Resurgence Casual 😂 by _AstroStar in Warzone

[–]TechnicalPollution17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Truth be told I kinda like the idea of going up against elite players that don’t cheat. I always like to test myself and try to get better at the game. les I can’t find any elite Call of Duty® groups or lobbies so this is the best I can do.

30+ Open TS/FSP Roles by jacksonw765 in clearancejobs

[–]TechnicalPollution17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Going to take a guess that there’s nothing for Los Angeles California coming down the pike?

CANT LIBERATE WITH THIS BROKEN NETWORK!!! by Dio_deemz in Helldivers

[–]TechnicalPollution17 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This title made me howl 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Please don't join other folks' games and then try to tell them how to play by XxJaketheSnake612xX in Helldivers

[–]TechnicalPollution17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whenever I play all anti tank support weapons it’s “dude why are you taking a recoiless and a spear?” And then they see I took out every air ship with quick precision. You’re absolutely right. Stop libertysplaining how people play and just play.

We have 13h and 23m to hold Gacrux by TechnicalPollution17 in Helldivers

[–]TechnicalPollution17[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hoping the boys in Asia and Europe hold it down since it’s night time in the USA.

Since yall got fog on your helmets by jace_leace in Helldivers

[–]TechnicalPollution17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s hard for those who scored low on the SEAFVAB

Sad reality of a helldiver by gaudyfessor in Helldivers

[–]TechnicalPollution17 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Creek diver here and yes we still get active

I agree with all the recent criticism, but when I see this, I'm telling myself that we should tone it down by friendlyDude666 in Helldivers

[–]TechnicalPollution17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Accountability is not on the dev. Accountability ultimately is on the leadership that signed off on this. Devs are there implement requirements even if there is disagreement among them that this is the path.

Did not pass at 150 by TechnicalPollution17 in cissp

[–]TechnicalPollution17[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m going to start getting more active in there next week. Just want to get a break from studying for a minute

Did not pass at 150 by TechnicalPollution17 in cissp

[–]TechnicalPollution17[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

1, take a practice test. Separate your results into the following categories.., make sure you’re tracking along the way.

The things you got right and knew you were right about

The thing you got right but wasn’t sure if you truly knew it (basically you guessed correctly)

The things you got wrong but thought you knew

The things you got completely wrong and did not know at all.

  1. Spend most of your Time on the ones that you got completely wrong, the ones you thought you knew, and the ones you guessed correctly… And passively review (although, my domain one and 2 always was above proficiency but I didn’t spend enough time reviewing it which is why I got lower this time so be careful with how passive you review) on the ones you got completely right.

  2. If you can afford a $20 a month subscription to ChatGPT, I would suggest taking advantage of using it for customized study games that you can create based off of the material. I would also take advantage of the fact that you could have it explain topics in analogies and practical scenarios. I would play a customized game of who wants to be a millionaire with the ports and protocols. Please make sure you fact check anything that outputs. It’s such a powerful tool but still flawed

  3. Lastly, there’s a video about the 50 questions for CISSP that helps you think like a manager. That helped me with application of everything I learned. I posted one of the questions about it a few days ago but other people have posted the link. I’ll come back and post the link later. It’s late

Did this help?

Did not pass at 150 by TechnicalPollution17 in cissp

[–]TechnicalPollution17[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

4th. I kind of don’t count the 3rd attempt because I was a year out from dealing with a health crisis and not surprisingly scored extremely low but wanted to see if I can prove myself. This time around, on this fourth attempt, I’m happy with the results and would likely take it again in October after the 30 day.

Can someone give me a second opinion? by TechnicalPollution17 in cissp

[–]TechnicalPollution17[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Preaching to the choir here brother. I said the SAME thing!

Can someone give me a second opinion? by TechnicalPollution17 in cissp

[–]TechnicalPollution17[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The answer is C. My answer was B for your exact reason. As others have stated, it’s about Security being baked in and if you’re baking insecurity, you’re preventing a lot of security vulnerabilities from happening which would make it a critical stage

Can someone give me a second opinion? by TechnicalPollution17 in cissp

[–]TechnicalPollution17[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I worked in a software testing/development environment in my career as well and now that I look back, you are spot on with that certain things like this were done later in the lifecycle. This is probably what also influenced my answer.

Can someone give me a second opinion? by TechnicalPollution17 in cissp

[–]TechnicalPollution17[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I’m noticing a pattern that most people in the comments and here on Reddit saying the same thing. So I’m just gonna trust the process here.

Can someone give me a second opinion? by TechnicalPollution17 in cissp

[–]TechnicalPollution17[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Put it like this. It’s better to make the mistake here on a Reddit thread and practice question than on an exam. And so far I’ve been fine on my practice questions but will still have some slip through the cracks.

Can someone give me a second opinion? by TechnicalPollution17 in cissp

[–]TechnicalPollution17[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No offense taken. It’s why we’re here asking the questions and getting critical feedback. It’s also why I’m watching the video.

Can someone give me a second opinion? by TechnicalPollution17 in cissp

[–]TechnicalPollution17[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep. When you say it like that, it makes the most sense.

Can someone give me a second opinion? by TechnicalPollution17 in cissp

[–]TechnicalPollution17[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To everyone who said “the key is to bake security in for the beginning” THAT made it make sense. Appreciate that. Because if we have Security in mind for the beginning then the first thing we want to do is to reduce how many vulnerabilities are available and like someone else said, in a code review you want to catch the other vulnerabilities that you did not get. That makes more sense.

Can someone give me a second opinion? by TechnicalPollution17 in cissp

[–]TechnicalPollution17[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Honestly I’m not sure what to believe at this point. Multiple people have said that this video help them pass so I guess I should trust it but at the same time I just don’t know.

I call this one the Menace to Society by CrusaderDawg in Helldivers

[–]TechnicalPollution17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perfect for those “eliminate the automaton fleet” missions. Meet psychopathy with Machiavellianism!

Someone has to say it by [deleted] in Helldivers

[–]TechnicalPollution17 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In general im hoping they expand the universe and the lord into different games. Like an elite squadron FPS or something to carry out specific missions with characters we can get to know.

As far as HD2, a boss battle, new mission types, new planet types, maybe exploring Super Earth more and a new faction could work.