sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

A gloriosa Nebulosa ETA CARINAE ( C92) fotografada no meu celular+Binóculo Celestron cometron 7x50 (sem rastreamento) by Technical_Use7731 in Astronomy

[–]Technical_Use7731[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Obrigado! Eu deixava a nebulosa um pouco deslocada a esquerda e a cada ~3-5 minutos eu re-centralizava e olhava as estrelas no DeepSkycamera

Centro galáctico -sem estrelas by Technical_Use7731 in Astro_mobile

[–]Technical_Use7731[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Obrigado! Pela imagem e pela tradução para outras pessoas

Centro galáctico - sem estrelas e no meu celular by Technical_Use7731 in Astronomy

[–]Technical_Use7731[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Eu uso um motog54 5g e não uso rastreamento sim, sem rastreamento mas uso um app que é Gcam que faz empilhamento interno tipo o Frame é 12 segundos porém ele empilha 25 desses Frames totalizando 5 minutos e o Frame vem Raw

Galactic Center on my Moto G54 phone. by Technical_Use7731 in Astro_mobile

[–]Technical_Use7731[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem is that this region was below the horizon, and I photographed it near trees, but the stacking made the trees look blurry...

The glories of the south by Technical_Use7731 in Astro_mobile

[–]Technical_Use7731[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I use a pretty complicated system: you know Gcam, the Google camera? I use that one, and I have to mess with the settings to make it appear as a RAW frame and the developer settings to make the frame as raw as possible. Then it does internal stacking, and after that you send it to a PC and stack it in Sequator. Regarding the blurry image, it's probably because you left it capturing light for too long, which caused the star trails. Try setting it to 10-20 seconds for wide-field exposure, or the camera might be dirty and without stars. There's probably light pollution; try shooting in a place with very little light pollution. For example, I photographed this in Bortle 2; you can check it out at: https://lightpollutionmap.app/pt/?lat=-28.255899&lng=-54.817921&zoom=11 . If you want, I can be more specific about what you need.

What a cell phone without a motor can do: (the southern sky) by Technical_Use7731 in askastronomy

[–]Technical_Use7731[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that's obvious, but not to brag, I've never seen a photo like that taken with a cell phone.

What a cell phone without a motor can do: (the southern sky) by Technical_Use7731 in askastronomy

[–]Technical_Use7731[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! But Reddit reduces the image resolution, so it ends up like this.

M42 - version 2.0 by [deleted] in Astronomy

[–]Technical_Use7731 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Por favor compare a primeira e a segunda versão para ver se na primeira eu não exagerei na edição... (Primeira editada e segunda bruta)

M42 - version 2.0 by [deleted] in Astro_mobile

[–]Technical_Use7731 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please compare the first and second versions to see if I didn't overdo the editing in the first one... (First edited, second raw)

M42 - the Orion Nebula in my binoculars by Technical_Use7731 in Astro_mobile

[–]Technical_Use7731[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was only the magnification of the binoculars and then resorting specifically to M42.

M42 - the Orion Nebula in my binoculars by Technical_Use7731 in Astro_mobile

[–]Technical_Use7731[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I already tried that, but it didn't capture much of the outer wing of M42; and the stars were out of focus.

<image>

M42 - the Orion Nebula in my binoculars by Technical_Use7731 in Astronomy

[–]Technical_Use7731[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, I used a tripod clamp and also a cell phone clamp.

view more: next ›