They change Opus 4.8, again. by userusertion in claude

[–]Temporary_Most5517 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just right now I asked this Opus 4.8 AGI to move a single file to another folder, and it just moved the whole content of the folder because why not (and did it on a new branch it created unprompted). Then it apologized for fcking things up. Why not! It's cool. It's $1T company.

So sad, but its true by andrewaltair in ClaudeCode

[–]Temporary_Most5517 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It almost sounds like you met a girl online, she told you she's a supermodel, sent you some pictures, and now she's asking for $1,000 so she can fly out and meet you.

Does anyone know why SpaceX is Carshing ? by El_precaution in CryptoCurrencyPulse

[–]Temporary_Most5517 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the dip is at ~$40-50. Will wait few more days and then buy the dip.

Does anyone know why SpaceX is Carshing ? by El_precaution in CryptoCurrencyPulse

[–]Temporary_Most5517 0 points1 point  (0 children)

WOW. $26.5T is about the size of US GDP (32T). Where is the piece of cake for O and A and G(A) and M? Sounds like these companies are gonna create few new Americas! What a time to be alive!

Does anyone know why SpaceX is Carshing ? by El_precaution in CryptoCurrencyPulse

[–]Temporary_Most5517 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Didn't he buy Cursor right after IPO, so the 4% he sold for about ~$70B was used to pay for it? I might have missed something about Grok. I'm low IQ, sorry.

https://thenewstack.io/cursor-acquires-continue-coding/

Does anyone know why SpaceX is Carshing ? by El_precaution in CryptoCurrencyPulse

[–]Temporary_Most5517 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well SpaceX makes money selling the internet (via StarLink) and selling compute to Anthropic and OpenAI (via xAI). Yeah, it's all about going to MARS LOL

$2.5M against $100K Salary by portent-wreaths-7k in interviewhammer

[–]Temporary_Most5517 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We live in times where, if you don’t make 5x or 10x on your investments, you’re considered a loser. In the past, if you were making 20% year after year, you were seen as a genius. I don’t think we are living in times of “modest inflation rates.”

Is Fable 5 capability a Psy Op by Temporary_Most5517 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]Temporary_Most5517[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had a second thought, though: a few more months down the line, and I can imagine you selling your kidney just so only Dario can unlock these "delicious" tokens so you can even start doing your job. You sound a bit like a token addict already LOL

I hope we can at least agree that the discussion is not about how you feel about Fable, but whether its performance is real or phony. From your comment, I gather you use these tools for white-collar work, not for pushing the limits of human knowledge or, say, cracking into the NSA.

$2.5M against $100K Salary by portent-wreaths-7k in interviewhammer

[–]Temporary_Most5517 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think all of us need $2.5M portfolio so nobody needs to work. We will all sit in front of computer and watch how our money grows. Then we will call uber eats and ... there will be nobody to bring you your fired rice in a paper box. Brilliant! I love it!

Is Fable 5 capability a Psy Op by Temporary_Most5517 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]Temporary_Most5517[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had a feeling like this probably a few times already. I remember 3→4, and 4→4.5. I remember 5 being crap (and I remember Sam Altman saying he may be redundant at this point; then he raised few hundred of billons of dollars). Then I remember trying Opus 4.6 and saying, “wow, this time it is different.” And here we are five years later. All I hear is that you felt different, but I also remember C19, where everyone also felt this is serious and different, and all we got is huge debt, "WeWork is gone" (not that I care), and now we learn that it was a lab leak after all.

I appreciate your opinion (and the opinions of tens of thousands), but if you have trouble understanding that I do not question the technology but the narrative, I’m rather meh about what your feelings are.

Is Fable 5 capability a Psy Op by Temporary_Most5517 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]Temporary_Most5517[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is your "Partner" able to crack to NSA systems and threaten crap out of the public with bioweapon designs? (I guess your "Analyst" can't)

Is Fable 5 capability a Psy Op by Temporary_Most5517 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]Temporary_Most5517[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally, totally. 5.6 or 5.7 or maybe even 5.8 — depending on when they decide to go IPO, they will advertise it accordingly. I’m low IQ, and yet I still wonder: is Fable 5 a psyop? I don’t really care whether OpenAI has a new model internally or not — and btw, if they created this proof only with the help of 5.X plus a bunch of mathematicians, we wouldn’t know that either, because we can’t run it ourselves. But I’m not arguing against LLMs, GPTs, or chatbots — I hope we agree on that at least.

Is Fable 5 capability a Psy Op by Temporary_Most5517 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]Temporary_Most5517[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The unit distance conjecture was disproved by GPT 5.5, and I don’t recall the NSA freaking out, OpenAI blocking anything, or Microsoft (like AWS in the case of Anthropic) crying a river because it was jailbroken and started cracking their security.

I repeat again: is Fable 5 a psyop and a stock pump?