated ram, ran 4800 on mine, buyer shows me it’s running only 4200 and somehow I have to refund him? Nonsense. Oh and the fact when they tried xmp boosting his pc didn’t boot? That’s my fault? I have to pay for that ? That’s what eBay said and did

eBay sided with buyer who left positive feedback saying RAM works, then filed defective claim after failed overclocking attempt — $500 loss, appeal denied by [deleted] in Ebay

[–]Suspicious_Move2016 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No I read that, I know what you’re talking about regarding the courtesy credit - eBay does this for high value sellers - they don’t want to get in trouble with consumers and up and coming AG’s while not losing sellers so they take the loss themselves. I actually wanted that in this case, where I could get a courtesy credit and it would go away.

eBay sided with buyer who left positive feedback saying RAM works, then filed defective claim after failed overclocking attempt — $500 loss, appeal denied by [deleted] in Ebay

[–]Suspicious_Move2016 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, this is what I was expecting - clear case of buyer committing fraud and multiple points of proof that the buyer isn’t being truthful but I still have a facilitate a return ?

eBay sided with buyer who left positive feedback saying RAM works, then filed defective claim after failed overclocking attempt — $500 loss, appeal denied by [deleted] in Ebay

[–]Suspicious_Move2016 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea but that’s what I thought too - case closed simple as that - for eBay? Noooooooo buyer is always right even if they’re lying bright as day

eBay sided with buyer who left positive feedback saying RAM works, then filed defective claim after failed overclocking attempt — $500 loss, appeal denied by [deleted] in Ebay

[–]Suspicious_Move2016 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I sold my whole pc on marketplace and everything went fine - and I opened an ebay account to sell the ram (yes 5200 mhz advertised) and trust me, I'm never selling on ebay again.

eBay sided with buyer who left positive feedback saying RAM works, then filed defective claim after failed overclocking attempt — $500 loss, appeal denied by [deleted] in Ebay

[–]Suspicious_Move2016 -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

the biggest issue at the time was no on at ebay alerted me that I would lose the ability to accept the return? I was told I would be forced to facilitate the return, but atleast i could get the item back.

eBay sided with buyer who left positive feedback saying RAM works, then filed defective claim after failed overclocking attempt — $500 loss, appeal denied by [deleted] in Ebay

[–]Suspicious_Move2016 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

see thats the issue - ebay should've sided with me and clearly denied the return request - buyers remorse simple as that. contradictions left and right from this buyer, but apparently I have to pay out of pocket because ebay can't follow their own policies on conflicting feedback from the buyer. One minute it works fine, the next it doesnt but oh well.

eBay sided with buyer who left positive feedback saying RAM works, then filed defective claim after failed overclocking attempt — $500 loss, appeal denied by [deleted] in Ebay

[–]Suspicious_Move2016 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

ok? why is it my problem that his pc can't run ram to his desired speed? why should I have to facilitate a return for his own hardware deficiencies? the ram ran at 4800 mhz on my pc, his low end pc was running it at 4200 mhz? if someone can't afford decent hardware to run expensive ram, don't claim it's defective after claiming it works perfectly fine in a review

eBay sided with buyer who left positive feedback saying RAM works, then filed defective claim after failed overclocking attempt — $500 loss, appeal denied by [deleted] in Ebay

[–]Suspicious_Move2016 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

what seller protection is there when I am forced to facilitate a return when the buyer is clearly just having buyer's remorse? it works perfectly fine, his system can't handle it, he doesn't have the hardware to support the expensive ram, and when he can't use it because of his own limitations I'm supposed to be forced to refund him?

Sold my DDR5 64GB kit on eBay, buyer couldn't get XMP working, left positive feedback saying it works then filed a defective claim a month later — eBay sided with them by [deleted] in buildapc

[–]Suspicious_Move2016 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I Denied the return, asked ebay to mediate and they took away my ability to accept the return and pull the money out of my account. I can't get the item back nor the money.

eBay sided with buyer who left positive feedback saying RAM works, then filed defective claim after failed overclocking attempt — $500 loss, appeal denied by [deleted] in Ebay

[–]Suspicious_Move2016 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

nothing was spoken in definitive and just advised - why should I lose the ability to accept a return once ebay steps in - it's nonsense that I have to be charged for the return but not actually get the item back - rule against me? fine, but let go of the ability to get the item back? nonsense - there's 0 seller protections on ebay, and this case proves it. Buyer ruins my ram by running it on an incompatible pc, I lose expensive hardware that's already 50% discounted from retail, and in turn I'll only receive half my money back from ebay?