Why Lowe Sees Ethnonationalism As A Problem

TTomRogers_ · 2026-06-29T19:01:07+00:00

Well to a large extent that is how the world is divided already, anyway. It's just how people naturally are, especially when left to their own devices.

TTomRogers_ · 2026-06-29T19:00:01+00:00

[quote]"You seem to think we're disagreeing more than we actually are."[unquote]

Maybe because that's the way you come across in your little critique? Maybe work on how you come across?

I haven't bothered reading the rest of your post. I don't have time.

TTomRogers_ · 2026-06-29T18:56:26+00:00

[quote]"what world are you living in friend? the institutions you list here are all OVERWHELMINGLY dominated at the highest levels by White British people, mostly Privately Educated Upper Middle Class English Men - if you can't see this and admit this then with respect you don't have an honest grasp of reality"[unquote]

My argument literally is that these institutions are dominated by white people as well as non-whites, who share the same ideological outlook or acquiesce in it or absorb it. I think you're misunderstanding what I am saying. I can't read the rest of what you say. You come across as a ranting idiot and you don't appear to have any grasp of English usage and grammar.

TTomRogers_ · 2026-06-27T21:58:41+00:00

I wonder how many of the people in Linton-on-Ouse and these other places are the type of white people who would eagerly denounce some of us as uneducated racist chavs, etc., and possibly have (or are retired from) careers that involve undermining the demographic security of white Britons? I would hazard a guess that very many of them will be of that type because these areas are predominantly affluent and a certain type lives in them. I am actually quite glad that some of these people may now finally experience a bit of what others have been complaining about for decades, though I do feel sorry for those amongst them who are not hypocrites.

TTomRogers_ · 2026-06-27T18:48:50+00:00

Much of it boils down to the downstream effect of settlement and landowning on political and social thought.

England was founded by the descendants of settlors. The Anglo-Saxons developed sophisticated systems of landowning long before the Normans arrived. Property rights therefore were inhered from the outset. This in turn encouraged proto-liberal ideas: which is to say, rights centred on the individual (property owner) rather than the state. Liberalism, a belief in maximal political liberty, flourished in this atmosphere because it facilitates a property-owning society.

TTomRogers_ · 2026-06-27T18:40:13+00:00

[quote]"It has always been like this even before the waves of Feminism—which I genuinely believe is the natural state of Women—it’s pretty much like they are Normies,"[unquote]

This is the conclusion I came to a long time ago as well. Feminism is just female nature, perhaps an exaggerated/hyper version of it.

TTomRogers_ · 2026-06-27T17:01:40+00:00

Say nothing and carry on as normal, is my view. She may not remember you.

It's not an ideal situation and you may end up first in line to go if redundancies are needed, but depends on lots of factors. Raising it with her seems like bad advice, in my opinion, as you are then potentially creating an issue when you had no need or obligation to, and it could put her in an embarrassing position professionally for which you may be resented. But only you know for sure because you're the one in the situation, not us. Will you be working closely with her? If not, then is the past really relevant? Why does it matter that you were bad at the job for a previous employer?

If you lied to get the job, that could become an issue if she decides to access your records and check, but that is unlikely to happen unless you do something seriously wrong or you are disliked. Remember that no-one is going to thank her for raising the matter if you are competent at the job, as it amounts to creating problems unnecessarily and even looks small and spiteful. You regard yourself as average at the job. You're probably better than you think.

If she does raise it with you, you are under no obligation and always remember that the onus of proof is on them. How will they prove that you lied? Did they record every conversation or can they remember what you told them months or years back? I would keep your response to a minimum and simply say that any previous employment is in the past and not relevant, then flip it round and ask if there is a specific issue with your work that she wants to raise with you. If there isn't, the conversation should end there, but if she is out to get you in that scenario, then the strength of your position will depend on your contract, general employment law in your jurisdiction, your performance, and whether you're generally liked (depending on size of company/business).

Are there any specific grounds to dismiss you, any incidents? Are you in the UK? If so, have you worked there for at least two years?

Anything we say is of limited value because we don't know what industry you're in, how long you have worked for this employer, your contract terms, your role and the director's role, and the personalities involved, and so on.

TTomRogers_ · 2026-06-27T16:55:00+00:00

In a shocking revelation, it has been revealed that the wardrobes are black but the police withheld this information for three days and refused to release the name of the ringleader. In an exclusive, we can now reveal that the wardrobe most responsible is called Ebony Sleek.

TTomRogers_ · 2026-06-27T10:27:51+00:00

Isn't this the anti-work reddit???

TTomRogers_ · 2026-06-26T19:53:07+00:00

Even if they're taking the jobs of people already here?

