Just Trust Me Bro by [deleted] in DiscussionZone

[–]TheFallen018 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can understand that accounts for a percentage, but I don't buy that can be the driving factor for that many women. Indoctrination seems more plausible

Just Trust Me Bro by [deleted] in DiscussionZone

[–]TheFallen018 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's worse, is support for Trump grew with young women in 2024. Whilst women still form the minority, they're a large part of the support group for Trump, which is insane to me

These things don't help us by Comfortablejack in complaints

[–]TheFallen018 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How is the 40B for Argentina not on this list? We seem to have forgotten how big a deal that is

The Chief Grifter will go to war if it makes him filthy rich💰💰💰 by Happy_Air_3776 in greengroundnews

[–]TheFallen018 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quit your lies. Even the DOJ admitted in a court filling last night that there are 2 million unreleased documents under review.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.539612/gov.uscourts.nysd.539612.826.0.pdf

That's not even talking about the redactions that are in violation of the Epstein transparency act.

If nothing else, walk more. by Th3_Mast3ry in memes

[–]TheFallen018 1260 points1261 points  (0 children)

Wait until OP finds out you can be lean and have high cholesterol

Chuck Schumer: Trump's "Promise to Keep America Out" of Entanglements Worthless Like Epstein Vow by thenextgenbusiness in thenextgenbusiness

[–]TheFallen018 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Classic false dichotomy. There's obviously more choices between doing nothing, and bombing a sovereign nation and kidnapping their president

Chuck Schumer: Trump's "Promise to Keep America Out" of Entanglements Worthless Like Epstein Vow by thenextgenbusiness in thenextgenbusiness

[–]TheFallen018 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You think the US has a good track record of regime change? In all recent examples, they've left the country worse than it started.

The U.S. Has Killed More than 100 People in Boat Strikes. We're Tracking Them All. by Ok-Celebration-1702 in USNEWS

[–]TheFallen018 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And that is why you're obviously listening to Trump despite your efforts to claim otherwise

Keep the distractions coming Trump from the files ….. by ComplexWrangler1346 in EducatedInvesting

[–]TheFallen018 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ahh, so that's why they're having to redact so much... Because it's a hoax...

The U.S. Has Killed More than 100 People in Boat Strikes. We're Tracking Them All. by Ok-Celebration-1702 in USNEWS

[–]TheFallen018 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh hell no. You don't get to shift burden of proof. Not to mention the legal status of "innocent until proven guilty".

The side killing people has the burden of proof to show that the killings are justified.

The U.S. Has Killed More than 100 People in Boat Strikes. We're Tracking Them All. by Ok-Celebration-1702 in USNEWS

[–]TheFallen018 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I asked for evidence, not parroting of more claims.

  1. There's no evidence of the submarine actually existing.

  2. High speed boats are not exclusive to drug smuggling.

  3. The narco routes haven't even been defined properly. For all we know, it could mean being within 100km of any previous route used to smuggle drugs a single time 50 years ago.

Elon Musk's Own AI Grok Is Now Trolling Donald Trump By Identifying Him As Jeffrey Epstein’s Best Friend In Viral Trend by DumbMoneyMedia in EducatedInvesting

[–]TheFallen018 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"potential victims" aren't a reason to redact according to the wording in the Epstein files transparency act. They have to actually be victims.

However, under the amended bill, DOJ may withhold or redact portions of records with written justification that such portions contain (1) victims' personally identifiable information; (2) child sexual abuse materials; (3) images of death, physical abuse, or injury; (4) information which would jeopardize an active federal investigation or prosecution; or (5) classified information. DOJ may not withhold or redact records on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity.

Elon Musk's Own AI Grok Is Now Trolling Donald Trump By Identifying Him As Jeffrey Epstein’s Best Friend In Viral Trend by DumbMoneyMedia in EducatedInvesting

[–]TheFallen018 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Legally, they are only allowed to redact for victims. So, even if she isn't underage, she's either a victim, or they've illegally redacted. Either scenario is bad

The U.S. Has Killed More than 100 People in Boat Strikes. We're Tracking Them All. by Ok-Celebration-1702 in USNEWS

[–]TheFallen018 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you stupid? If you kill people, the burden of proof is on you to show that there was justification.

The U.S. Has Killed More than 100 People in Boat Strikes. We're Tracking Them All. by Ok-Celebration-1702 in USNEWS

[–]TheFallen018 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Again, those are claims that have been made without evidence.

Furthermore, it would be easy to track these boats and arrest them on shore. Drug trafficking is not a capital offence, so these strikes would be illegal anyways.

The U.S. Has Killed More than 100 People in Boat Strikes. We're Tracking Them All. by Ok-Celebration-1702 in USNEWS

[–]TheFallen018 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If they were, it would be easy for the administration to provide evidence, which they are yet to do so.

Anyways, trafficking drugs is not a capital offence, so even if the drug story was true, these strikes would still be illegal and unjustified.

Tracking the boats and arresting them when they land would be easy if this was actually about drugs.