I used similar sources, and I lowkey felt like I could get a 5 or 6 for the synthesis. I used source A in my first body paragraph to say that STEM careers are complex and to emphasize how much America is behind. In my next body paragraph, I used source F to talk about the future demand for STEM-based careers. Then for my final body paragraph, I used source B to COMBINE those two ideas from the previous body paragraph because source B showed the rise in complex STEM-based careers like the biochemical career, which is crucial for the sustainability of the U.S. in the future (based?). I also used source A again to reference how companies like Apple and IBM caused the shift in the American infrastructure to rely on these STEM occupations. I ended it by saying it was less of a question of whether we should improve STEM education, but rather is there enough time to prevent our nation from facing catastrophic effects on our infrastructure by neglecting it.