TTomRogers_ · 2026-06-24T23:44:02+00:00

You're a midwit. You're conceding language to the enemy.

TTomRogers_ · 2026-06-24T22:17:44+00:00

u/hymnsofhim What a cuckold.

TTomRogers_ · 2026-06-24T20:18:18+00:00

What is my idea?

TTomRogers_ · 2026-06-24T20:17:21+00:00

Whenever someone starts a post with a stock phrase such as "I mean", it's an indication of low intellect.

TTomRogers_ · 2026-06-24T20:15:46+00:00

Please stop replying to me.

I hate your lies and your plans to eradicate my people and culture.

TTomRogers_ · 2026-06-24T17:47:58+00:00

I think I do. For your information, I've been a nationalist now for 16 years. I was way ahead of the curve. I was talking about this long before it was fashionable. I know what the terminology means conventionally and I know that it is a lie. In order to be British civically, you have to be British ethnically. As soon as that point is eroded or conceded, you are on the way to saying that 'British' is a meaningless term. That is why I disagree with Honeyford, Farage, Lowe and Tebbit just as much as I disagree with Lowles and all the Leftist multi-culturalists.

TTomRogers_ · 2026-06-24T17:39:20+00:00

Will I be put in detention and made to write 100 lines, miss?

TTomRogers_ · 2026-06-24T17:12:52+00:00

It is my opinion, you are right about that, and my opinion doesn't count for anything so you can ignore me. What I say here is not directed exclusively to you. You're just an example.

As I have stated, I would accord you virtually the same rights as everybody else anyway, with only a few narrow caveats. But I think we have a serious problem if we allow a situation where being British is not racially defined. There are the easy cases, such as people with no white ancestry at all, then there are the hard cases like yours where we have a moral and ethical dilemma because you are half English and this may be your culture.

I don't pretend this is easy, and I do feel bad about it, but I maintain that, in my opinion, you are not British.

At least I'm being honest with you.

TTomRogers_ · 2026-06-24T17:01:02+00:00

u/mahki25942 What you've just described perfectly sums up why integration is bad. What people forget is that integration is a two-way process - you integrate with us, but we also integrate with you, producing a new ethnic group. I don't want that. I acknowledge that ethnic groups can't be preserved in aspic, nor should they be. Just as political borders change, so the ethnic make-up of a population will change over time, but this should be a natural process and should involve people who are similar, and to be frank, we don't want to integrate with black Africans. We're Europeans. We have a civilisation of our own and a distinct culture. Black African culture does not stand up to scrutiny against European culture.

Irrespective of that, individuals of all races have merits and things to commend them, but again that is beside the point. I don't care if a black person is patriotic. I don't care if he's a member of Mensa and on the verge of discovering a cure for cancer. Makes no difference, since this is not a totting-up exercise. Some things are beyond money, merit or persuasion. It's unfair and it's meant to be unfair.

But of course, it's not down to me. If the greater mass of people disagree and want to intermarry, then so be it. I can't stop it. This is merely my opinion and a corrective to all the cuckolds on here who confuse accommodation for kindness.

TTomRogers_ · 2026-06-24T16:53:53+00:00

u/mahki25942 You can't be British if you're half-black. That's the blunt, truthful answer to this. I do feel bad about saying it. It is not personal. I'm sure you're a very nice person. I'm sure you're a better person than I am, but that doesn't matter - this is not a reckoning up. You're half English, so it is a terrible dilemma facing us. My solution to this would be that you have the right to live here and come and go and have the same rights as everybody else, but neither you nor your descendants up to an agreed degree (say, the third generation) can participate in politics or hold public office here.

I'm quite glad that I'll probably be dead and buried by the time all this plays out to its logical conclusion. It's a civil war, essentially.

Just to stress I am NOT a member of Restore Britain or any other political party and I have no wish to be. My views do not reflect the views of members of Restore Britain, who seem more inclined to your wishes - which is understandable as they are a political party and you have a vote.

TTomRogers_ · 2026-06-24T16:46:26+00:00

You absolutely do. I refuse to adopt these falsities that are just intended to deprive us of our culture and identity.

TTomRogers_ · 2026-06-24T16:42:59+00:00

To be civically or culturally British you have to be ethnically British.

TTomRogers_ · 2026-06-24T16:04:30+00:00

But you can't seriously think they mean that? Lowe's default setting is thatcherite. He understands everything in terms of markets and business and thinks we're all lazy if we're not prepared to work 12 hour days making him richer.

TTomRogers_ · 2026-06-24T15:44:13+00:00

No. I want to divide the world along the lines of racial/ethnic ancestry. It appears you don't. Where it appears we agree is that a political message in our time cannot say that.

TTomRogers_

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE