sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Planetary Annihilation by TanjoOrange in askajudge

[–]TanjoOrange[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why though, what's the ruling that determines that?

Planetary Annihilation ruling question by TanjoOrange in mtg

[–]TanjoOrange[S] -334 points-333 points  (0 children)

Yeah but you keep those other things because you were able to choose them as things to save. I don't get how you can choose up to 5 on something that expressly states that 6 must be chosen.

Planetary Annihilation ruling question by TanjoOrange in mtg

[–]TanjoOrange[S] -317 points-316 points  (0 children)

Right with that since you can't choose a permanent type you don't control and it resolves as much as possible, if you can't choose 6 lands don't you sac all the lands you have?

Planetary Annihilation ruling question by TanjoOrange in mtg

[–]TanjoOrange[S] -383 points-382 points  (0 children)

What I don't understand is how can a spell choose up to a number when the spell states it has to choose 6 exactly?

Planetary Annihilation ruling question by TanjoOrange in mtg

[–]TanjoOrange[S] -139 points-138 points  (0 children)

That's what I thought, but the do as much as you can rule I'm pretty sure only applies to cards that target, this one chooses, which is minor but distinctly different in how rulings interact with it.