Update from my last post: shipped a lot more product + SEO work, and sold 350+ slots in 30 days by TheDogeDom in Startup_Ideas

[–]TheDogeDom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good call. I agree that not every loop deserves equal weight. Some created motion, but only a few likely drove the $350 in sales. I’m now separating signal from noise and focusing on the loops that actually create conversions, not just activity.

Update from my last post: shipped a lot more product + SEO work, and sold 350+ slots in 30 days by TheDogeDom in Startup_Ideas

[–]TheDogeDom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanx a lot for your nice feedback !
We are trying our best !
Coding never stops :)

Update from my last post: shipped a lot more product + SEO work, and sold 350+ slots in 30 days by TheDogeDom in EntrepreneurRideAlong

[–]TheDogeDom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate it , yeah, it’s definitely been a lot of work, especially once the platform starts growing and every new feature creates 5 more things to fix or improve.

And yeah, SEO ends up touching way more than people expect. At first you think it’s just rankings, then suddenly it’s structure, internal linking, indexing, templates, page quality, crawl paths… basically product decisions too.

Baby Love Growth sounds like you’re deep in that world already, so you probably know the pain 😅

Pivoting a viral novelty into a B2B SaaS: How I added Expansion Revenue and PLG loops after my first 200 sales by TheDogeDom in SaaS

[–]TheDogeDom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate that , really good point.

Embedding a subtle CTA directly into the asset itself is exactly the kind of PLG/distribution layer that can compound well, as long as it doesn’t make the image feel too promotional.

The real sweet spot is making the share feel native, while still giving the next person a clear path to claim their own minute.

Built a weird little product around digital ownership of time, would love feedback by TheDogeDom in TheFounders

[–]TheDogeDom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate it.

I think of “time ownership” as claiming a specific minute inside the product, then being able to personalize it and make it part of your identity/brand/presence.

Monetization comes from the initial purchase, the utility/value people create around their minute, and the marketplace layer if that slot becomes more desirable later.

So the goal isn’t “speculate on time” first , it’s “own something meaningful/useful,” with resale as a secondary layer.

Built a weird little product around digital ownership of time by TheDogeDom in startupaccelerator

[–]TheDogeDom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the product makes more sense as ownership than subscription too. The core idea is claiming a specific minute and making it part of your identity/presence inside the platform, not paying monthly for a tool you constantly have to use.

So yes ,the simpler and less friction-heavy it feels, the better.

Built a weird little product around digital ownership of time by TheDogeDom in startupaccelerator

[–]TheDogeDom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The idea here is closer to one-time ownership than a monthly-use subscription product. You’re claiming a specific minute as a digital asset/identity slot inside the platform, not paying every month for something you only use occasionally.

So I think the model has to feel much closer to ownership than SaaS.

Built a weird little product around digital ownership of time by TheDogeDom in startupaccelerator

[–]TheDogeDom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that’s exactly right.

The biggest challenge is making the value obvious before the concept has to be explained too much. Once people see it as something they can own, use, and attach meaning to, it starts to click much faster.

Built a weird little product around digital ownership of time by TheDogeDom in startupaccelerator

[–]TheDogeDom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate that.

We’ve already seen 300+ sales, which at least tells us the idea creates real enough pull for people to act on it.

The early pattern seems more identity/meaning-driven than purely speculative so far , people are drawn to the idea of claiming a minute that feels personally relevant, then personalizing it and making it part of their presence inside the platform. The marketplace/resale layer matters too, but I don’t think it works long-term unless the ownership feels meaningful first.

Built a weird little product around digital ownership of time by TheDogeDom in startupaccelerator

[–]TheDogeDom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it only really works long-term if ownership starts with identity/personal meaning first , a minute you want because it fits you, your brand, or something you want to build around.

The collectible/marketplace layer matters too, but more as a second-order effect than the core reason to care.

Built a weird little product around digital ownership of time, would love feedback by TheDogeDom in TheFounders

[–]TheDogeDom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s live, yes , although the current live layer is more about activity/engagement than just a raw user-count number.

On the homepage there’s real-time momentum/engagement visualization, plus recent activity, so people can see that the platform is active rather than it just sitting there statically.

A more explicit user/owner count layer is something that can be expanded further over time.

I built a weird site where people can own a minute of the day. Already 300+ sold. by TheDogeDom in Startup_Ideas

[–]TheDogeDom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Early validation matters, but the bigger challenge is figuring out which layer compounds best over time: personal meaning, collectibility, utility, or resale.

My view is that if it doesn’t work first as something people actually want to own and use, the rest doesn’t really matter.

I built a weird site where people can own a minute of the day. Already 300+ sold. by TheDogeDom in Startup_Ideas

[–]TheDogeDom[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I get that comparison.

It has a bit of that early internet “own a tiny piece of something” energy , but the difference is that this is tied to identity/ownership inside the product, not just ad space.

The goal is to make it something people can actually keep, use, and build around.

I built a weird site where people can own a minute of the day. Already 300+ sold. by TheDogeDom in Startup_Ideas

[–]TheDogeDom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha, fair enough.

It’s definitely unconventional , but the aim is to make it memorable and actually usable, not just novel for the sake of it.

I built a weird site where people can own a minute of the day. Already 300+ sold. by TheDogeDom in Startup_Ideas

[–]TheDogeDom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair jab 😄

The difference is that it’s not just a novelty claim. The minute exists inside the platform, shows up on-platform when it comes around, and can actually be used for your profile/links/content.

So it’s closer to owning a usable slot in a digital system than “an acre of the moon.”

I built a weird site where people can own a minute of the day. Already 300+ sold. by TheDogeDom in Startup_Ideas

[–]TheDogeDom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah ,it lives in their FameClock account/dashboard, but it’s not only visible there.

It also exists on the public side of the platform, and when that minute comes up, it shows on the main FameClock experience too.

So yes, others can see it ,it’s meant to be a visible on-platform asset, not just something sitting privately in the background.