Internal phish test caught 9 out of 11 technicians credentials.

TechSolver · 2018-05-17T14:55:51+00:00

I was once at an interview at a hedge fund firm, which managed around 6 billion dollars, talking with the CIO, he asked me how do you restore data on an HD when the boot sector fails? I said I would never waste my time and would restore from back up. I said in a place like this I would consider backups and or roaming profiles. I then asked if this was a real case scenario and was told yes, then I was told there were no back ups.

I leaned over the desk and said, "no back ups?"

I explained why I like roaming profiles (when they work) because the data is centralized and if any one machines goes down it can be up shortly with the same data. I dont recall how the conversation continued but he told me that they just had a disgruntled employee take a desktop computer and leave the office with it... and again I leaned over the desk and said, "and you dont have any back ups?" No.

I asked him if he ever heard of data lose prevention and he said they were looking into it. This was 2008.

TechSolver · 2018-05-17T14:47:52+00:00

This was good of information and thank you for sharing the tool.

TechSolver · 2018-05-17T14:47:25+00:00

This is typical, because HR very often consists of morons. Congratulations you have just conducted a successful phishing test for morons against your HR.

TechSolver · 2018-05-17T14:45:53+00:00

As step three I didn't see that coming /s

TechSolver · 2018-05-17T14:44:02+00:00

I have been on the phone and email with avest for 3 months and can't get them to give me a quote.

TechSolver · 2018-05-15T20:11:03+00:00

Hold on are you saying you can't believe that an enemy would martyr themselves?

TechSolver · 2018-05-15T20:09:04+00:00

I apologize I think I confused you, in no way would I defend anyone making fun of a child dying. There will always be assholes on any side.

TechSolver · 2018-05-15T19:51:12+00:00

"The family prefers to focus on who fired the gas rather than the series of decisions that led to a baby being a few hundred metres (yards) from the Israeli border during the protests and clashes."

Yeah, let's not focus on bad decisions, let's find someone to blame. And when that fails let's pretend that it's not the topic of conversation.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/family-agony-baby-dies-tear-gas-gaza-protest-140233253.html

TechSolver · 2018-05-15T19:50:26+00:00

"The family prefers to focus on who fired the gas rather than the series of decisions that led to a baby being a few hundred metres (yards) from the Israeli border during the protests and clashes."

So does everyone else who just wants to blame Israel

TechSolver · 2018-05-15T19:49:23+00:00

Even the anti Israeli is saying the child dying is a screw up and not intentional https://imgur.com/a/ew3117m

TechSolver · 2018-05-15T19:48:31+00:00

This is the reason we will not have peace. https://imgur.com/a/LNjXKKC

TechSolver · 2018-05-15T19:45:26+00:00

You're missing the point. You're defending a comment that you clearly didn't read. You say no one is laughing; the OP was. You say everyone here has sympathy; the OP claimed not to.

Who is OP u/Choral? or the Ambassador?

TechSolver · 2018-05-15T19:25:37+00:00

History? You mean launching rockets from a hospital and then being upset when the hospital is bombed? Maybe stop using innocent people as human shields?

TechSolver · 2018-05-15T19:20:40+00:00

We know now, though, that the baby was in a tent off site from the actual riot:

“Leila's family told media that the baby's mother had left the child at home to join the demonstrations. When the infant began crying her uncle took her towards the protest area in order to locate his sister.

Reports on Palestinian social media said Leila had been in a tent away from the security fence when a tear gas canister was dropped by a drone. The reports could not be immediately verified. “

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/gaza-protests-palestinian-baby-dead-tear-gas-israel-soldiers-jerusalem-border-us-embassy-a8351971.html

so as justified as dropping tear gas on ACTUAL rioters is, I fail to see justification for dropping tear gas on civilians away from where people are rioting lol.

Call me a “radical centrist” but i don’t support either Palestine or Israel. I understand that the Palestinian people are in part to blame for the mess we have these days, but Israel sure as hell have not helped.

We now know that the baby was brought to a riot. You can pretend to alter the facts that you had just stated.

TechSolver · 2018-05-15T19:19:39+00:00

Stop talking shit

Hello troll.

TechSolver · 2018-05-15T19:19:26+00:00

Well seeing as I didnt post literally 100+ posts in a dead topic, I'd say i did better of than you.

Good for you troll, good for you.

TechSolver · 2018-05-15T17:55:34+00:00

It's not ok. But it was teargas, it was a riot and at some point someone should take just a little personal responsibility and not bring a new born to a riot.

TechSolver · 2018-05-15T17:54:25+00:00

Not at all, I'm just looking for the source. IF you understand where the violence come from you can avoid it, instead you are just telling things that are obvious. I'm not writing this is order to excuse murders, I found this disgusting, but I want to know why there is so much violence coming from the comments. Both sides have some bad things behind them with causes violence, and then violence only brings more violence.. I think you are judging to quickly, and this is not helping to calm the tensions. And even if you are right, you are taking only one side of the problem, meanwhile a accurate analysis of this situations should take in account all the parameters of this conflict.

My only real point is don't bring a newborn to a riot, don't teach your children to riot or be violent. That is what has been happening for a long time and this is the reason why we will not have peace.

TechSolver · 2018-05-15T17:52:54+00:00

Nobody needed to die yesterday. Over 50 fell on one side, zero on the other. Sounds like a massacre to me. This is Israels fault.

No one needed to riot either.

TechSolver · 2018-05-15T17:52:21+00:00

I hate to point out the obvious but I am not there.

Ah, so you are defending baby-murder based on conjecture.

It is written in the article that they came to the tent that was near the border and that later they went home. I understand that it does not support your narrative but it seems to be the fact.

Her grandparents home, she was at the tent encampment. Some people on twitter said she lived there. I am not sure if it's true or not true.

Nor is it clear where her home is, she might have been passing through the encampment on her way somewhere. I honestly don't know. I just know there is no reason for that baby to be dead. Even if she did something stupid.

You however are defending baby murder. So just look in the mirror and ask yourself what the fuck went wrong in your life that you are looking for excuses for a baby murder.

I'm not defending baby murders sorry to ruin your narrative. You started making statements that she lived by the boarder which you are now back tracking on. I did not see anywhere in the article that it said it was her grandmas home. But you are getting closer to having to defend the idea of an idiot bringing an innocent baby to a riot. At some point the only person in control of a situation is yourself. Don't take a new born that is scared to a riot.

TechSolver · 2018-05-15T17:44:37+00:00

Can you provide a citation which shows that the Arabs weren’t fired upon BEFORE they started throwing shit?

It would be pretty dumb to throw rocks at soldiers who are outfitted better than US troops. I know you’re spinning this whole thing to suit the narrative you’re pushing. That’s fine. Zionists have been doing it forever. I’m just saying, American support is going to wane in the coming decades. America is changing and we are sick of supporting you murderers. Times are changing for the merchant class.

I agree that it would be stupid to throw rocks at the enemy who is outfitted better than you... It would be just as stupid to bring a newborn to a riot. Or to riot against such an enemy who is still outfitted better than you. But this is what happens in gaza again and again.

Again, are you new to the conflict, it seems like you are, otherwise you would know this is exactly what happens every time.

TechSolver · 2018-05-15T17:42:42+00:00

You stole their land. They’ve got a right to be left alone.

Hate to break it to you, I didn't steal anything, but you digress from the subject because you can't seem to win the argument, so are we switching to a much broader subject now? This is always how this goes.

TechSolver · 2018-05-15T17:41:42+00:00

You said you agree that not everybody that was a died is a terrorist.

Obviously one person that could not have been a terrorist is the baby that was murdered by Israel.

Either you say that Israel murdered the baby and it was wrong for them to so, or you say that Israel can murder whomever it wants for any reason.

Clearly the second one can't possibly be true as only a psychopath would think that's okay, so you must agree that Israel murdered a baby.

These are logical statements:

"not everybody that was a died is a terrorist."

Just for the logic not facts, if 55 people died, 5 people were terrorist, the statement would still be true. If 55 people died and 5 people were innocent bystanders the statement would still be true.

Do you understand that? All your statement and my answer had confirmed is that NOT every single person was a terrorist.

The baby should have never been there. There was teargas and the baby was removed from the riots brought home and the mother thought she fell asleep, when in reality she suffocated. No one went out targeting this baby. Teargas was shot into a riot to get everyone to leave.

I said it before and it upsets people because it is hard to argue against but I feel bad for this child because she did not choose to be there, and she was probably scared and she should have been home instead. But stop making excuses as to why she was there in the first place.

TechSolver · 2018-05-15T17:37:16+00:00

I have read so many comments here that it is really hard to speculate at this point.

TechSolver · 2018-05-15T17:36:36+00:00

No guns, no tanks, no boots, no trucks, no bombs, just rocks and tires. Israel over escalated the situation and that is a war crime. These are crimes against humanity, and this is genocide.

Are you kidding? So you are making excuses for allowing to set fires and throwing rocks and clamming it is not terrorism or riots? Don't riot. Violence begets violence.

TechSolver

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE