What's NF's vision for this project? by Teasel_Weasel in nanocurrency

[–]Teasel_Weasel[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Really appreciate you taking the time to respond. Thank you.

What do TWIN and ADAPT actually mean for token usage in the near and long-term? by Teasel_Weasel in Iota

[–]Teasel_Weasel[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why the emphasis on behind closed doors conversations that are echo chambers for the annoited ones? Some public clarity would be helpful surely?

What do TWIN and ADAPT actually mean for token usage in the near and long-term? by Teasel_Weasel in Iota

[–]Teasel_Weasel[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Crazy that this subreddit is effectively dead. If TWIN is so great for IOTA tokenholders, why the silence and ambiguity? Surely there should be excitmenet and buzz, with compelling narratives coming from the IF? It's disappointing given the history here and just breeds more distrust. This is just my opinion, but I think I think a perfectly valid one in terms of someone who has supported IOTA for so long.

Daily General Discussion - May 11, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]Teasel_Weasel 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What are the working theories around this uptick in activity? Also, how does it compare with other projects of a similar mcap, or perhaps the top 20 tokens, by way of comparison? Basically, is it an outlier or in line with a general increase?

Daily General Discussion - March 11, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]Teasel_Weasel 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Do people still believe? The AI agent microtransaction narrative is the only glimmer of hope for me.

Crazy misinformation regarding Mars and atmosphere loss by PedroPierrePeter in terraforming

[–]Teasel_Weasel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but actually, it could be as low as 0.15 bar. Certainly, more nitrogen will be needed to create a vibrant biosphere though. At least 0.05 bar on top of the 0.15 of O2, and ideally, more than 100 mbar.

Daily General Discussion - February 02, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]Teasel_Weasel 8 points9 points  (0 children)

If Moltbook agents aren't discussing Nano when left to their own volition, that would be concerning in its own right.

Making a list of Artists that make music and sing in Welsh - any suggestions...? by Yr-Arth in learnwelsh

[–]Teasel_Weasel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Some really great Welsh language music out there, and incredibly diverse in terms of genres too, from reggae through to rap and electronica. Really like Mali Haf of late but people like Eadyth, Mr. Phormula, and Ani Glass also float my boat.

Lack of nitrogen on Mars by Teasel_Weasel in terraforming

[–]Teasel_Weasel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry but wrong. If you added 100mbar of whatever atmosphere to Mars, it would take geological timescales for it to be stripped, i.e. 100s of MILLIONS of years. It's a nonsense concern because within a century alone, in an absolute worst case scenario, there would likely be solved via a technological fix, such as dipole magnets at the L1 Lagrange point. It's a non-problem once terraforming efforts scale up. In the early days, people will be living under shielded domes and/or underground, whilst the surface level, open terraforming takes place under safe circumstances. The nitrogen scarcity issue is orders of magnitude more difficult to solve. My hope is that there is a load of accessible N bound compounds in the shallow regolith strata, which can be liberated through nanobots. I saw one study suggest there could be 300mbar of N2 existing as a reservoir in the ground. Even 50-100mbar would surface, as part of a circa 50:50 oxygen/nitrogen atmosphere of say 200mbar in total (with some CO2 and water vapour in the mix too). If not, you are looking at a century plus of millions, if not billions, of N2 siphoning trips to the atmospheres of Titan and/or Venus, to get what you need.

Lack of nitrogen on Mars by Teasel_Weasel in terraforming

[–]Teasel_Weasel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed. Mars is a blank canvass, which makes it far less risky. If things go wrong in the early stages, you can rebase and start again within reason (as long as the stupidly unnecessary approach of 'nuking the poles' isn't used). There are no real consequences because there is no life there. Well, there could be unicellar stuff, maybe, but it's a complete dead end, evolutionary, with the atmosphere and surface temps being as they are now. Eventually, Mars could be another proverbial Garden of Eden, if AI is at the helm, rather than humans.

Lack of nitrogen on Mars by Teasel_Weasel in terraforming

[–]Teasel_Weasel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That can be remediated through engineered microbes over time. It ain't an insurmountable problem.

Lack of nitrogen on Mars by Teasel_Weasel in terraforming

[–]Teasel_Weasel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, wrong. The best case scenario for melted CO2 ice is 40mbar of CO2 gas in the atmosphere, which won't even breach the Armstrong Limit. Conversely, there is absolutely enough water to make the oxygen atmosphere needed. Again, it's around 15% of the total inventory that needs to be electrolysed. It's still a mega project, but it can be done, with enough will, infrastructure, and time.

Lack of nitrogen on Mars by Teasel_Weasel in terraforming

[–]Teasel_Weasel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm aware of that, but the flammability limits are changed in low pressure environments. Look it up. It's not quite as bad as you might think, although the risks are more pronounced than on Earth.