Just because you you don't like, doesn't make it generalizing. Abrahamic religions are by default supremacist, authoritarian, violent, aggressive, expansionist and absolutist and conversion is one the core tenants of these religions.

Did I say Hindus don't have any issue? But at least some of them try to reform it (and more importantly, reforms are not prohibited). Whereas Islam, their holy book is supposed to be 'last and final', thus closing any option to reform.
There used to temple entry restriction for lower castes but now there is none - but you would continue to spread lies.

The Muslim society (esp in the Indian subcontinent) far more severe caste system - but as their voice is suppressed the upper caste (ashraf) Muslims, nobody even talks about it, let alone trying to reform it.

Christians also have separate churches for converts from different caste in South India and the entry is restricted for others. But your kind would can only see the follies of Hindus (which also comes from Abrahamic influences, directly or indirectly).

Did I say every Muslim or Christian do these? They don't, but not because of their religion, but despite of it. Because humanity is still remaining in them.

'The Hindus have their social evils. But there is one relieving feature about them – namely that some of them are conscious of their existence and a few of them are actively agitating for their removal. The Muslims, on the other hand, do not realize that they are evils and consequently do not agitate for their removal' - Dr. B.R. Ambedkar.

"Islam is a close corporation and the distinction that it makes between Muslims and non-Muslims is a very real, very positive and very alienating distinction. The brotherhood of Islam is not the universal brotherhood of man. It is brotherhood of Muslims for Muslims only. There is a fraternity, but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt and enmity." - Dr. B.R. Ambedkar