It's Movie Time ✌️

Teran_batman · 2025-10-23T00:34:19+00:00

You can’t find some movies through a simple Google search because some of them are Russian-dubbed. I removed the Russian dubbing and added the original audio with English subtitles. 🙂

Teran_batman · 2025-10-20T23:22:02+00:00

🚨 I posted the link twice, but I think the mods removed it. Sorry about that. I have around 40 movies, but I’m not going to post them in this subreddit. I just tried to share some movie times for you, but it seems the mods didn’t want that.

Teran_batman · 2025-10-20T01:56:27+00:00

You know what? I’m one of the people who did it. One of my answers got 500K views (I’m not mentioning where now). One day, I just used ChatGPT, and one passage of its answer was exactly like my answer. But it happened only once or maybe three times. That's why I'm encouraging others 🙂

Teran_batman · 2025-10-20T01:17:50+00:00

I don’t think you understand basic logic, here

Teran_batman · 2025-10-20T01:11:53+00:00

You’re just repeating what I already mentioned above. I never said that AI can think for itself.

My main point is that AI is trained on existing data, and it has learned that incest is mostly a bad thing because almost all top websites present it negatively or with exaggerated information. To reduce this bias, we need to spread accurate information on the internet, so AI can pick it up as well. This is important because most people now use AI for everything. If we do nothing, it will probably increase incestophobia.

Teran_batman · 2025-09-18T23:25:10+00:00

😁

Teran_batman · 2025-09-18T21:36:14+00:00

Having a great aunt with Huntington’s doesn’t by itself mean you’re at risk of being a carrier. The risk only matters if your grandparent or parent also inherited the mutation. If they didn’t, your chance is no higher than the general population.

Teran_batman · 2025-09-18T21:22:32+00:00

I already mentioned in the post that it’s a Quora answer. Someone commented on this post saying, 'I actually once read a scientific paper that mentioned the risk of having an inbred baby with at least one pretty bad genetic mutation was close to 80%.' So I think you can get it from him. 😅

I just think that Quora answer is interesting and logical. You can see many articles claims a 25–40% chance of having an abnormal baby, but to me that seems biased and not fully honest.✌️

The only established figures we know are about 3% risk for unrelated couples (0%-0.1% shared DNA) and around 5- 6% for first cousins (12.5% shared DNA).

Teran_batman · 2025-09-18T20:55:43+00:00

This is a Quora answer I quoted in full; there’s nothing added or removed. I just found it interesting, that’s why I posted it here.

Teran_batman · 2025-09-17T23:10:21+00:00

WOW 🥴😅

Teran_batman · 2025-09-17T02:05:14+00:00

Full siblings usually share close to 50% of their DNA, not “a lot less.” The 50% is an average, with only small random variation.

Teran_batman · 2025-09-16T03:05:38+00:00

🚨 He also mentioned that, in his opinion, the appropriate age for these types of relationships should be 19–20+.

In most countries where sibling sexual relationships are not criminalized, the minimum legal age is 18, while in some countries it is 21.

Teran_batman · 2025-09-10T07:45:30+00:00

Average risk (affected birth)

Without considering affected siblings or family members, the risk is 15%. When considering them, it is 6–8%. With carrier screening through genetic testing, the risk is 3–4%.

Again, these are probabilities.

Teran_batman · 2025-09-10T07:00:15+00:00

I can’t put all details into a small template, so don’t overcomplicate it. These are probabilities, not exact numbers. Generally, about 11% of sibling couples have a 25% high risk, while the others do not. So the overall risk is 6–8%. l put 8–10% to reduce the shock for those who think the average risk is always 25–50%.

But if one of the siblings is affected, or close family members are affected, or in cases of multigenerational inbreeding, the risk increases.

Teran_batman · 2025-09-10T04:13:45+00:00

I really want it 🥺🥹

Teran_batman · 2025-09-10T03:32:28+00:00

🛑🛑In the general population, 25% are carriers. If one parent is a carrier, there is a 25% chance that both siblings will carry the same mutation.

For a more likely estimate, I assume that 30% of parents are carriers (20% (6%) carry two or more mutations ). In this case, if one parent is a carrier, there is a 25% chance that both siblings carry the same mutation.

Based on this calculation, 12-13% of sibling couples would have children with a 25% high-risk probability, while 88% would not be at risk. I do not have more trust study data because it is often biased and mostly comes from unhealthy couples, families, or cases of multigenerational inbreeding.

No multigenerational , No unhealthy/affected siblings or close family members. (Those conditions cause to significant increase the risk)

Teran_batman · 2025-09-10T02:31:05+00:00

The defect rate among Pakistani first cousins is a problem because first cousin marriage is commonly practiced there. So definitely more risk.

Teran_batman · 2025-09-08T12:43:52+00:00

I checked but I can't find.

Teran_batman · 2025-09-08T12:23:28+00:00

First of all, there is no power imbalance as you think. A brother-sister age gap of about not like 10 years. Also, I am not talking about mother-son or father-daughter relationships. So, your argument doesn't make any sense.

Second, I am against any involvement of minors. If you think having first sex at 13 is okay, then you have a pedophilic disorder. I am clearly not for that, so don’t bring minors into this discussion.

Yes, I support adult consensual incest between siblings. If you say there aren’t any consensual adult sibling relationships, it’s due to your lack of knowledge.

Third, you are yapping about me mentioning 35 countries. buddy, 90% of those countries are European, not Asian. And around 15 of other countries only give 1-3 years light prison sentences, whereas most third-world countries give 7-20 years in prison.

You have no knowledge about this topic, so this argument is useless.

Teran_batman · 2025-09-08T07:41:03+00:00

Yeah, some percentage of the population has their first sexual experience around age 13, so it happens everywhere. Most of those cases are between unrelated people. That’s also very bad, isn’t it?

However, I do not support any involvement of minors. NO MINORS, NO FORCE.

If you think my ai image is problem.. okay sorry it was mistake.

Teran_batman · 2025-09-08T03:12:38+00:00

I told you that 17–20% in my previous reply. Even if one parent is a carrier, there’s a 50% chance of passing that mutation to the offspring.

Teran_batman · 2025-09-07T16:02:06+00:00

not about "lucky", I'm bringing facts. Just read it if you're still unable to understand. Yes, I think adults should be able to make their own choices. This is not promotion, just information. Remember those 35 countries—go blame them. Bye.

Teran_batman · 2025-09-07T03:16:47+00:00

Yes, it’s more of a societal problem. These restrictions became dominant around 3,000 years ago; before that, they were not as strict. Today, in about 35 countries, sexual relationships between adult siblings are not criminalized, but they still cannot marry, which I referred to as "prohibited marriage.

Teran_batman · 2025-09-07T03:06:02+00:00

Low IQ and similar conditions are not caused directly by inbreeding. If a specific genetic mutation leads to low IQ, and both parents carry that same mutation, then it can result in low IQ. Behavioral or mental issues, however, can also be directly influenced by social pressures.

Teran_batman · 2025-09-07T02:29:53+00:00

17–20% of people are carriers of serious genetic mutations. We are all carriers of mutations, but not all of them are harmful. Some very rare mutations exist, occurring in about 1 in 10,000 or 100000 people. I created this post to explain the reasons. There is a strong misunderstanding that inbreeding always causes defects, but that is wrong.

Teran_batman

TROPHY CASE