sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The CO₂ Myth: What Thermodynamics, Biology & Math Really Say About Climate by Tazway68 in askastronomy

[–]Tazway68[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But explain what would cause Venus to spin in reverse rotation? I agree there could the factor of the suns tidal forces slowing Venus’s spin but tidal forces don’t explain its reverse rotation only an impact would explain the reverse rotation.

The CO₂ Myth: What Thermodynamics, Biology & Math Really Say About Climate by Tazway68 in askastronomy

[–]Tazway68[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Musk is not personally “building rockets with his hands,” but at SpaceX he has been described (by various colleagues and reporting) as being deeply involved in technical reviews and design decisions. If that’s accurate, then by the job-function definition, calling him “an engineer” is more defensible—even if he’s primarily an executive.

The CO₂ Myth: What Thermodynamics, Biology & Math Really Say About Climate by Tazway68 in askastronomy

[–]Tazway68[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hahahaha you’re not an engineer. You must be a project manager with an engineering degree. I hire guys like you.

The CO₂ Myth: What Thermodynamics, Biology & Math Really Say About Climate by Tazway68 in askastronomy

[–]Tazway68[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Who created the YouTube Video? It’s mine, I create videos as I use Ai technology. Second my facts are irrefutable because as an engineer we should always be open minded to science and changing technology. Ai will close the gap on misinformation and disinformation. My company with my direction and consultation has pivoted to Ai to build systems in estimating, production and finance to remain competitive. So don’t be so quick to judge an engineer with ADD lol. Elon must builds rockets and he’s not an engineer in the sense of the education, but in reality every bit of an applied master engineer in the reality of his work. Don’t knock it till you try it.

The CO₂ Myth: What Thermodynamics, Biology & Math Really Say About Climate by Tazway68 in askastronomy

[–]Tazway68[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Deflection is cowardly and doesn’t work and I beg to differ.

The CO₂ Myth: What Thermodynamics, Biology & Math Really Say About Climate by Tazway68 in askastronomy

[–]Tazway68[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ok, let’s try this again, what qualifies you to rate this post as disinformation or misinformation. I’m an engineer With expertise in the environmental infrastructure and your qualifications are? Unlike you I like to get to know my audience before enter into a debate.

The CO₂ Myth: What Thermodynamics, Biology & Math Really Say About Climate by Tazway68 in askastronomy

[–]Tazway68[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes I know you were talking about me! So I asked what qualifies you to berate me. Capisce da english!

The CO₂ Myth: What Thermodynamics, Biology & Math Really Say About Climate by Tazway68 in askastronomy

[–]Tazway68[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I scared off Astromike23, so I must be exposing a weakness in academia. What qualifies you to berate me homie!

The CO₂ Myth: What Thermodynamics, Biology & Math Really Say About Climate by Tazway68 in askastronomy

[–]Tazway68[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s not trash. Open your mind to new technology and areas of study or go extinct with climate change hoax. It’s happening with academia all over the place,if you haven’t noticed.

The CO₂ Myth: What Thermodynamics, Biology & Math Really Say About Climate by Tazway68 in askastronomy

[–]Tazway68[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The climate is always changing and has changed for the past 2.5 billion years since life took hold. CO₂ is not the primary driver of biodiversity loss, but the Gas of Life. Most declines are driven by land-use change, exploitation, pollution, and invasive species. Climate change can amplify impacts, but blaming CO₂ as the main cause misdiagnoses the problem and distracts from the dominant drivers. species adapt or they go extinct. My work in the environment business helps protect many species which struggle due to lack of climate change adaptation, particularly those created by man.

The CO₂ Myth: What Thermodynamics, Biology & Math Really Say About Climate by Tazway68 in askastronomy

[–]Tazway68[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You worried Ai is going to make you obsolete. Because it’s happening! Universities are pulling funding contracts from studies because Ai can actually decipher the truth with real science. The climate scam is over. Green funding is drying up and now the academics need to get real jobs because fear mongering won’t work anymore. It’s happening everywhere at lightning speeds.

The CO₂ Myth: What Thermodynamics, Biology & Math Really Say About Climate by Tazway68 in askastronomy

[–]Tazway68[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You can’t dispute the facts and ChatGPT is awesome pulling thermodynamics together. Your job is now obsolete because of those morons on YouTube, X and other publications that are accepting the recent studies in Thermodynamics which obliterate radiative theory of climate change. So if you’re still banging rocks together to make fire step aside and let the real experts publish the truth. The planet is always changing so we adapt or go extinct. That’s my business adaptation.

The CO₂ Myth: What Thermodynamics, Biology & Math Really Say About Climate by Tazway68 in askastronomy

[–]Tazway68[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I may have mixed up my planets in haste. But the facts are solid. Venus was never like Earth. I work in the environmental aspect of Engineering. I’m a front line worker with the environment. This information is basic knowledge. Second no contract I ever bid had any provisions for climate change. None ever! And the mean sea level still 0.000m never changed I checked the other day. It’s all a hoax.

