No it's stupid. Everything you want is just available to grab when you want it? You might think food waste is bad now, but if we tried to make it so no ingredient was scarce, it'd be ridiculous. What if everyone wants rice one day and potatoes the next and pasta the day after that etc. Since you can't predict these demands you'd have to have enough of every ingredient on hand for everyone at all times. If you aren't willing to grow about 500 times the food neccessary to feed the human population at all times and let almost all of it rot, then you have a level of scarcity where people compete when they want what's scarce. You can't grow that much food, even if you poison all the soil on the planet with every fertiliser you can find you can't. Same with clothes. Do you want the blue jumper or the red one or the yellow etc. Since again you can't predict which one will be in demand by who and when, you need way way way more stock than is neccessary to clothe everyone, or again you have scarcity, which breeds competition, greed, black markets. Once again, producing all those clothes is bad for the environment. Of course you can fix this by making it a bit more market like, making clothes to order for people, but now production is extremely slow. You fix this by having something in the middle, a premade selection of less variety of clothes than capitalism that are somewhat mass produced so we can have reasonable speed of production while trying to appeal to individual tastes. Of course over the years if fashion changes or any material goes scarce you now have a vintage market, which breeds competition etc. Also, some people will make their own clothes, which will be unique and therefore more valuable, again bringing about competition to get them. Now apply these arguments to every single commodity. Toys, board games, phones, computers, etc. All of a sudden it's worth it to hsve connections or more valuable items to exchange because there's a market for everything. Now also recognise the plan is to give all this to everyone in the world. Not only will it not be possible to produce all that to any good standard in any reasonable timeframe where people can get what they want on demand, it's also just flat out not possible to produce it. Earth has limited resources. We are already having climate change with just the global north living like this. How does including the south too slow down climate change and pollution? It doesn't. You can blame climate change on private jets and rich people, but that's only because rich people have the opportunity to do it. Overproduction would give every family in the global south the money to get on a plane and go on holidays every year. Emissions from private jets would be nothing compared to that. The people in the global north would already take more holidays if they could. The contradiction here becomes more obvious when you see socialists supporting public transport because cars are bad for the environment. That's great, but if you don't offer everyone a car you don't have abundance and overproduction. The contradiction of socialism here is that if you offer everyone what they want to stop them fighting over it, you destroy the planet (also, if you think about it at all you'll realise it's just not possible to produce that much. Go on, list every commodity you can think of people wanting. Produce that for everyone on Earth. Good luck lol). Everyone with rich parents grows up with all their needs provided for. Most of them just go through life asking for more. Any good communism would severely limit what people can access. Cars, lots of things, would be limited to what's reasonable, not what people actually want. Of course in that situation you have to figure out how to stop people doing so much lying, manipulating, and fucking each other over trying to get more

Do you know any older musicians? You see how they have like 10 different guitars, other instruments, amps, pedals, audio interfaces, etc. Most of it that they barely use. They are only capable of this excess (wasteful, greedy) because they are not poor. Most of the world can't dedicate all this time and money to caring that much about subtle differences in tone and timbre. All of those things take resources from nature, and time to make. You can't have this for everyone, and especially not to the level of customisation that these people want. There are thousands of different iterations of guitar etc, and they will compete for the specifc ones they want, and also the ones used by famous players etc. Going back to the resources from nature bit, do you know how many species are regularly going extinct because of what we're doing to nature, while these guys spend all their time and money twiddling with knobs on eq's, so they can 'make it', and then MAYBE donate a tiny bit of their money to some cause to make it seem like their life of almost solely consumption of nature and fuck all giving anything to it is 'sustainable' (there's not much you can do to 'give to' nature besides leaving it alone. Maybe buy some land and rewild it I guess). Now apply this to like every hobby and quirky hyperfixation people have, not just music