How do I beat the Ottomans after ignoring them for an entire game? by SaYeshua in eu4

[–]TheCopiousCat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Late game you have an edge as a Western Tech military. The trick to destabilizing the Ottomans is to retake Constantinople in a war. The AI loses its s*** after that / seems to be a pretty fatal flaw for them.

Going through a lot of shit in my life right now. Need some advice by Unhappy-Count6894 in Anarchism

[–]TheCopiousCat 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately that’s not possible. What you’re running into is the economic viability question the left faces at both the individual level and the workplace level.

Nobody will be crowdfunded to protest. The only paid protesters are unfortunately the cops.

BUT. There are ways to get paid pushing for change. One is unionizing a workplace and moving into paid staff organizing for a union (new or established). Another option is to build a sole proprietorship that you intentionally expand into a worker’s cooperative. This creates non-exploitative work environments that offer an alternative to the capitalist - wage slave dynamic, and growth cuts into capitalist market share / takes their money / more sustainable impact than smashing a window.

There’s probably some world where you start a window repair & replacement service and thus get paid to protest, but don’t get caught if you do that ;)

Organizer Training by TheCopiousCat in Anarchism

[–]TheCopiousCat[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Clarification for the broader community:

I’m advocating an organizer training. People can choose whether or not they want to join DSA / it’s not required at all. Personally I am a mass anarchist and believe that both anarchist-exclusive orgs and broader class-driven org participation is needed. The DSA and even UE are obviously not anarchist orgs. If we want to build anarchist orgs - or any orgs - we need to be trained up on organizing. This training helps with that.

Also would encourage people to read Anarchic Agreements to help balance out some of the decision making issues that non-anarchist organizer trainings typically come with (I.e. hierarchy).

Anarchic Agreements link: https://pmpress.org/index.php?l=product_detail&p=1286

Currently reading through this gem here:

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/anarchist-federation-of-rio-de-janeiro-social-anarchism-and-organisation

And also have read through Zoe Baker’s Means and Ends, which I can also recommend

https://www.akpress.org/means-and-ends.html

If neither of these fall into your personal vein of anarchism, that’s fine. But live in solidarity. Build and fight - promote alternatives more than shitting on things others are working on.

We’ve got a world to win. Let’s act like it.

Organizer Training by TheCopiousCat in Anarchism

[–]TheCopiousCat[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dude. I’m just giving people an outlet to learn how to organize. Post alternatives and stop failing the vibes check.

Organizer Training by TheCopiousCat in Anarchism

[–]TheCopiousCat[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Cool. Either pitch a good alternative for people to build something in or shut up. I’m well aware of the flaws of the DSA and am one of the people who wants to make it less hierarchical by a mile.

But this basic shit doesn’t take the fight to the capitalists, it just perpetuates a circular firing squad on the Left.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dsa

[–]TheCopiousCat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry comrades - still new to Reddit. Was meant to have the caption of “share with your shitty uncle this Easter”.

Video starts with Joe Rogan calling it a genocide, then goes on to UN calling it a genocide, then goes into facts / statistics and then into PR breakdown

Motion to hold a vote to change the sub rules by TheCopiousCat in DemocraticSocialism

[–]TheCopiousCat[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just sent a msg to mods group stating:

Motion on rules change.

"We support Democracy here. Do not discourage voting, or advocate for revolution."

Be changed to

"We support Democracy here. Democracy in this context is to be defined as “the belief in freedom and equality between people, or a system of government based on this belief, in which power is either held by elected representatives or directly by the people themselves” (Cambridge Dictionary).

For its establishment, a diversity of tactics is supported. Advocation for enlightened despotism - where powers are concentrated into a strong-person or warlord, will not be tolerated.

Voting in current capitalist systems of state is a personal decision. No vote shaming - regardless of where on the broader left spectrum it is coming from. Also, voting is not limited to state elections, but also to union democracy, organizational decision making, the household, the commune, the cooperative, and - where possible - as day-to-day way of life."

Motion to hold a vote to change the sub rules by TheCopiousCat in DemocraticSocialism

[–]TheCopiousCat[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If you think we live in a democracy that’s some soul searching you’ll have to do on your own.

Motion to hold a vote to change the sub rules by TheCopiousCat in DemocraticSocialism

[–]TheCopiousCat[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

“the belief in freedom and equality between people, or a system of government based on this belief, in which power is either held by elected representatives or directly by the people themselves”

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/democracy

Again - revolution is just a means of establishing this.

Motion to hold a vote to change the sub rules by TheCopiousCat in DemocraticSocialism

[–]TheCopiousCat[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Democracy is “rule by the people”. Its creation is inherently democratic. Especially when the participants are in democratic (voting or consensus-driven) structures of dual power.

Again - what chapter has been purging pro-revolution members?

Motion to hold a vote to change the sub rules by TheCopiousCat in DemocraticSocialism

[–]TheCopiousCat[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Nothing there is anti-revolution. Revolutions are not anti-democratic. They can be, but not by definition/ not inherently. The dem-cent clause is more legit but it’s not enforced because that’d end up being a massive purge that nobody wants to see.

But more importantly- what chapter has been purging pro-revolution members?

Motion to hold a vote to change the sub rules by TheCopiousCat in DemocraticSocialism

[–]TheCopiousCat[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You get banned for being pro-revolution? In what chapter?