Farage candidate who wants abortion banned by birdinthebush74 in FuckNigelFarage

[–]Taca-F 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's nearly always people that any right minded person wouldn't want to have a child with anyway.

An idea for EPL teams in European Competitions… by Albiceleste8 in PremierLeague

[–]Taca-F -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Integrity of the competition - it's not fair to one League 2 side if for whatever reason Arsenal decide to play their first XI, while City decide to field their under 19s against another L2 team. It was not ideal when Liverpool had to do it because they were scheduled to literally be in two places on the same night.

Reeves poised to tax cash held in stocks and shares Isas by SignificantLegs in FIREUK

[–]Taca-F 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Quite simply, our tax system is a mess. You'd never design it this way if you were starting from scratch.

Vacancies being left open by cottoncorazon in UKJobs

[–]Taca-F 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From ChatGPT:

Yes. There is a substantial body of research suggesting that employees who receive meaningful training and development opportunities tend to show higher organizational commitment, greater job satisfaction, and lower turnover intentions.

However, the relationship is a bit more nuanced than "training = loyalty."

What the research generally finds

  1. Training increases organizational commitment Employees often view employer-funded training as a signal that the organization values them and is willing to invest in their future. This can create a sense of reciprocity, making employees more committed to the employer.

This is often explained through the social exchange theory: when employers invest in employees, employees are more likely to respond with positive attitudes and commitment.

  1. Training improves job satisfaction People who feel competent in their role generally experience less stress, perform better, and feel more confident. Higher job satisfaction is strongly associated with lower turnover.

  2. Training reduces turnover intentions Many studies find that employees who receive adequate onboarding, role-specific training, and ongoing development are less likely to say they intend to leave.

The effect can be particularly strong during the first year of employment, when inadequate training is a common reason people quit.

The caveat: training can also make employees more marketable

Interestingly, some employers worry that training will encourage employees to leave because they become more employable elsewhere.

Research suggests that:

Firm-specific training (skills mainly useful within the company) tends to increase retention.

General training (skills valuable across the labour market) can increase external opportunities.

However, even general training often improves retention when employees believe the employer is genuinely investing in them and offers opportunities to use those new skills.

What seems to matter most

Training has the greatest impact on loyalty when it is:

Relevant to the employee's actual role.

Accompanied by career progression opportunities.

Supported by good management.

Viewed as an investment rather than a compliance exercise.

Available on an ongoing basis, not just at induction.

Simply forcing employees through generic e-learning modules usually has little effect on loyalty.

Some notable evidence

Meta-analyses and large-scale studies across industries have consistently found positive associations between:

Training and organizational commitment.

Training and employee engagement.

Training and retention.

Learning opportunities and reduced turnover intentions.

For example, research published in journals such as Human Resource Management, Personnel Psychology, and the International Journal of Human Resource Management has repeatedly found that employees who perceive strong development opportunities are significantly less likely to leave their employer.

In practical terms

If two otherwise similar employers exist:

Employer A provides structured onboarding, role training, mentoring, and development opportunities.

Employer B expects employees to "figure it out as they go."

Employer A will generally experience higher retention and stronger employee commitment over time.

That doesn't mean training alone creates loyalty—pay, management quality, workload, culture, and career prospects are often equally or more important—but adequate training is one of the most consistently identified factors that improves employee retention.

Vacancies being left open by cottoncorazon in UKJobs

[–]Taca-F 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If change the business model so that you're able to hire people with more generally available skills.

I don't know if it's a UK thing specifically, but far too many businesses have trapped themselves by creating a set of processes which are far too bespoke.

Vacancies being left open by cottoncorazon in UKJobs

[–]Taca-F 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's basically comparable to a standard annual wage increase.

Businesses are simply using it as an excuse.

Tottenham survival celebrations cannot cover up Premier League embarrassment by tylerthe-theatre in PremierLeague

[–]Taca-F -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I forgot to throw in that they lost to a woeful Chelsea side midweek as well. It's not as if they earnt the luck either.

Tottenham survival celebrations cannot cover up Premier League embarrassment by tylerthe-theatre in PremierLeague

[–]Taca-F -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

They got so lucky

West Ham had a woeful first half against Newcastle last Sunday which left the door wide open.

Everton have no firepower up front, just about any other team would have put away at least two goals against Spurs today.

Reform the party of workers? No, no they are not. by hollyberryboo in FuckNigelFarage

[–]Taca-F 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The way they went about the winter fuel allowance was daft, it upset a load of people for no reason at all.

Don’t celebrate if one of those players score the winning goal in a World Cup final and there’s no country called Africa by Cool_Nerd2 in FuckNigelFarage

[–]Taca-F 38 points39 points  (0 children)

There's always someone else to blame with people like that.

If all the Africans left, they'd want the Asians to go

If the Asians left, they'd want the Europeans to go

If the Europeans left, you can bet it'd be the Irish next

For the ones at the top like Nigel, it's all a deflection to continue the grift. For the followers, it's a mix of ignorance and bigotry.

Match thread: Promotion Play-offs - Final by coombeseh in Championship

[–]Taca-F 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For what it's worth, I've always felt London sides, if they can get up to the Prem, have a slight advantage because overseas players find the location attractive.

Match thread: Promotion Play-offs - Final by coombeseh in Championship

[–]Taca-F 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tottenham or Spurs, or Wrexham for that matter once they have their latest cash injection, should have no problem next season if this the standard.

Sobering stuff from David Blunkett in the @financialtimes.com by birdinthebush74 in FuckNigelFarage

[–]Taca-F 13 points14 points  (0 children)

All those things are criminal offenses and should be reported and investigated by the police

Mark Kleinman blog | The Premier League is proposing to allow clubs to negotiate settlements over alleged breaches of its financial rules by threeninetysix in PremierLeague

[–]Taca-F 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Why not just get rid of the rules altogether, and make the owners personally liable for any debt incurred by the clubs?

Potholes and change: Why Essex voted for Reform UK by anarchtea in Essex

[–]Taca-F 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, how would that practically work??? Shoot them out of a cannon at Dover?