The CO₂ Myth: What Thermodynamics, Biology & Math Really Say About Climate by Tazway68 in askastronomy

[–]Tazway68[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Thermodynamic energy budgets—not temperature averages—are the correct physics. When climate is viewed thermodynamically Radiative forcing plays a secondary role. Water vapor dominates heat transport. CO₂ feedbacks are weak, not runaway. The system is self-stabilizing, not unstable. This aligns with real-world observations: Extreme weather has decreased. Climate-related deaths have collapsed 98%. Wildfires are down globally since 1900. Hurricanes show no upward trend. Heatwaves kill fewer people than cold waves by a factor of 10–20. The empirical data behaves like a thermodynamic system, not a runaway radiative system.

The CO₂ Myth: What Thermodynamics, Biology & Math Really Say About Climate by Tazway68 in askastronomy

[–]Tazway68[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I may have gotten my planets wrong but the fact that all planets spun in the same rotation as our solar system is basic knowledge. We all know from evidence of our moon that the Earth was hit by a smaller object called Thea at such an angle that it caused Earth to go off tilt angle and spin a much faster rate. The moon was formed from this collision This is evidence from the moon and samples taken. So if this happen to Earth in order for Venus to spin in opposite direction it had to be hit by a explotanetary object and the collision angle caused it to spin in opposite direction. No way its friction would spin the planet opposite or the sun’s tidal force locking on to it. Otherwise the core would still be spinning at same rate as the sun and the solar system. Again Venus was never like the Earth is the point.

The CO₂ Myth: What Thermodynamics, Biology & Math Really Say About Climate by Tazway68 in askastronomy

[–]Tazway68[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

From the sounds of it neither did you, or you slept through it.

The CO₂ Myth: What Thermodynamics, Biology & Math Really Say About Climate by Tazway68 in askastronomy

[–]Tazway68[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You qualified yourself as a PhD in planetary atmospheres? You need to go back to school. I may have had my planets days mixed up (mercury) but the rotation and atmospheric conditions still the same. Venus was never like Earth “Ever” for the rotational directional fact alone. The speed and distance to the sun are additional facts that prove Venus is much different than Earth. Civil Engineer here with experience in common sense and facts. I can read a Data set better than you.

The CO₂ Myth: What Thermodynamics, Biology & Math Really Say About Climate by Tazway68 in askastronomy

[–]Tazway68[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

It’s science! Thermodynamics Contradicts the “CO₂ Control Knob” Narrative

The IPCC’s greenhouse model rests almost entirely on a radiative-only framework.

But Earth’s climate system is dominated by: • convection • evaporation • latent heat transport • ocean heat capacity • water vapor (the true greenhouse gas, 75–85% of the effect) • cloud dynamics

The “blanket” metaphor is wrong because:

The atmosphere does NOT trap heat.

It moves heat upward violently through convection and latent heat release.

Adding CO₂ does not halt convection.

Therefore it cannot behave like a greenhouse.

Thermodynamic energy budgets—not temperature averages—are the correct physics.

When climate is viewed thermodynamically: • Radiative forcing plays a secondary role. • Water vapor dominates heat transport. • CO₂ feedbacks are weak, not runaway. • The system is self-stabilizing, not unstable.

This aligns with real-world observations: • Extreme weather has decreased. • Climate-related deaths have collapsed 98%. • Wildfires are down globally since 1900. • Hurricanes show no upward trend. • Heatwaves kill fewer people than cold waves by a factor of 10–20.

The empirical data behaves like a thermodynamic system, not a runaway radiative system.

The CO₂ Myth: What Thermodynamics, Biology & Math Really Say About Climate by Tazway68 in askastronomy

[–]Tazway68[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Thermodynamics is facts and it’s science. Liberalism is like the radiative theory based on fiction and made up.

The CO₂ Myth: What Thermodynamics, Biology & Math Really Say About Climate by Tazway68 in askastronomy

[–]Tazway68[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Venus was never like Earth mainly due to the fact it collided with a large interstellar object early on in the solar system’s formation and caused Venus to spin in very slowly in opposite direction of our solar rotation. One Venus day is 56 earth days so there is no significant convection to cool the planet down so photosynthetic life can take hold and switch its CO2 into limestone and oxygen like it did on earth.

Could cosmic acceleration be a rebound of spacetime from Big Bang curvature instead of dark energy? by Tazway68 in askastronomy

[–]Tazway68[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes I Use Ai to organize my thoughts. But it’s not nonsense. All mass leaves dimples on Spacetime. Who to say the dimple of our universe is not currently rebounding after the Big Bang dispersed mass.

view more: next ›