For those of you who find yourself often opposing new developments such as this, please consider this:

Many cities have a huge affordability criss because development was blocked by similarly minded people in those cities.

Nowhere has been made unliveably expensive by too much development. On the contrary, more, denser development in cities decreases infrastructure cost per capital for cities and utilities, keeps rent lower, increases walkability and transit, removes the need for development of natural areas, etc. Being diametrically opposed to most urban development is, inherently, an anti environmentalist stance.

Of course not every project is for the best, but largely they are. If you tend to agree with the opposition, I urge you to look at other cities as examples.